ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.16128v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

An Empirical Analysis of Google Play Data Safety Disclosures: A Consistency Study of Privacy Indicators in Mobile Gaming Apps

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically analyzed 41 mobile gaming apps, finding that while device ID disclosures were relatively consistent, location and personal information disclosures showed significant mismatches…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 20, 2026

Do Privacy Policies Match with the Logs? An Empirical Study of Privacy Disclosure in Android Application Logs

Zhiyuan Chen, Love Jayesh Ahir, Ahmad Suleiman, Kundi Yao +3 more

This study empirically analyzed 1,000 Android apps, finding that privacy policies are often vague and frequently fail to align with the actual sensitive data logged by the applications.

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 25, 2026

PrivacyAssist: A User-Centric Agent Framework for Detecting Privacy Inconsistencies in Android Apps

Tran Thanh Lam Nguyen, Edoardo Di Tullio, Barbara Carminati, Elena Ferrari

PrivacyAssist is a multi-agent LLM framework that detects inconsistencies between user-granted app permissions and the app's actual data collection practices, finding that most apps are not fully tran…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 3, 2026

What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps

Chloe Georgiou, Hans Lu, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gene Tsudik

The paper analyzed 25 popular mental health apps and found significant privacy gaps, revealing that most apps fail to disclose embedded trackers and dangerous permissions, undermining informed user co…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

Ecosystem-Driven Privacy Exposure in Mobile Gaming Apps: A Configuration-Aware Empirical Analysis

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically demonstrates that privacy exposure in mobile gaming apps is primarily driven by complex, configuration-level SDK ecosystems rather than just the permissions the app explicitly r…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 27, 2026

Listen to the Voices of Everyday Users: Democratizing Privacy Ratings for Sensitive Data Access in Mobile Apps

Liu Wang, Tianshu Zhou, Haoyu Wang, Yi Wang

The paper proposes and evaluates DePRa, a system that democratizes privacy assessment by making everyday users active evaluators of mobile app data access, showing its potential to complement expert a…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Silent Consent, Persistent Risk: Android Permission Groups and Custom Permissions

Olawale Amos Akanji, Manuel Egele, Gianluca Stringhini

The paper analyzes Android's permission system and finds that two legacy mechanisms—permission groups and normal-level custom permissions—allow apps to silently gain excessive permissions and expose s…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Don't Trust Us: A privacy-by-design android malware detection pipeline

Emmanuele Massidda, Diego Soi, Giorgio Giacinto

The paper proposes a privacy-by-design pipeline for Android malware detection that achieves strong performance by avoiding the collection of sensitive user data entirely.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 1, 2026

Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?

Zhengyang Tang, Ke Ji, Xidong Wang, Zihan Ye +18 more

The paper introduces MyPhoneBench, a new framework that demonstrates that current phone-use agents often fail to respect user privacy, even when successfully completing simple tasks, primarily due to…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentMar 30, 2026

Uncovering Relationships between Android Developers, User Privacy, and Developer Willingness to Reduce Fingerprinting Risks

Alex Berke, Güliz Seray Tuncay, Michael Specter, Mihai Christodorescu

The study surveyed Android developers to assess their willingness to adopt changes that mitigate device fingerprinting risks, finding that developers overwhelmingly support privacy protections even wi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 24, 2026

PrivSTRUCT: Untangling Data Purpose Compliance of Privacy Policies in Google Play Store

Bhanuka Silva, Anirban Mahanti, Aruna Seneviratne, Suranga Senevirante

The paper introduces PrivSTRUCT, a structural encoder-decoder framework that significantly improves the extraction of data item and purpose pairs from privacy policies, revealing that developers often…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability

Tom Lucas, Alessio Buscemi, Alfredo Capozucca, German Castignani +1 more

LLM-FACETS introduces an open-source, privacy-preserving framework designed to enable non-technical domain experts and compliance officers to audit and evaluate the transparency and accountability of…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 7, 2026

Understanding User Privacy Perceptions of GenAI Smartphones

Ran Jin, Liu Wang, Shidong Pan, Luona Xu +2 more

This study investigates user perceptions of privacy risks associated with GenAI smartphones, finding that users express heightened concerns across the entire data lifecycle and suggest comprehensive,…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 23, 2026

Modernizing User Privacy Preference Measurement through GPPI: A GDPR-aligned Privacy Preference Item Bank

Yahya Hmaiti, Mykola Maslych, Amirpouya Ghasemaghaei, Trung Cuong Dang +3 more

The paper develops a comprehensive, GDPR-aligned item bank of 527 statements to accurately measure user preferences regarding specific regulatory protections, addressing a gap left by older privacy me…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 26, 2026

LLM-CEG: Extending the Classification Error Gauge Framework for Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models

Kato Mivule

The paper introduces LLM-CEG, an extended framework that uses membership inference attack success rates and model perplexity to systematically audit and optimize the privacy-utility trade-off when fin…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

Confused ChatGPT: Cross-App Context Poisoning via First-Party APIs

Chao Wang, Somesh Jha, Zhiqiang Lin

The paper identifies and demonstrates a novel vulnerability, cross-app context poisoning, in the shared context architecture of ChatGPT Apps, allowing malicious apps to manipulate the LLM's behavior a…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 12, 2026

Options, Not Clicks: Lattice Refinement for Consent-Driven MCP Authorization

Ying Li, Yanju Chen, Peiran Wang, Issac Khabra +3 more

The paper introduces Conleash, a client-side middleware that uses a risk lattice to enforce granular, boundary-scoped authorization for tool invocations, significantly improving user consent and secur…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 31, 2026

Privacy-Preserving Smart Surveillance with Cross-Dataset Violence Detection and Decentralized Evidence Governance

Hasan Coşkun, Furkan Çolhak, Andrea Kulakov, Vesna Dimitrova

The paper proposes a privacy-preserving smart surveillance framework that uses a MobileNetV2-based classifier for violence detection and employs decentralized, threshold-based encryption for evidence…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 7, 2026

Swiss-Bench 003: Evaluating LLM Reliability and Adversarial Security for Swiss Regulatory Contexts

Fatih Uenal

This paper introduces Swiss-Bench 003, an expanded evaluation framework assessing LLM reliability and adversarial security across eight dimensions using 808 Swiss-specific items, revealing that self-g…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

DataShield: Safety-degrading Data Filtering for LLM Benign Instruction Fine-Tuning

Junbo Zhang, Qianli Zhou, Xinyang Deng, Wen Jiang +2 more

DataShield proposes an efficient method to identify safety-degrading samples within benign datasets, preventing the degradation of LLM safety capabilities during fine-tuning.

View →