ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.05292v2· 20 results

cs.CRcs.CLcs.SERecentMay 28, 2026

Minimal Prompt Perturbations Lead to Code Vulnerabilities: Prompt Fragility and Hidden-State Signals in Coding LLMs

Alexander Sternfeld, Andrei Kucharavy, Ljiljana Dolamic

Minor, single-character perturbations to prompts can significantly degrade the security of code generated by LLMs, suggesting that prompt fragility is a major security concern beyond simple prompt inj…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.SEquant-phRecentApr 8, 2026

Broken Quantum: A Systematic Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities Across the Open-Source Quantum Computing Simulator Ecosystem

Dominik Blain

The paper presents Broken Quantum, a comprehensive formal security audit that identifies 547 security vulnerabilities across 45 open-source quantum computing simulators, revealing critical flaws in me…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation

Xiaolei Ren

The paper introduces False Security Confidence (FSC), a new metric to measure the inherent prevalence of security vulnerabilities in code generated by LLMs that are otherwise functionally correct, eve…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Guiding Symbolic Execution with Static Analysis and LLMs for Vulnerability Discovery

Md Shafiuzzaman, Achintya Desai, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik Bultan

SAILOR automates the construction of symbolic execution harnesses by combining static analysis and LLM-based synthesis, significantly improving the scalability and effectiveness of vulnerability disco…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 22, 2026

Mythos and the Unverified Cage: Z3-Based Pre-Deployment Verification for Frontier-Model Sandbox Infrastructure

Dominik Blain

The paper introduces COBALT, a Z3 SMT-based formal verification engine, to proactively detect arithmetic vulnerabilities (CWE-190/191/195) in the critical infrastructure surrounding frontier AI models…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Compile-time Security Analysis and Optimization of Sensitive String Producers

Mike Samuel, Tom Palmer, Shaw Summa, Robert Grayson

The paper proposes a general, compiler-integrated framework for secure content composition that minimizes the syntactic difference between secure and insecure coding practices.

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 14, 2026

COBALT-TLA: A Neuro-Symbolic Verification Loop for Cross-Chain Bridge Vulnerability Discovery

Dominik Blain

COBALT-TLA introduces a neuro-symbolic verification loop that successfully and autonomously discovers novel cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities by integrating an LLM with the TLA+ model checker.

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 8, 2026

SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization

Houjun Liu, Lisa Einstein, John Yang, Joachim Baumann +4 more

SecureForge is an automated pipeline that significantly reduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities in LLM-generated code by optimizing system prompts, achieving up to a 48% reduction in output vulnerabilit…

View →
cs.CCcs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

Vulnerability Abundance: A formal proof of infinite vulnerabilities in code

Eireann Leverett, Jeroen van der Ham-de Vos

The paper provides a formal proof that a single C program can contain a countably infinite number of distinct, independently assignable software vulnerabilities, suggesting the set of all software vul…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 17, 2026

Surgical Repair of Insecure Code Generation in LLMs

Gustavo Sandoval, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Siddharth Garg

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Finding Missing Input Validation in TEEs via LLM-Assisted Symbolic Execution

Chengyan Ma, Jieke Shi, Ruidong Han, Ye Liu +2 more

The paper introduces SymTEE, an LLM-assisted symbolic execution framework that detects missing input validation vulnerabilities in TEE applications without needing complex, real TEE setups.

View →
cs.CRcs.PLcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

Symbolic Execution Meets Multi-LLM Orchestration: Detecting Memory Vulnerabilities in Incomplete Rust CVE Snippets

Zeyad Abdelrazek, Young Lee

The paper introduces a novel multi-LLM orchestration system combined with symbolic execution to successfully detect memory vulnerabilities in uncompilable, incomplete Rust CVE code snippets, achieving…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 5, 2026

MOSAIC-Bench: Measuring Compositional Vulnerability Induction in Coding Agents

Jonathan Steinberg, Oren Gal

The paper introduces MOSAIC-Bench, a benchmark demonstrating that coding agents can ship exploitable code by complying with seemingly innocuous, staged tasks, a vulnerability that is not easily mitiga…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 29, 2026

An Empirical Security Evaluation of LLM-Generated Cryptographic Rust Code

Mohamed Elsayed, Kenneth Fulton, Jeong Yang

This study empirically evaluates the cryptographic security of LLM-generated Rust code, finding that while general analysis tools are insufficient, a custom crypto-specific analyzer successfully ident…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

KVerus: Scalable and Resilient Formal Verification Proof Generation for Rust Code

Yuwei Liu, Xinyi Wan, Yanhao Wang, Minghua Wang +2 more

KVerus is a retrieval-augmented system that significantly improves the scalability and resilience of formal verification for Rust code by managing complex cross-module dependencies and adapting to cod…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

AutoSOUP: Safety-Oriented Unit Proof Generation for Component-level Memory-Safety Verification

Paschal C. Amusuo, Ricardo Calvo, Dharun Anandayuvaraj, Taylor Le Lievre +4 more

AutoSOUP is a system that automates component-level memory-safety verification by generating Safety-Oriented Unit Proofs, leveraging a hybrid LLM-based architecture to overcome manual workflow limitat…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →