ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.04283v1· 19 results

cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Intent-based Security Management Using the TM Forum TR292I Security Ontology

Loay Abdelrazek

The paper proposes a declarative, autonomous, self-protecting framework for securing complex 5G/6G networks by leveraging a standardized security ontology and automated graph reasoning to neutralize l…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

The Fault in Our Drafts: Vulnerabilities in RPKI Specification and Software

Oliver Jacobsen, Tobias Kirsch, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel +1 more

This paper analyzes RPKI specifications, demonstrating that vague or conflicting requirements in dozens of RFCs cause systemic vulnerabilities in real-world implementations, leading to 61 undocumented…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

ExAI5G: A Logic-Based Explainable AI Framework for Intrusion Detection in 5G Networks

Saeid Sheikhi, Panos Kostakos, Lauri Loven

The paper proposes ExAI5G, a logic-based explainable AI framework that integrates a Transformer-based IDS with XAI techniques to provide highly accurate and transparent intrusion detection for 5G netw…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 22, 2026

Breaking Bad: Interpretability-Based Safety Audits of State-of-the-Art LLMs

Krishiv Agarwal, Ramneet Kaur, Colin Samplawski, Manoj Acharya +5 more

The paper conducts an interpretability-driven safety audit of eight state-of-the-art LLMs, demonstrating that while interpretability-based steering is a powerful auditing tool, model robustness varies…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

PINSIGHT: A Comprehensive Threat Exploration of Domain-Adaptive Wi-Fi based PIN Code Inference

Johannes Kortz, Paul Staat, Christof Paar, Christian Zenger

The paper introduces PINSIGHT, a novel methodology that rigorously assesses Wi-Fi PIN code inference attacks by separating environmental effects from typing effects, concluding that current state-of-t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 5, 2026

Exposing LLM Safety Gaps Through Mathematical Encoding:New Attacks and Systematic Analysis

Haoyu Zhang, Mohammad Zandsalimy, Shanu Sushmita

The paper demonstrates that encoding harmful prompts as genuine mathematical problems, rather than just using mathematical formatting, effectively bypasses the safety filters of large language models.

View →
cs.CReess.SPRecentMay 14, 2026

Model Forensics in AI-Native Wireless Networks: Taxonomy, Applications, and Case Study

Pengyu Chen, Weiyang Li, Jin Xu, Jiacheng Wang +3 more

This paper surveys model forensics in AI-native wireless networks, detailing key security problems and demonstrating practical workflows for verifying model authenticity and detecting malicious functi…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 19, 2026

Devilray: A Systematic Adversarial Model Revealing Blind Spots in Fake Base Station Detection

Taekkyung Oh, Duckwoo Kim, Hansung Bae, Beomseok Oh +7 more

The paper introduces Devilray, a comprehensive adversarial model that systematically tests the realistic operational space of fake base stations, revealing significant blind spots in existing detectio…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

PSR2: A Phase-based Semantic Reasoning Framework for Atomicity Violation Detection via Contract Refinement

Xiaoqi Li, Xin Wang, Wenkai Li, Zongwei Li

The paper introduces PSR extsuperscript{2}, a novel static analysis framework that significantly improves the detection of atomicity violations in smart contracts by combining structural path searchin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 22, 2026

Mythos and the Unverified Cage: Z3-Based Pre-Deployment Verification for Frontier-Model Sandbox Infrastructure

Dominik Blain

The paper introduces COBALT, a Z3 SMT-based formal verification engine, to proactively detect arithmetic vulnerabilities (CWE-190/191/195) in the critical infrastructure surrounding frontier AI models…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.NIcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

StormShield: Fingerprint-Based Detection and Mitigation of RRC Signaling Storms in O-RAN 5G RANs

Noemi Giustini, Andrea Lacava, Leonardo Bonati, Stefano Maxenti +3 more

The paper proposes StormShield, a fingerprint-based detection and mitigation technique implemented as an xApp on an O-RAN RIC, which effectively prevents gNB resource exhaustion caused by RRC signalin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 2, 2026

Decoupled Smart Contract Audits: Lightweight LLM Framework via Distillation and Aggregation

Bagus Rakadyanto Oktavianto Putra, Muhamad Risqi Utama Saputra, Widyawan, Guntur Dharma Putra

The paper introduces an efficient, lightweight LLM framework for smart contract auditing that decouples the audit process into multiple components, achieving high accuracy while significantly reducing…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 23, 2026

SecureBreak -- A dataset towards safe and secure models

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera

The paper introduces SecureBreak, a manually annotated, safety-oriented dataset designed to help detect harmful outputs from large language models (LLMs) that bypass existing security alignments.

View →
cs.CReess.SPRecentApr 27, 2026

From Spoofing to Trust: Emergency Alerts Spoofing Testbed and Cross-Cell Verification

Abdallah Abou Hasna, Nada Chendeb, Ammar El Falou

This paper presents an open-source 5G testbed for simulating emergency alert spoofing attacks and proposes a cross-cell verification mechanism to detect single-source, potentially fake, warnings.

View →
cs.CCcs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

Vulnerability Abundance: A formal proof of infinite vulnerabilities in code

Eireann Leverett, Jeroen van der Ham-de Vos

The paper provides a formal proof that a single C program can contain a countably infinite number of distinct, independently assignable software vulnerabilities, suggesting the set of all software vul…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation

Xiaolei Ren

The paper introduces False Security Confidence (FSC), a new metric to measure the inherent prevalence of security vulnerabilities in code generated by LLMs that are otherwise functionally correct, eve…

View →