cs.CRcs.AIcs.CY
Authenticity Debt and the Synthetic Content Threat Landscape: A Layered Framework for Trust, Provenance, and IP Governance in the Generative AI Era
May 30, 2026
The paper introduces the concept of 'authenticity debt'—the institutional liability from deploying unverified AI content—and proposes a layered reference architecture combining cryptographic provenance, human verification, and continuous governance to manage trust in the generative AI era.
Generative artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed how content is now produced. It has enabled how high-fidelity text, images, audio, and videos are created, modified, and redistributed at near-zero marginal cost. This shift exposes enterprises and ecosystems to a number of risks across four reinforcing authenticity layers -- authenticity, provenance, integrity, and accountability -- that traditional controls are inadequate to address in isolation. We introduce the concept of authenticity debt: the cumulative institutional liability that accumulates when organizations deploy AI-generated content without preserving verifiable origin, integrity, and accountability, deferring exposure that surfaces under regulatory, legal, or market scrutiny. This paper presents a comprehensive, multi-dimensional taxonomy of generative AI harms and attack vectors, surveys the capabilities and failure modes of technical controls including digital watermarking, provenance frameworks (C2PA, Adobe CAI), and detection technologies, and argues that no single mechanism is sufficient in open, adversarial, and evolving environments. Drawing on Zero Trust Architecture principles and enterprise governance frameworks, we propose a layered reference architecture that integrates cryptographic provenance, human-in-the-loop verification, and continuous governance to sustain defensible authenticity at scale. We further examine the regulatory landscape (EU AI Act, U.S.\ FTC, NIST AI RMF) and identify practical guiding principles for organizations seeking to build authenticity as institutional infrastructure rather than an afterthought.
Decentralized Proof-of-Location for Content Provenance: Towards Capture-Time Authenticity
The paper proposes a decentralized, witnessing-zone architecture that enhances P…
AI Identification: An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Governance in Digital Enterprises
The paper proposes a comprehensive, dual-layer architectural framework for AI id…
Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Acro…
This paper introduces the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT), a compreh…
Operationalising Artificial Intelligence Bills of Materials (AIBOMs) for Verifiable AI Provenance an…
The paper introduces the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Materials (AIBOM) schem…
Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Regulatory Compliance and Treaty…
The paper proposes a taxonomy of 20 hardware-level governance mechanisms for AI…
Where Trust Fails: Mapping Location-Data Provenance Risks in Europe
This paper analyzes location-data provenance risks across multiple European sect…
Sovereign Context Protocol: An Open Attribution Layer for Human-Generated Content in the Age of Larg…
The paper introduces the Sovereign Context Protocol (SCP), an open-source, attri…
Toward Accountable AI-Generated Content on Social Platforms: Steganographic Attribution and Multimod…
The paper proposes an end-to-end forensic pipeline using steganographic attribut…