Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:
ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Back to Paper
cs.CRcs.CY

Local ID: 2604.10138v2

AI Summary: gemma4:e4b

A Relay a Day Keeps the AirTag Away: Practical Relay Attacks on Apple's AirTags

By Gabriel K. Gegenhuber, Leonid Liadveikin, Florian Holzbauer, Sebastian Strobl

Revision History Timeline

v14/11/2026
4/11/2026

“Presented at ACSAC 2025”

v24/14/2026
4/14/2026

“Poster presented at ACSAC 2025. Relay experiments were originally conducted in 2022 by Sebastian Strobl (bachelor thesis) and subsequently repeated and reproduced in 2025 by Leonid Liadveikin (university project)”

★ Version indexed in Explorer

Comparing v1 vs v2

Green = Added • Red = Removed

Title Comparison

A Relay a Day Keeps the AirTag Away: Practical Relay Attacks on Apple's AirTags

Authors Comparison

No author changes.

v1 Comment

“Presented at ACSAC 2025”

v2 Comment

“Poster presented at ACSAC 2025. Relay experiments were originally conducted in 2022 by Sebastian Strobl (bachelor thesis) and subsequently repeated and reproduced in 2025 by Leonid Liadveikin (university project)”

Abstract Word Diff

Apple AirTags use Apple's Find My network: when nearby iDevices detect a lost tag, they anonymously forward an encrypted location report to Apple, which the tag's owner can then fetch to locate the item. That encryption protects privacy -- neither the finder nor Apple learns the owner's identity -- but it also prevents Apple from validating the correctness of received reports. We show that this design weakness can be exploited: using a relay attack, we can inject manipulated location reports so the Find My service reports a false position for a lost AirTag. The same technique can be used to deny recovery of a targeted tag (a focused DoS), since the owner is misled about its whereabouts.
View Full Version History on arXiv