Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:
ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Back to Paper
cs.CR

Local ID: 2604.21394v3

AI Summary: gemma4:e4b

Provably Secure Steganography Based on List Decoding

By Kaiyi Pang, Minhao Bai

Revision History Timeline

v14/23/2026
4/23/2026

No submitter comment provided.

v24/28/2026
4/28/2026

No submitter comment provided.

v34/29/2026
4/29/2026

No submitter comment provided.

★ Version indexed in Explorer

Comparing v2 vs v3

Green = Added • Red = Removed

Title Comparison

Provably Secure Steganography Based on List Decoding

Authors Comparison

No author changes.

v2 Comment

No comment for this version.

v3 Comment

No comment for this version.

Abstract Word Diff

Steganography embeds secret messages in seemingly innocuous carriers for covert communication under surveillance. Current Provably Secure Steganography (PSS) schemes based on language models can guarantee computational indistinguishability between the covertext and stegotext. However, achieving high embedding capacity remains a challenge for existing PSS. The inefficient entropy utilization renders them not well-suited for Large Language Models (LLMs), whose inherent low-entropy tendencies severely constrain feasible embedding capacity. To address this, we propose a provably secure steganography scheme with a theoretically proved high capacity. Our scheme is based on the concept of list decoding: it maintains a set of candidates that contain the correct secret message, instead of directly finding the correct message with more effort. This strategy fully utilizes the information content of the generated text, yielding higher capacity. To ensure the correctness of our scheme, we further introduce a suffix-matching mechanism to distinguish the correct secret message from the candidates. We provide theoretical proofs for both the security and correctness of our scheme, alongside a derivation of its theoretical capacity lower bound. Our approach is plug-and-play, requiring only a direct replacement of the model's standard random sampling module. Experiments on three LLMs and seven PSS baselines demonstrate that our method achieves computational efficiency comparable to prior PSS schemes while delivering a substantial improvement in embedding capacity.
View Full Version History on arXiv