ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.14512v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

AgentRFC: Security Design Principles and Conformance Testing for Agent Protocols

Shenghan Zheng, Qifan Zhang

The paper introduces a comprehensive security framework, AgentRFC, to systematically analyze and test the security conformance of various AI agent protocols, identifying critical design gaps, especial…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security

Jinhu Qi, Muzhi Li, Jiahong Liu, Yuqin Shu +8 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, practical guide to ensuring the trustworthiness of complex, autonomous agentic AI systems by focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security.

View →
cs.LOcs.CRcs.FLRecentMar 20, 2026

Agentproof: Static Verification of Agent Workflow Graphs

Melwin Xavier, Vaisakh M A, Melveena Jolly, Midhun Xavier

Agentproof is a system that provides static, pre-deployment verification of safety properties in agent workflow graphs by automatically extracting a unified graph model and applying structural and tem…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems

Lukas Pirch, Micha Horlboge, Patrick Großmann, Syeda Mahnur Asif +3 more

This paper analyzes the security of LLM-based autonomous agents by drawing parallels to operating system security, finding that while some vulnerabilities are inherent, many can be mitigated using est…

View →
cs.PLcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

Language-Based Agent Control

Timothy Zhou, Loris D'Antoni, Nadia Polikarpova

The paper introduces Language-Based Agent Control (LBAC), a new programming model that extends static typing and runtime enforcement guarantees to agentic applications, ensuring that agent-generated c…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

AgentTrust is a novel runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates AI agent tool calls before execution, achieving high accuracy in detecting unsafe actions across complex and obfuscated scenari…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentMay 9, 2026

Containment Verification: AI Safety Guarantees Independent of Alignment

Royce Moon, Lav R. Varshney

The paper introduces containment verification, a novel method that provides safety guarantees by formally verifying the agentic framework itself, ensuring safety regardless of the underlying AI model'…

View →
cs.AIcs.PLRecentMay 27, 2026

LACUNA: Safe Agents as Recursive Program Holes

Yaoyu Zhao, Yichen Xu, Oliver Bračevac, Cao Nguyen Pham +2 more

The paper introduces LACUNA, a novel programming model that allows LLM agents to write code that shapes the runtime environment while maintaining strong type-checking safety guarantees.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Agora: Toward Autonomous Bug Detection in Production-Level Consensus Protocols with LLM Agents

Xiang Liu, Sa Song, Zhaowei Zhang, Huiying Lan +5 more

The paper introduces Agora, a domain-aware multi-agent framework that successfully detects deep, previously unknown logic bugs in complex consensus protocols, outperforming existing LLM-based analysis…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security

Dongrui Liu, Yu Li, Zhonghao Yang, Peng Wang +46 more

The paper introduces AgentDoG 1.5, a lightweight and scalable alignment framework that significantly improves AI agent safety and security for complex open-world agent deployments.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security

Dongrui Liu, Yu Li, Zhonghao Yang, Peng Wang +46 more

The paper introduces AgentDoG 1.5, a lightweight and scalable alignment framework that significantly improves AI agent safety and security for complex, open-world agentic scenarios.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Proof-Carrying Agent Actions: Model-Agnostic Runtime Governance for Heterogeneous Agent Systems

Zexun Wang

The paper proposes Proof-Carrying Agent Actions (PCAA), a runtime-neutral governance model that uses action certificates to consistently track and authorize high-risk actions across diverse and hetero…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 27, 2026

AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents

Yixiang Zhang, Xinhao Deng, Jiaqing Wu, Yue Xiao +2 more

The paper introduces AgentWard, a lifecycle-oriented, defense-in-depth architecture designed to systematically secure autonomous AI agents by protecting them across all stages of their operation.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 28, 2026

From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems

Ignacio Peyrano

The paper proposes a Semantic Gateway and a Zero-Trust security model to formally validate and secure autonomous AI agents operating in enterprise systems, achieving a 100% discovery rate of unauthori…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

AgentWall: A Runtime Safety Layer for Local AI Agents

Ashwin Aravind

AgentWall is a runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates all proposed actions from local AI agents against a declarative policy, ensuring safety before execution.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 31, 2026

SABER: Benchmarking Operational Safety of LLM Coding Agents in Stateful Project Workspaces

Qi Hu, Yifeng Tang, Qinghua Wang, Lanyang Zhao +6 more

The paper introduces SABER, a new benchmark that evaluates the operational safety of LLM coding agents in complex, stateful project environments, finding that current models have a high rate of harmfu…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

The Verifier Tax: Horizon Dependent Safety Success Tradeoffs in Tool Using LLM Agents

Tanmay Sah, Vishal Srivastava, Dolly Sah, Kayden Jordan

The paper analyzes how runtime safety enforcement impacts the performance of multi-step LLM agents, finding that while safety mechanisms can block unsafe actions, they impose a significant performance…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYRecentJun 1, 2026

SafeMCP: Proactive Power Regulation for LLM Agent Defense via Environment-Grounded Look-Ahead Reasoning

Lichao Wang, Zhaoxing Ren, Tianzhuo Yang, Jiaming Ji +3 more

SafeMCP is a server-side defense plugin that uses look-ahead reasoning to proactively filter and constrain tool acquisition for LLM agents, thereby mitigating catastrophic risks associated with expand…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safety

Xuan Chen, Lu Yan, Ruqi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang

The paper introduces SafeAudit, a meta-audit framework that systematically enumerates test cases and uses a quantitative metric to uncover significant residual unsafe behaviors in LLM agents that exis…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

POIROT: Interrogating Agents for Failure Detection in Multi-Agent Systems

Iñaki Dellibarda Varela, R. Sendra-Arranz, Pablo Romero-Sorozabal, J. M. Valverde-García +4 more

The paper introduces POIROT, a novel protocol that uses the agents within a multi-agent system itself to diagnose and detect failures, demonstrating superior performance over traditional evaluation me…

View →