cs.CVEmpirical
DAPGNet: Dynamic Adaptive Physics-Guided Graph Diffusion Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Jul 16, 2026
This paper proposes DAPGNet, a dynamic adaptive physics-guided graph diffusion network for hyperspectral image classification, which achieves state-of-the-art performance on four datasets.
Introduces a physics-guided graph diffusion network for hyperspectral image classification
Keywords
Before reading this…
Applications
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
Hyperspectral image (HSI) classification requires reliable pixel-relation modeling under spectral variability, mixed pixels, and heterogeneous boundaries. Existing graph-based HSI classifiers usually construct graph topology from spatial proximity, superpixel connectivity, or learned feature affinity. However, the spectral physical prior carried by contiguous bands has limited influence on topology estimation and message propagation. This paper presents DAPGNet, a dynamic adaptive physics-guided graph diffusion network that injects a structure-constrained physical prior into relation-level graph learning. DAPGNet first encodes contiguous spectral responses into node-wise multiscale physical-prior representations. A two-stage graph constructor then combines spectral-spatial affinity, physical-prior consistency, and spatial distance to form a physical-prior-aware sparse topology. During graph diffusion, learned edge weights are transformed into additive attention biases, while a physical gate performs node-wise and feature-wise interpolation between graph-aggregated features and projected physical-prior features. Cross-scale fusion integrates node states from different diffusion depths, and the network is optimized with main classification, auxiliary supervision, and second-order spectral smoothness regularization. Experiments on Indian Pines, WHU-Hi-LongKou, Houston2013, and Houston2018 show that DAPGNet achieves the best OA, AA, and Kappa among representative CNN-, Transformer-, Mamba-, and graph-based baselines. It improves AA over the strongest competing method by 3.64 to 7.31 percentage points across the four datasets. Ablation and sensitivity analyses further support the complementary effects of physical-prior extraction, prior-aware topology construction, physics-gated propagation, and spectral smoothness regularization.