cs.CRcs.AIcs.CY
Authenticity Debt and the Synthetic Content Threat Landscape: A Layered Framework for Trust, Provenance, and IP Governance in the Generative AI Era
May 30, 2026
The paper introduces the concept of 'authenticity debt'—the institutional liability from deploying unverified AI content—and proposes a layered reference architecture combining cryptographic provenance, human verification, and continuous governance to manage trust in the generative AI era.
Generative artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed how content is now produced. It has enabled how high-fidelity text, images, audio, and videos are created, modified, and redistributed at near-zero marginal cost. This shift exposes enterprises and ecosystems to a number of risks across four reinforcing authenticity layers -- authenticity, provenance, integrity, and accountability -- that traditional controls are inadequate to address in isolation. We introduce the concept of authenticity debt: the cumulative institutional liability that accumulates when organizations deploy AI-generated content without preserving verifiable origin, integrity, and accountability, deferring exposure that surfaces under regulatory, legal, or market scrutiny. This paper presents a comprehensive, multi-dimensional taxonomy of generative AI harms and attack vectors, surveys the capabilities and failure modes of technical controls including digital watermarking, provenance frameworks (C2PA, Adobe CAI), and detection technologies, and argues that no single mechanism is sufficient in open, adversarial, and evolving environments. Drawing on Zero Trust Architecture principles and enterprise governance frameworks, we propose a layered reference architecture that integrates cryptographic provenance, human-in-the-loop verification, and continuous governance to sustain defensible authenticity at scale. We further examine the regulatory landscape (EU AI Act, U.S.\ FTC, NIST AI RMF) and identify practical guiding principles for organizations seeking to build authenticity as institutional infrastructure rather than an afterthought.
Governing Technical Debt in Agentic AI Systems
The paper introduces the concepts of Agentic Technical Debt and Stochastic Tax t…
Extending the UXR Point of View Pyramid: A Generative AI-Augmented Methodology for Human-Centred AI…
The paper extends the User Experience Research (UXR) Points of View (PoV) framew…
ProvMind: Provenance-grounded reasoning for materials synthesis
The paper introduces ProvMind, a provenance-grounded reasoning framework that si…
I Hear, Therefore I Trust: A Socio-Technical Investigation of Humans as Synthetic Speech Detectors
This study investigates how humans detect synthetic speech in real-world context…
Explainable Forensics of Manipulated Segments in Untrimmed Long Videos
This paper addresses the challenge of detecting and explaining AI-manipulated se…
LL-Bench: Rethinking Low-Level Vision Evaluation in the Era of Large-Scale Generative Models
The paper introduces LL-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large-sc…
Towards Multidisciplinary Summarization of Hospital Stays: Efficient Sentence-Level Clinical Provena…
The paper introduces a supervised fine-tuning pipeline using large language mode…
Operational AI Deployment Assurance: Governance-State Orchestration Under Threshold-Sensitive Deploy…
The paper proposes Operational AI Deployment Assurance (OADA), a governance fram…