ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.15851v3· 20 results

cs.LGcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

DP-SelFT: Differentially Private Selective Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models

Haichao Sha, Zihao Wang, Yuncheng Wu, Hong Chen +1 more

The paper proposes DP-SelFT, a novel framework for differentially private selective fine-tuning that significantly improves the privacy-utility trade-off for LLMs by intelligently selecting robust par…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 4, 2026

On the Privacy of LLMs: An Ablation Study

Karima Makhlouf, Lamiaa Basyoni, Syed Khaderi, Gabriel Marquez +3 more

This paper conducts a structured ablation study using a unified threat model to evaluate how various system factors (like model architecture and retrieval configuration) influence different types of p…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 3, 2026

SharedRequest: Privacy-Preserving Model-Agnostic Inference for Large Language Models

Peihua Mai, Xuanrong Gao, Youlong Ding, Xianglong Du +2 more

SharedRequest introduces a model-agnostic framework that enhances LLM privacy and efficiency by batching and mixing prompts with noisy variants, achieving high utility and significant cost reduction.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 8, 2026

Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation

Qian Ma, Sarah Rajtmajer

The paper proposes RPSG, a method that uses private seeds and differential privacy to generate highly realistic and strongly privacy-preserving synthetic data replicas of private text for LLMs.

View →
cs.LGcs.CLcs.CRRecentJun 1, 2026

ContinuousBench: Can Differentially Private Synthetic Text Improve Capabilities?

Peihan Liu, Lucas Rosenblatt, Weiwei Kong, Natalia Ponomareva +6 more

The paper introduces ContinuousBench, a dynamic benchmark designed to rigorously test if differentially private (DP) synthetic text can genuinely transfer new knowledge and capabilities from sensitive…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLcs.CRRecentJun 1, 2026

ContinuousBench: Can Differentially Private Synthetic Text Improve Capabilities?

Peihan Liu, Lucas Rosenblatt, Weiwei Kong, Natalia Ponomareva +6 more

The paper introduces ContinuousBench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously test if differentially private (DP) synthetic text can genuinely transfer new knowledge, finding that state-of-the-art DP…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 28, 2026

The Surprising Universality of LLM Outputs: A Real-Time Verification Primitive

Alex Bogdan, Adrian de Valois-Franklin

The paper identifies a universal, statistically predictable distribution (Mandelbrot) governing LLM outputs, enabling a highly efficient, model-agnostic scoring primitive for provenance and quality as…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMar 19, 2026

Towards Verifiable AI with Lightweight Cryptographic Proofs of Inference

Pranay Anchuri, Matteo Campanelli, Paul Cesaretti, Rosario Gennaro +3 more

The paper introduces a lightweight, sampling-based cryptographic protocol for verifiable AI inference that drastically reduces proving overhead from minutes to milliseconds by leveraging statistical p…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LORecentMay 27, 2026

Satisfiability Solving with LLMs: A Matched-Pair Evaluation of Reasoning Capability

Leizhen Zhang, Shuhan Chen, Sheng Chen

The paper evaluates LLM reasoning on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, concluding that conventional metrics are misleading and proposing a paired-formula protocol with Accurate Differentiation Ra…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Fingerprinting Inference Systems of Large Language Models

Anna Wimbauer, Jonas Möller, Erik Imgrund, Konrad Rieck

This paper introduces a fingerprinting method that exploits subtle numerical deviations in the inference system components (like the engine or hardware) to reliably identify the specific components us…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMar 24, 2026

Beyond Theoretical Bounds: Empirical Privacy Loss Calibration for Text Rewriting Under Local Differential Privacy

Weijun Li, Arnaud Grivet Sébert, Qiongkai Xu, Annabelle McIver +1 more

The paper proposes an empirical calibration method, TeDA, to provide a more comparable and interpretable assessment of privacy loss for text rewriting mechanisms under Local Differential Privacy (LDP)…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Differentially Private Model Merging

Qichuan Yin, Manzil Zaheer, Tian Li

This paper proposes two post-processing techniques, random selection and linear combination, to construct a model that satisfies any desired differential privacy level without retraining, given a set…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents

Faruk Alpay, Taylan Alpay

The paper introduces AgentSecBench, a security evaluation framework that measures prompt injection, privacy leakage, and tool-use integrity in LLM agents by defining formal security games and testing…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

$π$Creds: Privately Inferred Credentials

Samuel Breckenridge, Dani Vilardell, Derek Leung, Andrés Fábrega +3 more

The paper introduces $\pi$Creds, a novel system for generating privacy-preserving, decentralized verifiable credentials by leveraging LLM inference over authenticated data, significantly expanding the…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 30, 2026

Privacy Guard & Token Parsimony by Prompt and Context Handling and LLM Routing

Alessio Langiu

The paper introduces a 'Privacy Guard' framework that simultaneously reduces operational costs and eliminates data leakage risks when using LLMs by optimizing prompts and routing queries to secure mod…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 7, 2026

AttnDiff: Attention-based Differential Fingerprinting for Large Language Models

Haobo Zhang, Zhenhua Xu, Junxian Li, Shangfeng Sheng +2 more

AttnDiff introduces a data-efficient white-box framework that extracts intrinsic attention-based fingerprints to verify the provenance and detect unauthorized derivation of large language models (LLMs…

View →
cs.LOcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture

George Koomullil

The paper proposes a trust-boundary architecture using Lean 4 to verify the deterministic structured computations surrounding LLM pipelines, providing verifiable certificates for high-stakes deploymen…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Testing LLM Arithmetic Reasoning Generalization with Automatic Numeric-Remapping Attacks

Malia Barker, Bishal Lakha, Edoardo Serra, Francesco Gullo

The paper introduces an automatic numeric-remapping attack to test the robustness of LLMs on arithmetic word problems, finding that LLMs remain sensitive to small numeric changes in datasets like GSM8…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

Beyond Indistinguishability: Measuring Extraction Risk in LLM APIs

Ruixuan Liu, David Evans, Li Xiong

The paper introduces $(l, b)$-inextractability, a new formal measure that demonstrates that standard indistinguishability properties are insufficient for guaranteeing protection against data extractio…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

The Cognitive Penalty: Ablating System 1 and System 2 Reasoning in Edge-Native SLMs for Decentralized Consensus

Syed Muhammad Aqdas Rizvi

The paper demonstrates that for edge-native SLMs used in decentralized governance, simpler, intuitive reasoning (System 1) is significantly more robust and efficient than complex, iterative deliberati…

View →