ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.03587v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Compile-time Security Analysis and Optimization of Sensitive String Producers

Mike Samuel, Tom Palmer, Shaw Summa, Robert Grayson

The paper proposes a general, compiler-integrated framework for secure content composition that minimizes the syntactic difference between secure and insecure coding practices.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks

Murtuza Shahzad, Joseph Wilson, Ibrahim Al Azher, Hamed Alhoori +1 more

The paper introduces a novel, large-scale dataset of vulnerable code snippets linked to CAPEC and CWE, generated using advanced LLMs, to improve automatic vulnerability detection.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Learn from Your Mistakes: Tree-like Self-Play for Secure Code LLMs

Wenqi Chen, Ziyan Zhang, Bing Wang, Lin Liu +2 more

The paper introduces Tree-like Self-Play (TSP), a novel framework that treats secure code generation as a fine-grained decision process, significantly improving LLM security by forcing the model to se…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.SERecentMay 28, 2026

Minimal Prompt Perturbations Lead to Code Vulnerabilities: Prompt Fragility and Hidden-State Signals in Coding LLMs

Alexander Sternfeld, Andrei Kucharavy, Ljiljana Dolamic

Minor, single-character perturbations to prompts can significantly degrade the security of code generated by LLMs, suggesting that prompt fragility is a major security concern beyond simple prompt inj…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Based Secure Code Generation

Mohammed F. Kharma, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Ahmed Sabbah, David Mohaisen

The paper introduces the Mitigation-Aware Chain-of-Thought (MA-CoT) framework, which significantly enhances the security reliability of code generated by LLMs across multiple languages and models.

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 8, 2026

SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization

Houjun Liu, Lisa Einstein, John Yang, Joachim Baumann +4 more

SecureForge is an automated pipeline that significantly reduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities in LLM-generated code by optimizing system prompts, achieving up to a 48% reduction in output vulnerabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 17, 2026

Surgical Repair of Insecure Code Generation in LLMs

Gustavo Sandoval, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Siddharth Garg

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYcs.SERecentApr 15, 2026

Towards Personalizing Secure Programming Education with LLM-Injected Vulnerabilities

Matthew Frazier, Kostadin Damevski

The paper proposes using LLMs to inject personalized security vulnerabilities (CWEs) into students' own code to improve secure programming education, finding that while students found the method engag…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 26, 2026

SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?

Hwiwon Lee, Jiawei Liu, Dongjun Kim, Ziqi Zhang +2 more

The paper introduces SEC-bench Pro, a rigorous benchmark for evaluating LLM-based bug hunting on complex software, finding that even advanced agents struggle with long-horizon security tasks.

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Guiding Symbolic Execution with Static Analysis and LLMs for Vulnerability Discovery

Md Shafiuzzaman, Achintya Desai, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik Bultan

SAILOR automates the construction of symbolic execution harnesses by combining static analysis and LLM-based synthesis, significantly improving the scalability and effectiveness of vulnerability disco…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 10, 2026

DeepGuard: Secure Code Generation via Multi-Layer Semantic Aggregation

Li Huang, Zhongxin Liu, Yifan Wu, Tao Yin +5 more

DeepGuard introduces a novel multi-layer semantic aggregation framework to enhance secure code generation by collecting vulnerability cues from multiple upper layers of LLMs, significantly improving s…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMar 17, 2026

Detecting Data Poisoning in Code Generation LLMs via Black-Box, Vulnerability-Oriented Scanning

Shenao Yan, Shimaa Ahmed, Shan Jin, Sunpreet S. Arora +3 more

The paper introduces CodeScan, a novel black-box framework that detects data poisoning in code generation LLMs by analyzing structural similarities across multiple generations to identify recurring, v…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

VulnScout-C: A Lightweight Transformer for C Code Vulnerability Detection

Aymen Lassoued, Nacef Mbarek, Bechir Dardouri, Bassem Ouni +2 more

The paper introduces VULNSCOUT-C, a compact, specialized transformer model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in C code vulnerability detection while maintaining low inference cost, making it…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 4, 2026

SecRL-Prune: Structured Reinforcement Learning-Based Pruning of CodeLLMs for Preserving Adversarial Code Mutation

Parsa Memarzadehsaghezi, Pooria Madani, Khalil El-Khatib

The paper introduces SecRL-Prune, a structured reinforcement learning framework that effectively prunes CodeLLMs while preserving their critical ability to generate adversarial, functionality-preservi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Testing LLM Arithmetic Reasoning Generalization with Automatic Numeric-Remapping Attacks

Malia Barker, Bishal Lakha, Edoardo Serra, Francesco Gullo

The paper introduces an automatic numeric-remapping attack to test the robustness of LLMs on arithmetic word problems, finding that LLMs remain sensitive to small numeric changes in datasets like GSM8…

View →