ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.19138v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentApr 16, 2026

Feedback-Driven Execution for LLM-Based Binary Analysis

XiangRui Zhang, Qiang Li, Haining Wang

The paper introduces FORGE, a feedback-driven execution system that improves LLM-based binary analysis by interleaving reasoning and tool interaction, achieving high-quality vulnerability discovery on…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Guiding Symbolic Execution with Static Analysis and LLMs for Vulnerability Discovery

Md Shafiuzzaman, Achintya Desai, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik Bultan

SAILOR automates the construction of symbolic execution harnesses by combining static analysis and LLM-based synthesis, significantly improving the scalability and effectiveness of vulnerability disco…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Dissecting the Black Box: Circuit-Level Analysis of LLM Vulnerability Detection

Syafiq Al Atiiq, Chun Zhou, Christian Gehrmann

The paper analyzes LLM vulnerability detection using mechanistic interpretability, finding that models primarily rely on safety detectors rather than direct vulnerability signature recognition.

View →
cs.CRcs.PLcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

Symbolic Execution Meets Multi-LLM Orchestration: Detecting Memory Vulnerabilities in Incomplete Rust CVE Snippets

Zeyad Abdelrazek, Young Lee

The paper introduces a novel multi-LLM orchestration system combined with symbolic execution to successfully detect memory vulnerabilities in uncompilable, incomplete Rust CVE code snippets, achieving…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LinTree: Improving LLM Reasoning with Explicitly Structured Search Histories

Liwei Kang, Yee Whye Teh, Wee Sun Lee

The paper introduces LinTree, a method that explicitly structures the search history of LLM reasoning traces using parent pointers, significantly improving task performance and search efficiency compa…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Integrated and Cross-Architecture Interpretation of LLM Reasoning

Leonardo Matthew Yauw, Wei-Bin Kou, Yujiu Yang

The paper introduces an Integrated, cross-Architecture Reasoning (IAR) framework to provide a unified and robust method for interpreting the opaque reasoning processes within Large Language Models.

View →
cs.CRcs.MARecentJun 4, 2026

ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense

Anlan Zheng, Tiantian Zhu

ZERO-APT introduces a novel closed-loop adversarial framework for automated penetration testing that simulates attacks against an intelligent, real-time defending system, achieving a high attack succe…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

The Infinite Mutation Engine? Measuring Polymorphism in LLM-Generated Offensive Code

Gabriel Hortea, Juan Tapiador

This paper quantifies the polymorphic capacity of a commercial LLM, demonstrating that it can cheaply generate large populations of structurally diverse, yet behaviorally equivalent, offensive code pa…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

NeuroLog: Reasoning You Can Audit -- Neuro-Symbolic Vulnerability Discovery via LLM Facts, Datalog, and SMT

Sanjay Rawat

NeuroLog is a novel, build-free neuro-symbolic pipeline that combines LLM-derived dataflow facts, Datalog, and SMT solving to systematically discover and synthesize exploitable memory safety vulnerabi…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 20, 2026

FuzzingBrain V2: A Multi-Agent LLM System for Automated Vulnerability Discovery and Reproduction

Ze Sheng, Zhicheng Chen, Qingxiao Xu, Kewen Zhu +1 more

FuzzingBrain V2 is a multi-agent LLM system that significantly improves automated vulnerability discovery by ensuring all reported bugs are fuzzer-reproducible and handling complex cross-function depe…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentApr 30, 2026

REBENCH: A Procedural, Fair-by-Construction Benchmark for LLMs on Stripped-Binary Types and Names (Extended Version)

Jun Yeon Won, Xin Jin, Shiqing Ma, Zhiqiang Lin

The paper introduces REBench, a comprehensive, standardized benchmark dataset designed to enable fair and rigorous evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex binary reverse engineering task…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 14, 2026

COBALT-TLA: A Neuro-Symbolic Verification Loop for Cross-Chain Bridge Vulnerability Discovery

Dominik Blain

COBALT-TLA introduces a neuro-symbolic verification loop that successfully and autonomously discovers novel cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities by integrating an LLM with the TLA+ model checker.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

Ghost in the Agent: Redefining Information Flow Tracking for LLM Agents

Yuandao Cai, Wensheng Tang, Cheng Wen, Shengchao Qin

The paper introduces NeuroTaint, a novel taint tracking framework that adapts information flow analysis for LLM agents by modeling taint propagation as semantic transformation and causal influence, si…

View →