ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.10800v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

VulnScout-C: A Lightweight Transformer for C Code Vulnerability Detection

Aymen Lassoued, Nacef Mbarek, Bechir Dardouri, Bassem Ouni +2 more

The paper introduces VULNSCOUT-C, a compact, specialized transformer model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in C code vulnerability detection while maintaining low inference cost, making it…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security

Jinhu Qi, Muzhi Li, Jiahong Liu, Yuqin Shu +8 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, practical guide to ensuring the trustworthiness of complex, autonomous agentic AI systems by focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security.

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 3, 2026

QASecClaw: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach for False Positive Reduction in Static Application Security Testing

Mohd Ruhul Ameen, Md Takrim Ul Alam, Akif Islam

QASecClaw, a multi-agent LLM system, significantly improves the accuracy of Static Application Security Testing (SAST) by using specialized LLM agents to filter out false positives, achieving an F1 sc…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 17, 2026

ContraFix: Agentic Vulnerability Repair via Differential Runtime Evidence and Skill Reuse

Simiao Liu, Fang Liu, Li Zhang, Yang Liu +1 more

ContraFix is an agentic framework that improves automated vulnerability repair by using differential runtime evidence to pinpoint the root cause of bugs, achieving state-of-the-art performance on majo…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentMay 1, 2026

Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes

Alfredo Metere

The paper proposes a trust schema and verification framework to ensure that agent skills, which augment LLMs, are rigorously verified before deployment, thereby making human-in-the-loop oversight scal…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Security Is Relative: Training-Free Vulnerability Detection via Multi-Agent Behavioral Contract Synthesis

Yongchao Wang, Zhiqiu Huang

The paper introduces Phoenix, a training-free multi-agent framework that detects code vulnerabilities by synthesizing project-specific behavioral contracts, significantly outperforming existing method…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

AgentTrust is a novel runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates AI agent tool calls before execution, achieving high accuracy in detecting unsafe actions across complex and obfuscated scenari…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.SERecentApr 8, 2026

Argus: Reorchestrating Static Analysis via a Multi-Agent Ensemble for Full-Chain Security Vulnerability Detection

Zi Liang, Qipeng Xie, Jun He, Bohuan Xue +6 more

The paper introduces Argus, a novel multi-agent framework that reorchestrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST) by integrating LLMs with existing tools to achieve superior, reliable, and cost…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Guiding Symbolic Execution with Static Analysis and LLMs for Vulnerability Discovery

Md Shafiuzzaman, Achintya Desai, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik Bultan

SAILOR automates the construction of symbolic execution harnesses by combining static analysis and LLM-based synthesis, significantly improving the scalability and effectiveness of vulnerability disco…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 21, 2026

AEGIS: From Clues to Verdicts -- Graph-Guided Deep Vulnerability Reasoning via Dialectics and Meta-Auditing

Sen Fang, Weiyuan Ding, Zhezhen Cao, Zhou Yang +1 more

AEGIS is a novel multi-agent framework that grounds vulnerability reasoning by reconstructing per-variable dependency chains over a Code Property Graph, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the P…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 27, 2026

GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts

Zijun Feng, Yuming Feng, Yu Wang, Weizhe Zhang +3 more

GoAT-X introduces a novel framework that structures cross-chain smart contract auditing as a Graph of Auditing Thoughts, significantly improving the detection of complex, semantic vulnerabilities in m…

View →
cs.CRcs.PLcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

Symbolic Execution Meets Multi-LLM Orchestration: Detecting Memory Vulnerabilities in Incomplete Rust CVE Snippets

Zeyad Abdelrazek, Young Lee

The paper introduces a novel multi-LLM orchestration system combined with symbolic execution to successfully detect memory vulnerabilities in uncompilable, incomplete Rust CVE code snippets, achieving…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 14, 2026

LogicEval: A Systematic Framework for Evaluating Automated Repair Techniques for Logical Vulnerabilities in Real-World Software

Syed Md Mukit Rashid, Abdullah Al Ishtiaq, Kai Tu, Yilu Dong +6 more

The paper introduces LogicEval, a systematic framework and dataset (LogicDS) to evaluate automated repair techniques for logical software vulnerabilities, finding that prompt sensitivity and context l…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 26, 2026

SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?

Hwiwon Lee, Jiawei Liu, Dongjun Kim, Ziqi Zhang +2 more

The paper introduces SEC-bench Pro, a rigorous benchmark for evaluating LLM-based bug hunting on complex software, finding that even advanced agents struggle with long-horizon security tasks.

View →