Staleness-Learning Rate Scaling Laws for Asynchronous RLHF
This paper analyzes the effect of using stale rollouts in asynchronous GRPO and derives a stability condition.
Provides stability condition for using stale rollouts in asynchronous GRPO
Keywords
Before reading this…
Applications
- →Reinforce learning systems
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
- Understanding of reinforce learningfind papers →
- Familiarity with GRPO algorithmfind papers →
Abstract
More Like ThisHigh-throughput RLHF systems often decouple rollout generation from policy optimization, leading to the use of stale rollouts during learner updates. In this work, we study the effect of such staleness in asynchronous GRPO. We make the behavior policy explicit in the GRPO surrogate objective and distinguish between the surrogate-gradient mapping used by the learner and the true total derivative of a distribution-dependent population objective. Under assumptions of local boundedness, distributional smoothness, and behavior-policy smoothness, we show that stale rollouts introduce a per-step surrogate-gradient bias of order O(S * eta), where S denotes the maximum rollout lag and eta denotes the learning rate. We further derive a conditional collapse-time scaling law: when within-cycle drift remains below a batch-level clipping radius, collapse is governed primarily by cumulative learner drift T * eta; when the stale-rollout constraint is active, stability instead depends explicitly on S * eta. This yields a two-constraint stability condition eta << min{R_batch / (S * G_upd), R_crit / (T * G_upd)}, explaining why the maximum stable learning rate may appear weakly dependent on staleness in the horizon-limited regime.