ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.21051v1· 20 results

cs.SEcs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 13, 2026

Code-Centric Detection of Vulnerability-Fixing Commits: A Unified Benchmark and Empirical Study

Nils Loose, Joseph Bienhüls, Kristoffer Hempel, Felix Mächtle +1 more

The paper evaluates code language model-based detection of vulnerability-fixing commits (VFCs) using a unified benchmark and concludes that code changes alone are insufficient for accurate detection,…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Bridging Code Property Graphs and Language Models for Program Analysis

Ahmed Lekssays

The paper introduces codebadger, a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates Joern's Code Property Graph (CPG) with LLMs, enabling large language models to perform large-scale, semantic prog…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 29, 2026

VulStyle: A Multi-Modal Pre-Training for Code Stylometry-Augmented Vulnerability Detection

Chidera Biringa, Ajmal Abbas, Vishnu Selvaraj, Gokhan Kul

VulStyle introduces a multi-modal model that jointly encodes source code, non-terminal AST structure, and code stylometry features to achieve state-of-the-art performance in software vulnerability det…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 31, 2026

When Labels Are Scarce: A Systematic Mapping of Label-Efficient Code Vulnerability Detection

Noor Khalal, Chakib Fettal, Lazhar Labiod, Mohamed Nadif

This systematic mapping survey reviews label-efficient approaches for code vulnerability detection, synthesizing five paradigm families and providing a decision guide to navigate trade-offs.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 14, 2026

LogicEval: A Systematic Framework for Evaluating Automated Repair Techniques for Logical Vulnerabilities in Real-World Software

Syed Md Mukit Rashid, Abdullah Al Ishtiaq, Kai Tu, Yilu Dong +6 more

The paper introduces LogicEval, a systematic framework and dataset (LogicDS) to evaluate automated repair techniques for logical software vulnerabilities, finding that prompt sensitivity and context l…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentApr 2, 2026

EXHIB: A Benchmark for Realistic and Diverse Evaluation of Function Similarity in the Wild

Yiming Fan, Jun Yeon Won, Ding Zhu, Melih Sirlanci +2 more

The paper introduces EXHIB, a comprehensive benchmark of five real-world datasets, to evaluate Function Similarity Detection, demonstrating that current models fail to generalize across diverse low- a…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

Longitudinal Analyses of SAST Tools: A CodeQL Case Study

Jean-Charles Noirot Ferrand, Kyle Domico, Yohan Beugin, Patrick McDaniel

This study conducts a large-scale longitudinal analysis of CodeQL, finding that while the tool is effective at detecting vulnerabilities, its detection capabilities are not guaranteed to be stable acr…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 5, 2026

Lightweight Vulnerability Detection from Code Metrics and Token Features

Chun Yin Chiu

This paper proposes a lightweight, fast vulnerability detection pipeline for C/C++ code using simple token n-grams and basic code metrics, achieving a PR-AUC of 0.642 on random splits but showing limi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMar 17, 2026

Detecting Data Poisoning in Code Generation LLMs via Black-Box, Vulnerability-Oriented Scanning

Shenao Yan, Shimaa Ahmed, Shan Jin, Sunpreet S. Arora +3 more

The paper introduces CodeScan, a novel black-box framework that detects data poisoning in code generation LLMs by analyzing structural similarities across multiple generations to identify recurring, v…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 5, 2026

MOSAIC-Bench: Measuring Compositional Vulnerability Induction in Coding Agents

Jonathan Steinberg, Oren Gal

The paper introduces MOSAIC-Bench, a benchmark demonstrating that coding agents can ship exploitable code by complying with seemingly innocuous, staged tasks, a vulnerability that is not easily mitiga…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 17, 2026

Surgical Repair of Insecure Code Generation in LLMs

Gustavo Sandoval, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Siddharth Garg

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

View →
cs.CCcs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

Vulnerability Abundance: A formal proof of infinite vulnerabilities in code

Eireann Leverett, Jeroen van der Ham-de Vos

The paper provides a formal proof that a single C program can contain a countably infinite number of distinct, independently assignable software vulnerabilities, suggesting the set of all software vul…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Compile-time Security Analysis and Optimization of Sensitive String Producers

Mike Samuel, Tom Palmer, Shaw Summa, Robert Grayson

The paper proposes a general, compiler-integrated framework for secure content composition that minimizes the syntactic difference between secure and insecure coding practices.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Guiding Symbolic Execution with Static Analysis and LLMs for Vulnerability Discovery

Md Shafiuzzaman, Achintya Desai, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik Bultan

SAILOR automates the construction of symbolic execution harnesses by combining static analysis and LLM-based synthesis, significantly improving the scalability and effectiveness of vulnerability disco…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 30, 2026

How Code Representation Shapes False-Positive Dynamics in Cross-Language LLM Vulnerability Detection

Maofei Chen, Laifu Wang, Yue Qin, Yuan Wang +2 more

The paper demonstrates that using raw source text for fine-tuning LLMs on vulnerability detection causes high false-positive rates by memorizing surface-level syntax, a problem mitigated by using Abst…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentJun 3, 2026

Willing but Unable: Separating Refusal from Capability in Code LLMs via Abliteration

Cristina Carleo, Pietro Liguori, Naghmeh Ivaki, Domenico Cotroneo

The paper introduces 'abliteration,' a weight editing technique that successfully bypasses the refusal mechanism of safety-aligned Code LLMs, enabling scalable synthesis of vulnerable code from safe i…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

Finding Memory Leaks in C/C++ Programs via Neuro-Symbolic Augmented Static Analysis

Huihui Huang, Jieke Shi, Bo Wang, Zhou Yang +1 more

MemHint is a neuro-symbolic static analysis pipeline that significantly improves memory leak detection in C/C++ by combining LLM semantic understanding with Z3 symbolic reasoning, detecting more leaks…

View →