Fixed Sets and the Hardness of Computing Correlated Equilibria
Computing an approximate correlated equilibrium of a polytope game is PPAD-complete, similar to finding a Nash equilibrium.
This paper challenges the conventional view in game theory that correlated equilibria are more tractable than Nash equilibria.
Before reading this…
Applications
- →Game theory
- →Computational complexity theory
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
- Game theoryfind papers →
- Computational complexity theoryfind papers →
Abstract
More Like ThisWe show that computing an approximate correlated equilibrium of a polytope game is PPAD-complete, and thus polynomial-time equivalent to finding a Nash equilibrium. This challenges the conventional view in game theory that correlated equilibria are more tractable objects than Nash equilibria. From a conceptual standpoint, we connect correlated equilibria to a natural generalization of fixed points, which we call fixed sets. A fixed set of a continuous function $f$ is a nonempty finite set $S$ such that $S \subseteq \operatorname{conv} f(S)$. Our main technical contribution is to prove that computing a fixed set is PPAD-hard even at inverse polynomial precision.