ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.09165v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 15, 2026

KindHML: formal verification of smart contracts based on Hennessy-Milner logic

Massimo Bartoletti, Angelo Ferrando, Enrico Lipparini, Vadim Malvone

The paper introduces KindHML, an automated formal verification approach that uses Hennessy-Milner Logic and the Kind 2 model checker to verify complex temporal properties of smart contracts, detecting…

View →
quant-phcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

QCIVET: A Quantum--Classical Pipeline Integrity Framework with Contract-Based Subtype Verification and Hash-Chained Audit Traces

Esra Yeniaras, Muhammad Amin Karimov

QCIVET introduces a novel contract-based framework to ensure the integrity of hybrid quantum-classical pipelines by verifying both the structure (syntactic) and the behavior (semantic) of quantum stag…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentMay 1, 2026

Zero-Knowledge Model Checking

Pascal Berrang, Mirco Giacobbe, Jacob Swales, Xiao Yang

The paper presents a novel technology that uses zero-knowledge proofs to formally verify a software system's correctness against a public specification without revealing the system's internal details.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

PSR2: A Phase-based Semantic Reasoning Framework for Atomicity Violation Detection via Contract Refinement

Xiaoqi Li, Xin Wang, Wenkai Li, Zongwei Li

The paper introduces PSR extsuperscript{2}, a novel static analysis framework that significantly improves the detection of atomicity violations in smart contracts by combining structural path searchin…

View →
cs.CRcs.LOcs.PLRecentJun 1, 2026

Tridirectional Discriminating-Power Formal Verification of Smart Contract Reentrancy Defense Against Production-Deployed Solidity Source

Ray Iskander

The paper provides the first machine-checked, tridirectional correctness proof of the OpenZeppelin reentrancy-guard pattern against complex, production-deployed Solidity smart contract source.

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 30, 2026

Alignment Contracts for Agentic Security Systems

Isaac David, Marco Guarnieri, Arthur Gervais

The paper introduces alignment contracts, a formal framework for specifying and enforcing behavioral constraints over observable effect traces, ensuring that powerful agentic security systems operate…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

FVSpec: Real-World Property-Based Tests as Lean Challenges

Quinn Dougherty, Max von Hippel, Hazel Shackleton, Mike Dodds

The paper introduces FVSpec, a large-scale benchmark that translates thousands of real-world Python property-based tests into formal Lean 4 specifications to evaluate AI models for formal software ver…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 1, 2026

Unicity: Predicates and Atomic Swaps

Ahto Buldas, Dirk Draheim, Mike Gault, Risto Laanoja +2 more

The paper generalizes Unicity token ownership using programmable spending conditions called predicates, enabling trustless atomic swaps and smart-contract-like functionality executed off-chain.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Bridging Theory and Practice: An Executable Taxonomy of Security Properties for ProVerif and Tamarin

Leonard Tudorache, Ivan Kurtev, Mark van den Brand

The paper introduces a systematic, executable taxonomy of security properties to bridge the gap between theoretical security definitions and their practical implementation in formal verification tools…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

KVerus: Scalable and Resilient Formal Verification Proof Generation for Rust Code

Yuwei Liu, Xinyi Wan, Yanhao Wang, Minghua Wang +2 more

KVerus is a retrieval-augmented system that significantly improves the scalability and resilience of formal verification for Rust code by managing complex cross-module dependencies and adapting to cod…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

On the Foundations of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

TJ Dunham

The paper proves that platform-deterministic inference is a necessary and sufficient condition for trustworthy AI, establishing that AI trust fundamentally relies on consistent arithmetic.

View →
cs.LOcs.CEcs.ETRecentJun 1, 2026

Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems

Pierre Falda

The paper proposes a federated formal verification architecture that treats verification as a polyglot proof system, successfully validating it on complex production subsystems like a Raft consensus m…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 14, 2026

COBALT-TLA: A Neuro-Symbolic Verification Loop for Cross-Chain Bridge Vulnerability Discovery

Dominik Blain

COBALT-TLA introduces a neuro-symbolic verification loop that successfully and autonomously discovers novel cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities by integrating an LLM with the TLA+ model checker.

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LORecentApr 25, 2026

From Language to Logic: Bridging LLMs & Formal Representations for RTL Assertion Generation

Nowfel Mashnoor, Hadi Kamali, Kimia Azar

The paper introduces ProofLoop, a novel ReAct agent that uses a solver-in-the-loop approach to automatically generate and formally verify SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA) from natural language specifica…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 31, 2026

Detecting speculative leaks with compositional semantics

Xaver Fabian, Marco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, Jose F. Morales +3 more

The paper proposes a novel framework, Speculative Non-Interference (SNI), and a tool, Spectector, to formally detect and verify security vulnerabilities arising from complex interactions of multiple s…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 20, 2026

An Evidence-driven Protocol for Trustworthy CI Pipelines

Fernando Castillo, Eduardo Brito, Pille Pullonen-Raudvere, Sebastian Werner +1 more

The paper proposes an evidence-driven protocol combining Deterministic Build Systems and Trusted Execution Environments to provide cryptographically verifiable guarantees of software artifact integrit…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 27, 2026

Reentrancy Detection in the Age of LLMs

Dalila Ressi, Alvise Spanò, Matteo Rizzo, Lorenzo Benetollo +1 more

This paper evaluates modern reentrancy detection tools, finding that leading LLMs significantly outperform most existing static analyzers and ML models on both real-world and handcrafted benchmarks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.GTRecentApr 24, 2026

Reconstructive Authority Model: Runtime Execution Validity Under Partial Observability

Marcelo Fernandez - TraslaIA

The paper introduces the Reconstructive Authority Model (RAM), a novel framework that proves execution validity by assessing state coverage rather than just state integrity, showing that existing atte…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 29, 2026

Neuroforger: certified violation witnesses for smart contracts verification via LLMs

Massimo Bartoletti, Enrico Lipparini

The paper introduces Neuroforger, a system that combines a new formal specification language with LLMs and type checking to reliably generate and validate concrete violation witnesses (counterexamples…

View →