ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.23248v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 1, 2026

Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?

Zhengyang Tang, Ke Ji, Xidong Wang, Zihan Ye +18 more

The paper introduces MyPhoneBench, a new framework that demonstrates that current phone-use agents often fail to respect user privacy, even when successfully completing simple tasks, primarily due to…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 20, 2026

Do Privacy Policies Match with the Logs? An Empirical Study of Privacy Disclosure in Android Application Logs

Zhiyuan Chen, Love Jayesh Ahir, Ahmad Suleiman, Kundi Yao +3 more

This study empirically analyzed 1,000 Android apps, finding that privacy policies are often vague and frequently fail to align with the actual sensitive data logged by the applications.

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentMar 30, 2026

Uncovering Relationships between Android Developers, User Privacy, and Developer Willingness to Reduce Fingerprinting Risks

Alex Berke, Güliz Seray Tuncay, Michael Specter, Mihai Christodorescu

The study surveyed Android developers to assess their willingness to adopt changes that mitigate device fingerprinting risks, finding that developers overwhelmingly support privacy protections even wi…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Don't Trust Us: A privacy-by-design android malware detection pipeline

Emmanuele Massidda, Diego Soi, Giorgio Giacinto

The paper proposes a privacy-by-design pipeline for Android malware detection that achieves strong performance by avoiding the collection of sensitive user data entirely.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

An Empirical Analysis of Google Play Data Safety Disclosures: A Consistency Study of Privacy Indicators in Mobile Gaming Apps

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically analyzed 41 mobile gaming apps, finding that while device ID disclosures were relatively consistent, location and personal information disclosures showed significant mismatches…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Silent Consent, Persistent Risk: Android Permission Groups and Custom Permissions

Olawale Amos Akanji, Manuel Egele, Gianluca Stringhini

The paper analyzes Android's permission system and finds that two legacy mechanisms—permission groups and normal-level custom permissions—allow apps to silently gain excessive permissions and expose s…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 17, 2026

PolicyGapper: Automated Detection of Inconsistencies Between Google Play Data Safety Sections and Privacy Policies Using LLMs

Luca Ferrari, Billel Habbati, Meriem Guerar, Mariano Ceccato +1 more

PolicyGapper is an LLM-based tool that automatically detects inconsistencies and omissions between a mobile app's Google Play Data Safety Section and its official Privacy Policy, identifying thousands…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

Ecosystem-Driven Privacy Exposure in Mobile Gaming Apps: A Configuration-Aware Empirical Analysis

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically demonstrates that privacy exposure in mobile gaming apps is primarily driven by complex, configuration-level SDK ecosystems rather than just the permissions the app explicitly r…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 31, 2026

An Empirical Comparison of Security and Privacy Characteristics of Android Messaging Apps

Ioannis Karyotakis, Foivos Timotheos Proestakis, Evangelos Talos, Diomidis Spinellis +1 more

The paper empirically compares the security and privacy implementation characteristics of major Android messaging apps (Meta Messenger, Signal, and Telegram) using static and dynamic analysis, finding…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 27, 2026

Listen to the Voices of Everyday Users: Democratizing Privacy Ratings for Sensitive Data Access in Mobile Apps

Liu Wang, Tianshu Zhou, Haoyu Wang, Yi Wang

The paper proposes and evaluates DePRa, a system that democratizes privacy assessment by making everyday users active evaluators of mobile app data access, showing its potential to complement expert a…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 3, 2026

What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps

Chloe Georgiou, Hans Lu, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gene Tsudik

The paper analyzed 25 popular mental health apps and found significant privacy gaps, revealing that most apps fail to disclose embedded trackers and dangerous permissions, undermining informed user co…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

MaskClaw: Edge-Side Personalized Privacy Arbitration for GUI Agents with Behavior-Driven Skill Evolution

Yanqiu Zhao, Dongying Zheng, Kaibo Huang, Yukun Wei +2 more

MaskClaw is an edge-side privacy arbitrator that protects sensitive data in GUI agent screenshots by combining local visual evidence, task-specific policies, and a skill-evolution mechanism.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 22, 2026

Unlocking Apple's Private Cloud Compute: An Analysis of Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence

Yannik Dittmar, Marvin Jerome Stephan, Thomas Völkl, Matthias Hollick +1 more

The paper reverse-engineers Apple's Private Cloud Compute (PCC) implementation to independently benchmark its model and evaluate its privacy claims, addressing the lack of transparency in Apple's syst…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Profiling for Pennies: Unveiling the Privacy Iceberg of LLM Agents

Jiahao Chen, Qi Zhang, Ruixiao Lin, Chunyi Zhou +6 more

The paper introduces the PrivacyIceberg framework to systematically categorize and empirically demonstrate the high risk of automated, deep personal profiling using LLM agents, revealing a significant…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

AgentGuard: An Attribute-Based Access Control Framework for Tool-Use LLM-Based Agent

Jiaqi Luo, Songyang Peng, Jiarun Dai, Zhile Chen +5 more

AgentGuard is an attribute-based access control framework designed to mitigate severe security risks, such as privacy leakage and system compromise, in tool-using LLM-based agents.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 23, 2026

Reframing LLM Agent Security as an Agent-Human Interaction Problem

Peiran Wang, Ying Li, Yuan Tian

The paper argues that LLM agent security is fundamentally an agent-human interaction (AHI) problem, demonstrating that industry practices rely on human-centric mechanisms while academic research focus…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information

Kyzyl Monteiro, Minjung Park, Alexander Ioffrida, Angelina Sanna +5 more

This study investigated user reactions to inferred personal information from their own ChatGPT histories, finding that acceptability is governed by context-sensitive norms regarding generation, retent…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.OSRecentApr 21, 2026

An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data

Robert Stanley, Avi Verma, Lillian Tsai, Konstantinos Kallas +1 more

The paper introduces GAAP, an execution environment that deterministically guarantees the confidentiality of private user data by enforcing user-defined permission specifications on AI agents, even ag…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

MARD: A Multi-Agent Framework for Robust Android Malware Detection

Xueying Zeng, Youquan Xian, Sihao Liu, Xudong Mou +3 more

MARD introduces a multi-agent framework that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with traditional static analysis engines to achieve robust and highly interpretable Android malware detection with lo…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say

Mingxuan Zhang, Jiahui Han, Dadi Guo, Songze Li +4 more

The paper introduces PrivacyPeek, a new benchmark that audits the acquisition stage of LLM-based agents to demonstrate that unnecessary acquisition of sensitive data is a widespread and critical priva…

View →