ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.19526v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Benchmarking Large Language Models for IoC Recovery under Adversarial Code Obfuscation and Encryption

Jaime Morales, Sergio Pastrana, Juan Tapiador

The paper introduces a systematic benchmark to test LLMs' ability to recover Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) from JavaScript code, finding that while LLMs handle simple obfuscation well, encryption-ba…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

The Infinite Mutation Engine? Measuring Polymorphism in LLM-Generated Offensive Code

Gabriel Hortea, Juan Tapiador

This paper quantifies the polymorphic capacity of a commercial LLM, demonstrating that it can cheaply generate large populations of structurally diverse, yet behaviorally equivalent, offensive code pa…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Obfuscating Code Vulnerabilities against Static Analysis in JavaScript Code

Francesco Pagano, Lorenzo Pisu, Leonardo Regano, Davide Maiorca +2 more

This paper empirically demonstrates that current Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools are fundamentally unreliable against common JavaScript obfuscation techniques, showing that obfuscatio…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

From Prompt Injection to Persistent Control: Defending Agentic Harness Against Trojan Backdoors

Jiejun Tan, Zhicheng Dou, Xinyu Yang, Yuyang Hu +3 more

This paper introduces ClawTrojan, a benchmark for multi-step trojan attacks against LLM agents, and proposes DASGuard, a dynamic defense mechanism that traces and sanitizes untrusted control content i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

From Prompt Injection to Persistent Control: Defending Agentic Harness Against Trojan Backdoors

Jiejun Tan, Zhicheng Dou, Xinyu Yang, Yuyang Hu +3 more

The paper introduces ClawTrojan, a benchmark for multi-step trojan attacks against LLM agents, and proposes DASGuard, a defense mechanism that detects and sanitizes backdoor content planted across mul…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks

Murtuza Shahzad, Joseph Wilson, Ibrahim Al Azher, Hamed Alhoori +1 more

The paper introduces a novel, large-scale dataset of vulnerable code snippets linked to CAPEC and CWE, generated using advanced LLMs, to improve automatic vulnerability detection.

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 24, 2026

Adversarial Malware Generation in Linux ELF Binaries via Semantic-Preserving Transformations

Lukáš Hrdonka, Martin Jureček

This paper addresses the lack of research on adversarial malware generation for Linux ELF binaries by developing a new semantic-preserving generator that achieves a high evasion rate against modern de…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 20, 2026

FuzzingBrain V2: A Multi-Agent LLM System for Automated Vulnerability Discovery and Reproduction

Ze Sheng, Zhicheng Chen, Qingxiao Xu, Kewen Zhu +1 more

FuzzingBrain V2 is a multi-agent LLM system that significantly improves automated vulnerability discovery by ensuring all reported bugs are fuzzer-reproducible and handling complex cross-function depe…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these honeypots provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these systems provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 30, 2026

Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features

Rebecca Saul, Jingzhi Jiang, Elliott Chia, David Wagner

The paper introduces Trident, a novel malware detection system that combines static features, LLM-derived behavioral rules, and direct LLM analysis to achieve superior robustness against concept drift…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 13, 2026

Towards Automated Pentesting with Large Language Models

Ricardo Bessa, Rui Claro, João Trindade, João Lourenço

The paper introduces RedShell, a hardware-efficient framework that uses fine-tuned LLMs to automate the generation of syntactically and semantically valid offensive PowerShell code for pentesting.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation

Xiaolei Ren

The paper introduces False Security Confidence (FSC), a new metric to measure the inherent prevalence of security vulnerabilities in code generated by LLMs that are otherwise functionally correct, eve…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 21, 2026

Blind Spots in the Guard: How Domain-Camouflaged Injection Attacks Evade Detection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Aaditya Pai

The paper identifies a critical vulnerability, the Camouflage Detection Gap (CDG), where standard LLM injection detectors fail dramatically when malicious payloads mimic the target domain's language a…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 14, 2026

Exploiting LLM Agent Supply Chains via Payload-less Skills

Xinyu Liu, Yukai Zhao, Xing Hu, Xin Xia

The paper introduces Semantic Compliance Hijacking (SCH), a novel payload-less attack that exploits LLM agent supply chains by manipulating compliance rules to force unauthorized code generation, achi…

View →