ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.04255v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 13, 2026

Inducing Overthink: Hierarchical Genetic Algorithm-based DoS Attack on Black-Box Large Language Reasoning Models

Shuqiang Wang, Wei Cao, Jiaqi Weng, Jialing Tao +3 more

The paper proposes a black-box attack using a hierarchical genetic algorithm to induce 'overthinking' in Large Reasoning Models, demonstrating that this vulnerability can cause significant resource ex…

View →
cs.MAcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Secure Forgetting: A Framework for Privacy-Driven Unlearning in Large Language Model (LLM)-Based Agents

Dayong Ye, Tainqing Zhu, Congcong Zhu, Feng He +4 more

The paper proposes a comprehensive framework for LLM-based agent unlearning, enabling agents to selectively forget specific knowledge (states, trajectories, or environments) while maintaining performa…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 1, 2026

Revisiting Privacy Leakage in Machine Unlearning: Membership Inference Beyond the Forgotten Set

Jie Fu, Nima Naderloui, Da Zhong, Yuan Hong +1 more

This paper introduces TC-UMIA, a novel tri-class membership inference attack, demonstrating that machine unlearning can leak privacy risks to the retained data set, and evaluates defense mechanisms to…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

Label Leakage Attacks in Machine Unlearning: A Parameter and Inversion-Based Approach

Weidong Zheng, Kongyang Chen, Yao Huang, Yuanwei Guo +1 more

This paper analyzes and proposes four novel attack methods—based on model parameters and model inversion—to demonstrate that existing machine unlearning techniques can inadvertently leak the categorie…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 10, 2026

Conflicts Make Large Reasoning Models Vulnerable to Attacks

Honghao Liu, Chengjin Xu, Xuhui Jiang, Cehao Yang +4 more

The paper demonstrates that confronting Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with conflicting objectives, such as contradictory choices or conflicting alignment values, significantly increases their vulnerab…

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMar 19, 2026

Attack by Unlearning: Unlearning-Induced Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networks

Jiahao Zhang, Yilong Wang, Suhang Wang

This paper introduces 'unlearning corruption attacks,' demonstrating that the performance degradation inherent in approximate graph unlearning can be exploited by an adversary to significantly reduce…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 5, 2026

Exposing LLM Safety Gaps Through Mathematical Encoding:New Attacks and Systematic Analysis

Haoyu Zhang, Mohammad Zandsalimy, Shanu Sushmita

The paper demonstrates that encoding harmful prompts as genuine mathematical problems, rather than just using mathematical formatting, effectively bypasses the safety filters of large language models.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models

Xunguang Wang, Yuguang Zhou, Qingyue Wang, Zongjie Li +4 more

This paper introduces a novel framework, the Reasoning Safety Monitor, to detect and prevent logical inconsistencies and adversarial manipulations within the internal reasoning steps of large language…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Divergence Decoding: Inference-Time Unlearning via Auxiliary Models

Humzah Merchant, Bradford Levy

Divergence Decoding (DD) is a novel, effective, and inexpensive method that uses auxiliary models to steer LLM logits during inference, enabling the removal of memorized sensitive data without signifi…

View →
cs.CVcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 30, 2026

Machine Unlearning for Class Removal through SISA-based Deep Neural Network Architectures

Ishrak Hamim Mahi, Siam Ferdous, Md Sakib Sadman Badhon, Nabid Hasan Omi +3 more

This paper proposes a modified SISA framework to achieve efficient class-level unlearning in CNNs, allowing the removal of specific data influence without full model retraining.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 10, 2026

Unreal Thinking: Chain-of-Thought Hijacking via Two-stage Backdoor

Wenhan Chang, Tianqing Zhu, Ping Xiong, Faqian Guan +1 more

The paper proposes Two-stage Backdoor Hijacking (TSBH) to create persistent, trigger-activated malicious behaviors by manipulating the observable Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process in Large Language Model…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 25, 2026

AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective

Zhenyi Wang, Siyu Luan

The paper proposes a unified closed-loop threat taxonomy to systematically analyze and defend foundation models by explicitly framing the bidirectional security interactions between data and models.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

Hidden Thoughts Are Not Secret: Reasoning Trace Exposure in LLMs

Yu-An Lu, Ci-Yang Tsai, Yu-Lin Tsai, Raluca Ada Popa +1 more

The paper introduces Reasoning Exposure Prompting (REP), a method that demonstrates that even when LLMs hide their internal reasoning steps from users, useful reasoning supervision can still be elicit…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

Hidden Thoughts Are Not Secret: Reasoning Trace Exposure in LLMs

Yu-An Lu, Ci-Yang Tsai, Yu-Lin Tsai, Raluca Ada Popa +1 more

The paper introduces Reasoning Exposure Prompting (REP), a method that demonstrates that even when LLMs hide internal reasoning traces from users, useful reasoning supervision can still be elicited th…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 12, 2026

Critical-CoT: A Robust Defense Framework against Reasoning-Level Backdoor Attacks in Large Language Models

Vu Tuan Truong, Long Bao Le

The paper introduces Critical-CoT, a novel two-stage fine-tuning defense framework that equips LLMs with critical thinking abilities to detect and reject malicious reasoning steps introduced by advanc…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 2, 2026

Understanding the Effects of Safety Unalignment on Large Language Models

John T. Halloran

This study compares two methods of safety unalignment (Jailbreak-Tuning and Weight Orthogonalization) across six LLMs and finds that Weight Orthogonalization (WO) significantly enhances malicious capa…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

PURGE: Projected Unlearning via Retain-Guided Erasure

Vedant Jawandhia, Daksh Ahuja, Ghufran Alam Siddiqui, Prashant Trivedi +2 more

PURGE is a novel machine unlearning algorithm that leverages the duality between continual learning and unlearning to achieve high data retention while making the unlearned model indistinguishable fro…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

Channel-Level Semantic Perturbations: Unlearnable Examples for Diverse Training Paradigms

Bo Wang, Jia Ni, Mengnan Zhao, Zhan Qin +1 more

This paper systematically investigates unlearnable examples (UEs) across diverse training paradigms, finding that existing UEs fail under pretraining-finetuning (PF) settings, and proposes Shallow Sem…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

An Enigma of Artificial Reason: Investigating the Production-Evaluation Gap in Large Reasoning Models

Mingzhong Sun, Teresa Yeo, Armando Solar-Lezama, Tan Zhi-Xuan

This paper investigates the production-evaluation gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that while LRMs excel at generating solutions, they struggle significantly to evaluate flawed reasoning,…

View →