ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.23935v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentApr 17, 2026

PolicyGapper: Automated Detection of Inconsistencies Between Google Play Data Safety Sections and Privacy Policies Using LLMs

Luca Ferrari, Billel Habbati, Meriem Guerar, Mariano Ceccato +1 more

PolicyGapper is an LLM-based tool that automatically detects inconsistencies and omissions between a mobile app's Google Play Data Safety Section and its official Privacy Policy, identifying thousands…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

Ecosystem-Driven Privacy Exposure in Mobile Gaming Apps: A Configuration-Aware Empirical Analysis

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically demonstrates that privacy exposure in mobile gaming apps is primarily driven by complex, configuration-level SDK ecosystems rather than just the permissions the app explicitly r…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 20, 2026

Do Privacy Policies Match with the Logs? An Empirical Study of Privacy Disclosure in Android Application Logs

Zhiyuan Chen, Love Jayesh Ahir, Ahmad Suleiman, Kundi Yao +3 more

This study empirically analyzed 1,000 Android apps, finding that privacy policies are often vague and frequently fail to align with the actual sensitive data logged by the applications.

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentMar 30, 2026

Uncovering Relationships between Android Developers, User Privacy, and Developer Willingness to Reduce Fingerprinting Risks

Alex Berke, Güliz Seray Tuncay, Michael Specter, Mihai Christodorescu

The study surveyed Android developers to assess their willingness to adopt changes that mitigate device fingerprinting risks, finding that developers overwhelmingly support privacy protections even wi…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 25, 2026

PrivacyAssist: A User-Centric Agent Framework for Detecting Privacy Inconsistencies in Android Apps

Tran Thanh Lam Nguyen, Edoardo Di Tullio, Barbara Carminati, Elena Ferrari

PrivacyAssist is a multi-agent LLM framework that detects inconsistencies between user-granted app permissions and the app's actual data collection practices, finding that most apps are not fully tran…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 3, 2026

What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps

Chloe Georgiou, Hans Lu, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gene Tsudik

The paper analyzed 25 popular mental health apps and found significant privacy gaps, revealing that most apps fail to disclose embedded trackers and dangerous permissions, undermining informed user co…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Don't Trust Us: A privacy-by-design android malware detection pipeline

Emmanuele Massidda, Diego Soi, Giorgio Giacinto

The paper proposes a privacy-by-design pipeline for Android malware detection that achieves strong performance by avoiding the collection of sensitive user data entirely.

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 27, 2026

Listen to the Voices of Everyday Users: Democratizing Privacy Ratings for Sensitive Data Access in Mobile Apps

Liu Wang, Tianshu Zhou, Haoyu Wang, Yi Wang

The paper proposes and evaluates DePRa, a system that democratizes privacy assessment by making everyday users active evaluators of mobile app data access, showing its potential to complement expert a…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 1, 2026

Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?

Zhengyang Tang, Ke Ji, Xidong Wang, Zihan Ye +18 more

The paper introduces MyPhoneBench, a new framework that demonstrates that current phone-use agents often fail to respect user privacy, even when successfully completing simple tasks, primarily due to…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Silent Consent, Persistent Risk: Android Permission Groups and Custom Permissions

Olawale Amos Akanji, Manuel Egele, Gianluca Stringhini

The paper analyzes Android's permission system and finds that two legacy mechanisms—permission groups and normal-level custom permissions—allow apps to silently gain excessive permissions and expose s…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 31, 2026

An Empirical Comparison of Security and Privacy Characteristics of Android Messaging Apps

Ioannis Karyotakis, Foivos Timotheos Proestakis, Evangelos Talos, Diomidis Spinellis +1 more

The paper empirically compares the security and privacy implementation characteristics of major Android messaging apps (Meta Messenger, Signal, and Telegram) using static and dynamic analysis, finding…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 7, 2026

Understanding User Privacy Perceptions of GenAI Smartphones

Ran Jin, Liu Wang, Shidong Pan, Luona Xu +2 more

This study investigates user perceptions of privacy risks associated with GenAI smartphones, finding that users express heightened concerns across the entire data lifecycle and suggest comprehensive,…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

What Security and Privacy Transparency Users Need from Consumer-Facing Generative AI

Jiaxun Cao, Yu Dong, Chunxi Zhan, Rithvik Neti +2 more

The paper investigates how users perceive and utilize security and privacy transparency in consumer-facing generative AI, finding that users rely on proxies like popularity and require actionable, tru…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentMay 14, 2026

Analyzing Codes of Conduct for Online Safety in Video Games at Scale

Jiuming Jiang, Shidong Pan, Daniel W Woods, Jingjie Li

The paper analyzes Codes of Conduct (CoCs) for online video games using a novel pipeline, finding that most multiplayer games lack CoCs despite safety needs, and that CoCs often lack specificity regar…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 23, 2026

Modernizing User Privacy Preference Measurement through GPPI: A GDPR-aligned Privacy Preference Item Bank

Yahya Hmaiti, Mykola Maslych, Amirpouya Ghasemaghaei, Trung Cuong Dang +3 more

The paper develops a comprehensive, GDPR-aligned item bank of 527 statements to accurately measure user preferences regarding specific regulatory protections, addressing a gap left by older privacy me…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentApr 4, 2026

Negotiating Privacy with Smart Voice Assistants: Risk-Benefit and Control-Acceptance Tensions

Molly Campbell, Mohamad Sheikho Al Jasem, Ajay Kumar Shrestha

This study proposes a negotiation framework, using composite indices (RBTI and CATI), to explain how youth navigate competing privacy pressures when using smart voice assistants, finding that high usa…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 24, 2026

PrivSTRUCT: Untangling Data Purpose Compliance of Privacy Policies in Google Play Store

Bhanuka Silva, Anirban Mahanti, Aruna Seneviratne, Suranga Senevirante

The paper introduces PrivSTRUCT, a structural encoder-decoder framework that significantly improves the extraction of data item and purpose pairs from privacy policies, revealing that developers often…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYcs.HCRecentApr 8, 2026

Understanding Data Collection, Brokerage, and Spam in the Lead Marketing Ecosystem

Yash Vekaria, Nurullah Demir, Konrad Kollnig, Zubair Shafiq

The paper empirically investigates the lead marketing ecosystem, revealing a highly non-compliant system that aggressively collects, shares, and monetizes sensitive personal data through deceptive bro…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

"You do understand that people don't trust technology?": Explaining Trusted Execution Environments to Non-Experts

McKenna McCall, Carolina Carreira, Miguel Flores, Lorrie Faith Cranor

The study evaluated text-based explanations of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to non-experts, finding that while non-technical explanations improved understanding, they did not significantly in…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 22, 2026

Unlocking Apple's Private Cloud Compute: An Analysis of Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence

Yannik Dittmar, Marvin Jerome Stephan, Thomas Völkl, Matthias Hollick +1 more

The paper reverse-engineers Apple's Private Cloud Compute (PCC) implementation to independently benchmark its model and evaluate its privacy claims, addressing the lack of transparency in Apple's syst…

View →