ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.09089v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 17, 2026

Surgical Repair of Insecure Code Generation in LLMs

Gustavo Sandoval, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Siddharth Garg

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Dissecting the Black Box: Circuit-Level Analysis of LLM Vulnerability Detection

Syafiq Al Atiiq, Chun Zhou, Christian Gehrmann

The paper analyzes LLM vulnerability detection using mechanistic interpretability, finding that models primarily rely on safety detectors rather than direct vulnerability signature recognition.

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard

Urchade Zaratiana, Mary Newhauser, George Hurn-Maloney, Ash Lewis

GLiGuard introduces a compact, schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder that achieves state-of-the-art performance in LLM content moderation across multiple safety dimensions while drastically reducin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 31, 2026

Software Vulnerability Detection Using a Lightweight Graph Neural Network

Miles Farmer, Ekincan Ufuktepe, Anne Watson, Hialo Muniz Carvalho +3 more

The paper proposes VulGNN, a lightweight Graph Neural Network (GNN) model, which achieves vulnerability detection performance comparable to large language models (LLMs) while being significantly small…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Benchmarking Large Language Models for IoC Recovery under Adversarial Code Obfuscation and Encryption

Jaime Morales, Sergio Pastrana, Juan Tapiador

The paper introduces a systematic benchmark to test LLMs' ability to recover Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) from JavaScript code, finding that while LLMs handle simple obfuscation well, encryption-ba…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks

Murtuza Shahzad, Joseph Wilson, Ibrahim Al Azher, Hamed Alhoori +1 more

The paper introduces a novel, large-scale dataset of vulnerable code snippets linked to CAPEC and CWE, generated using advanced LLMs, to improve automatic vulnerability detection.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 6, 2026

SALLIE: Safeguarding Against Latent Language & Image Exploits

Guy Azov, Ofer Rivlin, Guy Shtar

SALLIE introduces a lightweight, modal-agnostic runtime detection framework that effectively safeguards LLMs and VLMs against both textual and visual jailbreaks and prompt injections without performan…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 20, 2026

Understanding Secret Leakage Risks in Code LLMs: A Tokenization Perspective

Meifang Chen, Zhe Yang, Huang Nianchen, Yizhan Huang +3 more

This paper investigates how Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenization causes Code LLMs to disproportionately memorize certain types of secrets, a phenomenon termed 'gibberish bias'.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentJun 3, 2026

Willing but Unable: Separating Refusal from Capability in Code LLMs via Abliteration

Cristina Carleo, Pietro Liguori, Naghmeh Ivaki, Domenico Cotroneo

The paper introduces 'abliteration,' a weight editing technique that successfully bypasses the refusal mechanism of safety-aligned Code LLMs, enabling scalable synthesis of vulnerable code from safe i…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Security Is Relative: Training-Free Vulnerability Detection via Multi-Agent Behavioral Contract Synthesis

Yongchao Wang, Zhiqiu Huang

The paper introduces Phoenix, a training-free multi-agent framework that detects code vulnerabilities by synthesizing project-specific behavioral contracts, significantly outperforming existing method…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 8, 2026

SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization

Houjun Liu, Lisa Einstein, John Yang, Joachim Baumann +4 more

SecureForge is an automated pipeline that significantly reduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities in LLM-generated code by optimizing system prompts, achieving up to a 48% reduction in output vulnerabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.SERecentMay 28, 2026

Minimal Prompt Perturbations Lead to Code Vulnerabilities: Prompt Fragility and Hidden-State Signals in Coding LLMs

Alexander Sternfeld, Andrei Kucharavy, Ljiljana Dolamic

Minor, single-character perturbations to prompts can significantly degrade the security of code generated by LLMs, suggesting that prompt fragility is a major security concern beyond simple prompt inj…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 3, 2026

ContractShield: Bridging Semantic-Structural Gaps via Hierarchical Cross-Modal Fusion for Multi-Label Vulnerability Detection in Obfuscated Smart Contracts

Minh-Dai Tran-Duong, Nguyen Hai Phong, Nguyen Chi Thanh, Doan Minh Trung +3 more

ContractShield is a robust multimodal framework that uses a novel three-level fusion mechanism to accurately detect multiple types of vulnerabilities in obfuscated smart contracts, significantly outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 31, 2026

When Labels Are Scarce: A Systematic Mapping of Label-Efficient Code Vulnerability Detection

Noor Khalal, Chakib Fettal, Lazhar Labiod, Mohamed Nadif

This systematic mapping survey reviews label-efficient approaches for code vulnerability detection, synthesizing five paradigm families and providing a decision guide to navigate trade-offs.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

GuardPhish: Securing Open-Source LLMs from Phishing Abuse

Rina Mishra, Gaurav Varshney, Doddipatla Sesha Sahithi

The paper introduces GuardPhish, a large-scale dataset and evaluation framework, demonstrating that even high-performing open-source LLMs can generate actionable phishing content despite accurate inte…

View →