ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.09056v1· 20 results

cs.LOcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Type-Checked Compliance: Deterministic Guardrails for Agentic Financial Systems Using Lean 4 Theorem Proving

Devakh Rashie, Veda Rashi

The paper introduces the Lean-Agent Protocol, a formal verification platform that uses Lean 4 theorem proving to ensure agentic AI actions in finance are mathematically compliant with complex regulati…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

When AI Meets Wall Street: A Survey on Trustworthy AI in Fintech

Qingwen Zeng, Zhenghao Zhao, Yitian Yang, Yiqi Zhu +5 more

This paper proposes a unified, lifecycle-centric framework and a detailed taxonomy to survey and analyze novel, finance-specific attack surfaces and vulnerabilities in AI systems used within the finan…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

Security Barriers to Trustworthy AI-Driven Cyber Threat Intelligence in Finance: Evidence from Practitioners

Emir Karaosman, Advije Rizvani, Irdin Pekaric

This paper investigates the practical barriers preventing the trustworthy deployment of AI-driven Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) in the highly regulated financial sector, identifying four key socio-t…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

Evaluating the Reliability of Multiple Large Language Models in Risk Assessment: A CIS Controls Based Approach

Gustavo Roberto Pinto, Arthur do Prado Labaki, Rodrigo Sanches Miani

The study compared the cybersecurity risk assessment capabilities of five popular large language models (LLMs) against human experts, finding that LLMs consistently underestimated risks and require ma…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CLcs.CERecentMay 27, 2026

FinBoardBench: Benchmarking Dynamic Wealth Management and Strategic Financial Reasoning of LLMs via Board Game Simulations

Xuesi Hu, Peng Wang, Jinpeng Miao, Xilin Tao +6 more

The paper introduces FinBoardBench, a novel evaluation suite using financial board games to demonstrate that current LLMs, despite strong static reasoning, fail at complex, dynamic wealth management a…

View →
cs.DCcs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 6, 2026

Toward a Risk Assessment Framework for Institutional DeFi: A Nine-Dimension Approach

Eva Oberholzer, Valeriy Zamaraiev

The paper proposes a novel nine-dimension risk assessment framework for institutional DeFi adoption, significantly enhancing existing methodologies by incorporating novel dimensions like composability…

View →
q-fin.GNcs.CYcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Auditing Asset-Specific Preferences in Financial Large Language Models: Evidence from Bitcoin Representations and Portfolio Allocation

Wenbin Wu

The paper demonstrates that large language models (LLMs) exhibit measurable, controllable biases toward specific assets like Bitcoin, identifying an internal feature that can causally shift portfolio…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

GuardPhish: Securing Open-Source LLMs from Phishing Abuse

Rina Mishra, Gaurav Varshney, Doddipatla Sesha Sahithi

The paper introduces GuardPhish, a large-scale dataset and evaluation framework, demonstrating that even high-performing open-source LLMs can generate actionable phishing content despite accurate inte…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

BlueFin: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Financial Spreadsheets

Srivatsa Kundurthy, Clara Na, Colton Moraine, Anoushka Mohta +5 more

The paper introduces BlueFin, a challenging benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on complex financial spreadsheet tasks, finding that even frontier models perform poorly, scoring less than 50% on avera…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights

Saba Pourhanifeh, AbdulAziz AbdulGhaffar, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper empirically evaluates domain-adapted and general-purpose LLMs for structured threat modelling (STRIDE on 5G security), finding that domain adaptation and model size do not guarantee reliable…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 7, 2026

Swiss-Bench 003: Evaluating LLM Reliability and Adversarial Security for Swiss Regulatory Contexts

Fatih Uenal

This paper introduces Swiss-Bench 003, an expanded evaluation framework assessing LLM reliability and adversarial security across eight dimensions using 808 Swiss-specific items, revealing that self-g…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.IRRecentMay 3, 2026

CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers

George Fatouros, Georgios Makridis, John Soldatos, Dimosthenis Kyriazis +17 more

The paper proposes CyberAId, a hybrid multi-agent system designed to enhance cybersecurity for financial institutions by integrating specialized LLM subagents with existing SIEM/XDR telemetry, address…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 5, 2026

Tailored Prompts, Targeted Protection: Vulnerability-Specific LLM Analysis for Smart Contracts

Xing Zhang, Keyu Zhang, Taohong Zhu, Anbang Ruan

The paper introduces an LLM-based framework that uses vulnerability-specific prompting and a large-scale dataset to achieve high-precision, scalable detection of multiple smart contract vulnerabilitie…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 20, 2026

Capturing Monetarily Exploitable Vulnerability in Smart Contracts via Auditor Knowledge-Learning Fuzzing

Bowen Cai, Weiheng Bai, Hangyun Tang, Youshui Lu +1 more

The paper introduces FAUDITOR, a specialized, self-learning fuzzer that detects complex Monetarily Exploitable Vulnerabilities (MEVuls) in smart contracts by integrating NLP-processed auditor knowledg…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on CFMME: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Multimodal Evaluation Dataset

Qian Chen, Xianyin Zhang, Yanzhi Liu, Lifan Guo +2 more

This paper introduces CFMME, a comprehensive Chinese financial multimodal benchmark, and evaluates current Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), finding that while state-of-the-art models perform mode…

View →
cs.CRcs.MARecentApr 15, 2026

SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce

Qian'ang Mao, Jiaxin Wang, Ya Liu, Li Zhu +2 more

The paper develops a unified, cross-layer security framework for autonomous LLM agents operating in agentic commerce, identifying key attack vectors and proposing a layered defense architecture.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Seclens: Role-specific Evaluation of LLM's for security vulnerablity detection

Subho Halder, Siddharth Saxena, Kashinath Kadaba Shrish, Thiyagarajan M

The paper introduces SecLens-R, a multi-stakeholder evaluation framework, demonstrating that LLM performance for vulnerability detection varies significantly depending on the specific priorities (e.g.…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 17, 2026

SCAFDS: Edge-Feature Graph Attention for Interbank Fraud Detection with Attribution-Grounded SAR Generation

Mohammad Nasir Uddin

SCAFDS introduces a novel, seven-stage graph attention system that models fraud propagation using co-occurrence edge features and generates forensically traceable SAR narratives, significantly improvi…

View →