ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.04288v2· 20 results

cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 7, 2026

Heimdallr: Characterizing and Detecting LLM-Induced Security Risks in GitHub CI Workflows

Bonan Ruan, Yeqi Fu, Chuqi Zhang, Jiahao Liu +2 more

This paper introduces Heimdallr, a novel framework that characterizes and detects LLM-induced security risks by analyzing the full execution chain of LLM integrations within GitHub CI workflows.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 11, 2026

Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

Souradip Nath, Chih-Yi Huang, Aditi Ganapathi, Kashyap Thimmaraju +2 more

Analyzing Reddit discussions, the paper finds that while security practitioners see LLMs as useful for boosting productivity, their adoption is constrained by concerns over reliability, verification,…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Security of LLM-generated Code: A Comparative Analysis

Srivathsan G Morkonda, Mahmoud Selim, Hala Assal

This paper empirically evaluates the security of code generated by seven popular LLMs and finds that all evaluated models generate code containing critical or high-severity vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRcs.DBRecentApr 8, 2026

VulGD: A LLM-Powered Dynamic Open-Access Vulnerability Graph Database

Luat Do, Jiao Yin, Jinli Cao, Hua Wang

VulGD is a dynamic, open-access graph database that aggregates cybersecurity data from multiple sources and uses LLM embeddings to improve vulnerability representation and risk assessment.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 3, 2026

Credential Leakage in LLM Agent Skills: A Large-Scale Empirical Study

Zhihao Chen, Ying Zhang, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng +6 more

This study conducts a large-scale empirical analysis of third-party LLM agent skills, identifying that credential leakage is a pervasive, cross-modal issue primarily caused by debug logging and result…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Bridging Code Property Graphs and Language Models for Program Analysis

Ahmed Lekssays

The paper introduces codebadger, a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates Joern's Code Property Graph (CPG) with LLMs, enabling large language models to perform large-scale, semantic prog…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 11, 2026

Usability as a Weapon: Attacking the Safety of LLM-Based Code Generation via Usability Requirements

Yue Li, Xiao Li, Hao Wu, Yue Zhang +4 more

This paper introduces UPAttack, a novel threat model demonstrating that focusing on explicit usability requirements can cause LLMs to generate insecure code by neglecting implicit security constraints…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

GuardPhish: Securing Open-Source LLMs from Phishing Abuse

Rina Mishra, Gaurav Varshney, Doddipatla Sesha Sahithi

The paper introduces GuardPhish, a large-scale dataset and evaluation framework, demonstrating that even high-performing open-source LLMs can generate actionable phishing content despite accurate inte…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Attesting LLM Pipelines: Enforcing Verifiable Training and Release Claims

Zhuoran Tan, Jeremy Singer, Christos Anagnostopoulos

The paper proposes an attestation-aware promotion gate to mitigate supply-chain risks in LLM pipelines by cryptographically verifying and enforcing claims about training and release artifacts before d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMar 27, 2026

A Large-scale Empirical Study on the Generalizability of Disclosed Java Library Vulnerability Exploits

Zirui Chen, Qi Zhan, Jiayuan Zhou, Xing Hu +2 more

This paper conducts a large-scale empirical study demonstrating that Java library exploits can accurately identify affected versions, achieving high recall and precision, and proposes strategies for e…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

Longitudinal Analyses of SAST Tools: A CodeQL Case Study

Jean-Charles Noirot Ferrand, Kyle Domico, Yohan Beugin, Patrick McDaniel

This study conducts a large-scale longitudinal analysis of CodeQL, finding that while the tool is effective at detecting vulnerabilities, its detection capabilities are not guaranteed to be stable acr…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 23, 2026

Are AI-assisted Development Tools Immune to Prompt Injection?

Charoes Huang, Xin Huang, Amin Milani Fard

The paper empirically analyzes the susceptibility of seven widely used AI-assisted development tools (MCP clients) to prompt injection via tool-poisoning, revealing significant disparities in their se…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

R+R: Reassessing Java Security API Misuse in Current LLMs: A Replication on JCA and JSSE APIs with External Security Knowledge

Tianhe Lu, Eric Spero, Sakuna Harinda Jayasundara, Robert Biddle +1 more

This paper replicates and extends a study on Java security API misuse in LLMs, finding that while newer models improve performance, the misuse risk persists and is significantly mitigated by external…

View →