Motivations and Barriers to Communicating Software Engineering Research: Insights from Early Career Researchers
This paper investigates how PhD students in software engineering perceive and navigate science communication, revealing motivations, communication channels, and barriers.
Explores a new area of research in software engineering by investigating PhD students' experiences with science communication.
Keywords
Before reading this…
Applications
- →Informing institutional support systems for software engineering PhD students
- →Guiding future research on science communication in software engineering
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
- Understanding of science communication and software engineering research careersfind papers →
Abstract
More Like ThisScience communication is increasingly becoming a part of modern research careers, involving researchers to disseminate knowledge, engage broader communities, and increase the societal impact of their work. Despite its growing importance, little is known about how early-career software engineering researchers perceive and navigate science communication in practice. In this paper, we investigate how PhD students in software engineering experience science communication. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 doctoral candidates from diverse international backgrounds. Using thematic analysis, we examine three interconnected dimensions: motivations, communication channels, and barriers. Our findings reveal a strong tension between aspiration and practice. Participants were highly motivated to engage in science communication due to opportunities for collaboration, professional recognition, broader impact, and advocacy for themselves and their research. However, translating these motivations into action was frequently constrained by social anxiety, uncertainty regarding appropriate audiences and communication venues, limited feedback mechanisms, insufficient institutional guidance, and challenges associated with navigating an increasingly fragmented communication landscape. Our findings highlight the need for tailored, balanced support systems that empower software engineering PhD students to engage in science communication effectively and confidently across diverse cultural and institutional environments. We outline practical implications that offer initial guidance for addressing these challenges in future work.