ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.20389v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 23, 2026

CyberMaskQA: A Privacy-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Cybersecurity Question Answering

Matilda Gaddi, Jin Noh, Onat Gungor, Tajana Rosing

The paper introduces CYBERMASKQA, a novel privacy-aware benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models' ability to perform accurate cybersecurity question answering while simultaneously preservi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 7, 2026

CritBench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities of Large Language Models in IEC 61850 Digital Substation Environments

Gustav Keppler, Moritz Gstür, Veit Hagenmeyer

The paper introduces CritBench, a novel framework to evaluate LLM cybersecurity capabilities specifically within IEC 61850 Digital Substation Operational Technology (OT) environments, finding that whi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 11, 2026

Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

Souradip Nath, Chih-Yi Huang, Aditi Ganapathi, Kashyap Thimmaraju +2 more

Analyzing Reddit discussions, the paper finds that while security practitioners see LLMs as useful for boosting productivity, their adoption is constrained by concerns over reliability, verification,…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights

Saba Pourhanifeh, AbdulAziz AbdulGhaffar, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper empirically evaluates domain-adapted and general-purpose LLMs for structured threat modelling (STRIDE on 5G security), finding that domain adaptation and model size do not guarantee reliable…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Cybersecurity AI (CAI) Dataset

Víctor Mayoral-Vilches

The paper introduces the CAI Dataset, a massive, multi-terabyte corpus of real-world, hands-on cybersecurity LLM trajectories, designed to address the performance bottleneck caused by expert operator…

View →
cs.LOcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture

George Koomullil

The paper proposes a trust-boundary architecture using Lean 4 to verify the deterministic structured computations surrounding LLM pipelines, providing verifiable certificates for high-stakes deploymen…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 23, 2026

CyBOKClaw: Human-in-the-Loop CyBOK Mapping for Cybersecurity Curriculum

Yan Lin Aung, Kevin Togbe

CyBOKClaw is an interpretable human-in-the-loop retrieval framework designed to map broad cybersecurity keywords to the Cyber Security Body of Knowledge (CyBOK), achieving high expert-guided mapping a…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability

Tom Lucas, Alessio Buscemi, Alfredo Capozucca, German Castignani +1 more

LLM-FACETS introduces an open-source, privacy-preserving framework designed to enable non-technical domain experts and compliance officers to audit and evaluate the transparency and accountability of…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing

Jiaren Peng, Zeqin Li, Chang You, Yan Wang +16 more

This paper provides the first comprehensive systematization and large-scale empirical evaluation of existing LLM-based Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT) frameworks, offering a structured taxonomy…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

PetroBench: A Benchmark for Large Language Models in Petroleum Engineering

Xiang Wang, Tingting Zhang, Sen Wang, Ying Wu +3 more

The paper introduces PetroBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models across various domains of petroleum engineering, finding that models perform better on subjective tasks…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

KBF: Knowledge Boundary as Fingerprint for Language Model and Black-Box API Auditing

Yijia Fang, Yiqing Feng, Bingyu Li, Mingxun Zhou

The paper introduces KBF, a low-cost black-box auditing protocol that fingerprints LLM APIs by analyzing stable numerical recall near the knowledge boundary, successfully detecting numerous model subs…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

KBF: Knowledge Boundary as Fingerprint for Language Model and Black-Box API Auditing

Yijia Fang, Yiqing Feng, Bingyu Li, Mingxun Zhou

The paper introduces KBF, a novel black-box auditing protocol that fingerprints LLM APIs by analyzing stable numerical recall near the knowledge boundary, effectively detecting model substitutions and…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 4, 2026

A Validated Prompt Bank for Malicious Code Generation: Separating Executable Weapons from Security Knowledge in 1,554 Consensus-Labeled Prompts

Richard J. Young, Gregory D. Moody

The paper introduces a validated, consensus-labeled prompt bank that separates requests for executable malicious code (weapons) from requests for general harmful security knowledge, providing a more g…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 14, 2026

Talk is (Not) Cheap: A Taxonomy and Benchmark Coverage Audit for LLM Attacks

Karthik Raghu Iyer, Yazdan Jamshidi, Nicholas Bray, Alexey A. Shvets

The paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy and auditing framework to assess the collective coverage of existing LLM attack benchmarks, revealing significant and systematic gaps in current testing m…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

Leveraging Large Language Models for Trustworthiness Assessment of Web Applications

Oleksandr Yarotskyi, José D'Abruzzo Pereira, João R. Campos

This paper proposes an empirical methodology to automate web application trustworthiness assessment by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to verify adherence to secure coding practices, showing t…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

Evaluating the Reliability of Multiple Large Language Models in Risk Assessment: A CIS Controls Based Approach

Gustavo Roberto Pinto, Arthur do Prado Labaki, Rodrigo Sanches Miani

The study compared the cybersecurity risk assessment capabilities of five popular large language models (LLMs) against human experts, finding that LLMs consistently underestimated risks and require ma…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Attesting LLM Pipelines: Enforcing Verifiable Training and Release Claims

Zhuoran Tan, Jeremy Singer, Christos Anagnostopoulos

The paper proposes an attestation-aware promotion gate to mitigate supply-chain risks in LLM pipelines by cryptographically verifying and enforcing claims about training and release artifacts before d…

View →