ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.14038v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

PSR2: A Phase-based Semantic Reasoning Framework for Atomicity Violation Detection via Contract Refinement

Xiaoqi Li, Xin Wang, Wenkai Li, Zongwei Li

The paper introduces PSR extsuperscript{2}, a novel static analysis framework that significantly improves the detection of atomicity violations in smart contracts by combining structural path searchin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 4, 2026

Safety and Liveness of Cross-Domain State Preservation under Byzantine Faults: A Mechanized Proof in Isabelle/HOL

Jinwook Kim

The paper provides a mechanized proof in Isabelle/HOL guaranteeing both the safety (state preservation) and liveness (progress) of regulatory state transitions across multiple, heterogeneous blockchai…

View →
quant-phcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

QCIVET: A Quantum--Classical Pipeline Integrity Framework with Contract-Based Subtype Verification and Hash-Chained Audit Traces

Esra Yeniaras, Muhammad Amin Karimov

QCIVET introduces a novel contract-based framework to ensure the integrity of hybrid quantum-classical pipelines by verifying both the structure (syntactic) and the behavior (semantic) of quantum stag…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 29, 2026

Neuroforger: certified violation witnesses for smart contracts verification via LLMs

Massimo Bartoletti, Enrico Lipparini

The paper introduces Neuroforger, a system that combines a new formal specification language with LLMs and type checking to reliably generate and validate concrete violation witnesses (counterexamples…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRcs.LORecentApr 10, 2026

A Deductive System for Contract Satisfaction Proofs

Arthur Correnson, Haoyi Zeng, Jana Hofmann

The paper develops a novel, sound, and complete deductive proof system for proving contract satisfaction, which is crucial for verifying CPU security against side-channel attacks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 28, 2026

From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems

Ignacio Peyrano

The paper proposes a Semantic Gateway and a Zero-Trust security model to formally validate and secure autonomous AI agents operating in enterprise systems, achieving a 100% discovery rate of unauthori…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 27, 2026

Reentrancy Detection in the Age of LLMs

Dalila Ressi, Alvise Spanò, Matteo Rizzo, Lorenzo Benetollo +1 more

This paper evaluates modern reentrancy detection tools, finding that leading LLMs significantly outperform most existing static analyzers and ML models on both real-world and handcrafted benchmarks.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Bridging Theory and Practice: An Executable Taxonomy of Security Properties for ProVerif and Tamarin

Leonard Tudorache, Ivan Kurtev, Mark van den Brand

The paper introduces a systematic, executable taxonomy of security properties to bridge the gap between theoretical security definitions and their practical implementation in formal verification tools…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

LibScan: Smart Contract Library Misuse Detection with Iterative Feedback and Static Verification

Yishun Wang, Wenkai Li, Xiaoqi Li, Zongwei Li +2 more

LibScan is an automated framework that detects eight categories of smart contract library misuse by combining LLM-based semantic reasoning with rule-based analysis, achieving 85.15% accuracy on real-w…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 27, 2026

GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts

Zijun Feng, Yuming Feng, Yu Wang, Weizhe Zhang +3 more

GoAT-X introduces a novel framework that structures cross-chain smart contract auditing as a Graph of Auditing Thoughts, significantly improving the detection of complex, semantic vulnerabilities in m…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentMay 1, 2026

Zero-Knowledge Model Checking

Pascal Berrang, Mirco Giacobbe, Jacob Swales, Xiao Yang

The paper presents a novel technology that uses zero-knowledge proofs to formally verify a software system's correctness against a public specification without revealing the system's internal details.

View →
cs.LOcs.CEcs.ETRecentJun 1, 2026

Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems

Pierre Falda

The paper proposes a federated formal verification architecture that treats verification as a polyglot proof system, successfully validating it on complex production subsystems like a Raft consensus m…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 14, 2026

COBALT-TLA: A Neuro-Symbolic Verification Loop for Cross-Chain Bridge Vulnerability Discovery

Dominik Blain

COBALT-TLA introduces a neuro-symbolic verification loop that successfully and autonomously discovers novel cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities by integrating an LLM with the TLA+ model checker.

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 1, 2026

Unicity: Predicates and Atomic Swaps

Ahto Buldas, Dirk Draheim, Mike Gault, Risto Laanoja +2 more

The paper generalizes Unicity token ownership using programmable spending conditions called predicates, enabling trustless atomic swaps and smart-contract-like functionality executed off-chain.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMar 27, 2026

Knowdit: Agentic Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection with Auditing Knowledge Summarization

Ziqiao Kong, Wanxu Xia, Chong Wang, Yi Lu +4 more

Knowdit is a knowledge-driven, agentic framework that significantly improves smart contract vulnerability detection by modeling shared DeFi semantics and leveraging historical audit knowledge.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

On the Foundations of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

TJ Dunham

The paper proves that platform-deterministic inference is a necessary and sufficient condition for trustworthy AI, establishing that AI trust fundamentally relies on consistent arithmetic.

View →
cs.CRcs.LOcs.PLRecentJun 1, 2026

Tridirectional Discriminating-Power Formal Verification of Smart Contract Reentrancy Defense Against Production-Deployed Solidity Source

Ray Iskander

The paper provides the first machine-checked, tridirectional correctness proof of the OpenZeppelin reentrancy-guard pattern against complex, production-deployed Solidity smart contract source.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 2, 2026

Decoupled Smart Contract Audits: Lightweight LLM Framework via Distillation and Aggregation

Bagus Rakadyanto Oktavianto Putra, Muhamad Risqi Utama Saputra, Widyawan, Guntur Dharma Putra

The paper introduces an efficient, lightweight LLM framework for smart contract auditing that decouples the audit process into multiple components, achieving high accuracy while significantly reducing…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 20, 2026

Capturing Monetarily Exploitable Vulnerability in Smart Contracts via Auditor Knowledge-Learning Fuzzing

Bowen Cai, Weiheng Bai, Hangyun Tang, Youshui Lu +1 more

The paper introduces FAUDITOR, a specialized, self-learning fuzzer that detects complex Monetarily Exploitable Vulnerabilities (MEVuls) in smart contracts by integrating NLP-processed auditor knowledg…

View →