ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.20867v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 10, 2026

Governing AI-Assisted Security Operations: A Design Science Framework for Operational Decision Support

Elyson A. De La Cruz, Rishikesh Sahay, Md Rasel Al Mamun

The paper proposes a management framework, using a governed AI query-broker artifact, to safely integrate generative AI into high-risk operational decision support, such as Security Operations Centers…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentApr 15, 2026

Sovereign 2.0: Control-Plane Sovereignty for Cloud Systems Under Disruption

Justin Stark, Scott Wilkie

The paper proposes Sovereign 2.0, a control-plane-centric model redefining cloud sovereignty as enforceable governance authority and operational control, rather than mere data location.

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentApr 6, 2026

Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Regulatory Compliance and Treaty Verification

Samar Ansari

The paper proposes a taxonomy of 20 hardware-level governance mechanisms for AI compute, finding that the most critical mechanisms needed for international treaty verification are currently the least…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 26, 2026

Structural Enforcement of Goal Integrity in AI Agents via Separation-of-Powers Architecture

Rong Xiang

The paper proposes the Policy-Execution-Authorization (PEA) architecture, a separation-of-powers system designed to structurally enforce goal integrity in AI agents, moving safety from a probabilistic…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.MARecentApr 6, 2026

Explainable Autonomous Cyber Defense using Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Yiyao Zhang, Diksha Goel, Hussain Ahmad

The paper introduces C-MADF, a causally constrained multi-agent framework that significantly reduces false positives in autonomous cyber defense by restricting response actions to structurally consist…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.ETRecentMar 27, 2026

Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?

Shiping Chen, Qin Wang, Guangsheng Yu, Xu Wang +1 more

This paper systematizes the security challenges of open agentic systems, concluding that while attack characterization is mature, the field lacks robust guidelines for operational governance, memory i…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.CYRecentMar 26, 2026

A Public Theory of Distillation Resistance via Constraint-Coupled Reasoning Architectures

Peng Wei, Wesley Shu

The paper proposes a theoretical framework, called constraint-coupled reasoning, to make AI models less susceptible to knowledge distillation by coupling high-level capabilities to internal stability…

View →
cs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 27, 2026

Operational AI Deployment Assurance: Governance-State Orchestration Under Threshold-Sensitive Deployment Conditions -- A Governance Framework for High-Stakes AI Systems

Khalid Adnan Alsayed

The paper proposes Operational AI Deployment Assurance (OADA), a governance framework that translates complex AI evaluation metrics and operational uncertainties into actionable, deployment-oriented a…

View →
cs.MAcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

From Logic Monopoly to Social Contract: Separation of Power and the Institutional Foundations for Autonomous Agent Economies

Anbang Ruan

The paper proposes replacing individual agent autonomy with a structured 'social contract' and institutional Separation of Power (SoP) to mitigate systemic failures and deceptive behavior in multi-age…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

When the Agent Is the Adversary: Architectural Requirements for Agentic AI Containment After the April 2026 Frontier Model Escape

Richard Joseph Mitchell

The paper analyzes the failure modes of current AI containment methods when the agent itself is the adversary, deriving five necessary architectural requirements for durable safety.

View →
cs.CYcs.CRRecentMay 20, 2026

Backchaining Loss of Control Mitigations from Mission-Specific Benchmarks in National Security

Matteo Pistillo, Samantha Faraone, Joshua Herman

The paper proposes a novel, empirical methodology called 'backchaining' to derive and prioritize Loss of Control (LoC) mitigations by analyzing the errors an AI system makes on mission-specific nation…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 10, 2026

Operationalizing Cybersecurity Governance for Mitigation Planning with Attack-Path Modeling and Reinforcement Learning

Philip Huff, Dakota Dale, Harshith Guduru, Rohan Singh +1 more

The paper proposes a system that operationalizes cybersecurity governance frameworks by integrating them with attack-path modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate practical, resource-const…

View →
cs.AIcs.CReess.SYRecentMay 4, 2026

Stable Agentic Control: Tool-Mediated LLM Architecture for Autonomous Cyber Defense

Kerri Prinos, Lilianne Brush, Cameron Denton, Zhanqi Wang +4 more

The paper proposes a tool-mediated LLM architecture for autonomous cyber defense, formally proving its stability and demonstrating that it significantly reduces an attacker's expected payoff in real-w…

View →
cs.MAcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

Architecture Matters for Multi-Agent Security

Ben Hagag, William L. Anderson, Christian Schroeder de Witt, Sarah Scheffler

This paper empirically demonstrates that the architectural design of multi-agent systems significantly impacts their security, finding that coordination mechanisms can introduce vulnerabilities greate…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 7, 2026

Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries

Andrew Kurtz, Klaudia Krawiecka

This paper introduces the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT), a comprehensive framework designed to govern the rapidly expanding and currently ungoverned machine identities used by AI systems…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 30, 2026

Design Principles for the Construction of a Benchmark Evaluating Security Operation Capabilities of Multi-agent AI Systems

Yicheng Cai, Mitchell John DeStefano, Guodong Dong, Pulkit Handa +4 more

This paper proposes a set of design principles and a conceptual benchmark (SOC-bench) to systematically evaluate the blue team operational capabilities of multi-agent AI systems in autonomous Security…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

From Specification to Deployment: Empirical Evidence from a W3C VC + DID Trust Infrastructure for Autonomous Agents

Lars Kersten Kroehl

The paper introduces MolTrust, a production-deployed trust infrastructure built on W3C standards (VCs and DIDs) that provides a verifiable, multi-layered authorization framework for autonomous AI agen…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

AI Identity: Standards, Gaps, and Research Directions for AI Agents

Takumi Otsuka, Kentaroh Toyoda, Alex Leung

The paper defines AI Identity as the correspondence between an agent's declared state and its observed behavior, concluding that current infrastructure and standards are fundamentally inadequate for g…

View →
econ.GNcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 24, 2026

The Security Cost of Intelligence: AI Capability, Cyber Risk, and Deployment Paradox

Sukwoong Choi

The paper models the trade-off between deploying increasingly capable AI systems and managing associated cyber risks, finding a 'deployment paradox' where high-loss environments with weak governance l…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 28, 2026

From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems

Ignacio Peyrano

The paper proposes a Semantic Gateway and a Zero-Trust security model to formally validate and secure autonomous AI agents operating in enterprise systems, achieving a 100% discovery rate of unauthori…

View →