ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.14317v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

Investigating Detection and Obfuscation of Prompt Injection Attacks Against Software Reverse Engineering AI Agents

Brian Crawford, Patrick McClure

This paper investigates prompt injection attacks targeting software reverse engineering AI agents, demonstrating detection and defense strategies against both direct and obfuscated attacks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

Investigating Detection and Obfuscation of Prompt Injection Attacks Against Software Reverse Engineering AI Agents

Brian Crawford, Patrick McClure

This paper investigates prompt injection attacks targeting software reverse engineering AI agents, demonstrating detection and defense strategies against both direct and obfuscated attacks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 4, 2026

CREBench: Evaluating Large Language Models in Cryptographic Binary Reverse Engineering

Baicheng Chen, Yu Wang, Ziheng Zhou, Xiangru Liu +3 more

The paper introduces CREBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on cryptographic binary reverse engineering, finding that while LLMs show promise, human experts st…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Automatically Attacking Software Reverse Engineering AI Agents

Brian Crawford, Justin Phillips, Patrick McClure

The paper introduces an adversarial technique using genetic algorithms to deceive LLM-powered software reverse engineering agents, demonstrating that attackers can corrupt the analytical output of aut…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Automatically Attacking Software Reverse Engineering AI Agents

Brian Crawford, Justin Phillips, Patrick McClure

The paper introduces an adversarial technique using genetic algorithms to deceive LLM-powered software reverse engineering agents, demonstrating that attackers can corrupt the analytical output of the…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store

Roxana Geambasu, Mariana Raykova, Pierre Tholoniat, Trishita Tiwari +2 more

The paper argues that current 'on-the-fly' AI agent design lacks necessary software engineering rigor and proposes an 'AI Workflow Store' to provide hardened, reusable, and reliable agent workflows.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

From AI-Generated Content to Agentic Action: Security and Safety Threats in Generative AI

Zelin Zhang, Qi Li, Jie Cao, Lingshuang Liu +1 more

The paper analyzes the escalating security and safety threats posed by generative AI systems as they transition from merely generating content to executing real-world actions via tools and agents, fin…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 14, 2026

Can Agents Secure Hardware? Evaluating Agentic LLM-Driven Obfuscation for IP Protection

Sujan Ghimire, Parsa Mirfasihi, Muhtasim Alam Chowdhury, Veeramani Pugazhenthi +5 more

This paper introduces an agentic LLM-driven framework that automates the generation of functionally correct and security-relevant hardware netlist obfuscation for protecting intellectual property.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems

Lukas Pirch, Micha Horlboge, Patrick Großmann, Syeda Mahnur Asif +3 more

This paper analyzes the security of LLM-based autonomous agents by drawing parallels to operating system security, finding that while some vulnerabilities are inherent, many can be mitigated using est…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 29, 2026

Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look

Youness Bouchari, Matteo Boffa, Marco Mellia, Idilio Drago +2 more

The paper re-evaluates LLM agents on CTFs, finding that while general-purpose agents like claude-code are strong baselines, specialized, modular architectures significantly improve performance and con…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 7, 2026

Foundations for Agentic AI Investigations from the Forensic Analysis of OpenClaw

Jan Gruber, Jan-Niclas Hilgert

This paper investigates the forensic analysis of agentic AI systems using OpenClaw, proposing an agent artifact taxonomy and highlighting the challenges posed by non-determinism in agent-mediated exec…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

When the Agent Is the Adversary: Architectural Requirements for Agentic AI Containment After the April 2026 Frontier Model Escape

Richard Joseph Mitchell

The paper analyzes the failure modes of current AI containment methods when the agent itself is the adversary, deriving five necessary architectural requirements for durable safety.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 18, 2026

Agent Security is a Systems Problem

Mihai Christodorescu, Earlence Fernandes, Ashish Hooda, Somesh Jha +10 more

The paper argues that agent security must be treated as a systems problem, requiring the enforcement of security invariants at the system level rather than solely relying on improving the underlying A…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 27, 2026

AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents

Yixiang Zhang, Xinhao Deng, Jiaqing Wu, Yue Xiao +2 more

The paper introduces AgentWard, a lifecycle-oriented, defense-in-depth architecture designed to systematically secure autonomous AI agents by protecting them across all stages of their operation.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

SoK: The Attack Surface of Agentic AI -- Tools, and Autonomy

Ali Dehghantanha, Sajad Homayoun

This paper systematically maps the expanded attack surface of agentic AI systems, identifying new threat vectors like RAG poisoning and cross-agent manipulation, and proposes a comprehensive security…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 31, 2026

Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks

Chong Xiang, Drew Zagieboylo, Shaona Ghosh, Sanjay Kariyappa +4 more

The paper proposes a vision for system-level defenses against indirect prompt injection attacks targeting AI agents, emphasizing structured control and human oversight.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Security Attack and Defense Strategies for Autonomous Agent Frameworks: A Layered Review with OpenClaw as a Case Study

Luyao Xu, Xiang Chen

This paper provides a systematic, layered review of security risks and defense strategies for autonomous agent frameworks, using OpenClaw as a case study to address the current lack of integrated rese…

View →