ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.23887v2· 20 results

cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 5, 2026

ARGUS: Defending LLM Agents Against Context-Aware Prompt Injection

Shihao Weng, Yang Feng, Jinrui Zhang, Xiaofei Xie +2 more

The paper introduces ARGUS, a defense mechanism that uses provenance-aware decision auditing to protect LLM agents from sophisticated, context-aware prompt injection attacks, significantly reducing th…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 4, 2026

AttackEval: A Systematic Empirical Study of Prompt Injection Attack Effectiveness Against Large Language Models

Jackson Wang

AttackEval systematically evaluates the effectiveness of 250 prompt injection prompts across ten attack categories, finding that composite and obfuscation attacks are highly effective against current…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 31, 2026

Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks

Chong Xiang, Drew Zagieboylo, Shaona Ghosh, Sanjay Kariyappa +4 more

The paper proposes a vision for system-level defenses against indirect prompt injection attacks targeting AI agents, emphasizing structured control and human oversight.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 23, 2026

Poisoning the Watchtower: Prompt Injection Attacks Against LLM-Augmented Security Operations Through Adversarial Log Content

Rohan Pandey, Archit Bhujang

The paper introduces 'log-substrate prompt injection,' demonstrating that attacker-controlled log fields can be used to manipulate LLM-powered security analysis, with persona hijacking and context man…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 11, 2026

PlanGuard: Defending Agents against Indirect Prompt Injection via Planning-based Consistency Verification

Guangyu Gong, Zizhuang Deng

PlanGuard is a training-free defense framework that uses an isolated Planner and hierarchical verification to defend LLM agents against Indirect Prompt Injection by verifying the consistency of planne…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Evaluating using Mock Tool Calls to Quarantine Untrusted Prompt Inputs

David Gros, Adam Gleave

The paper tested the hypothesis that wrapping untrusted prompt inputs in mock tool calls would improve LLM robustness, but found that this technique generally fails and can even increase vulnerability…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents

Faruk Alpay, Taylan Alpay

The paper introduces AgentSecBench, a security evaluation framework that measures prompt injection, privacy leakage, and tool-use integrity in LLM agents by defining formal security games and testing…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 29, 2026

Indirect Prompt Injection in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Prevalence, Techniques, and Objectives

Soheil Khodayari, Xuenan Zhang, Bhupendra Acharya, Giancarlo Pellegrino

This paper provides a large-scale empirical analysis of indirect prompt injections found in webpages, revealing that prompt-based interference is a widespread, persistent, and growing threat targeting…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 23, 2026

Are AI-assisted Development Tools Immune to Prompt Injection?

Charoes Huang, Xin Huang, Amin Milani Fard

The paper empirically analyzes the susceptibility of seven widely used AI-assisted development tools (MCP clients) to prompt injection via tool-poisoning, revealing significant disparities in their se…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

From Prompt Injection to Persistent Control: Defending Agentic Harness Against Trojan Backdoors

Jiejun Tan, Zhicheng Dou, Xinyu Yang, Yuyang Hu +3 more

This paper introduces ClawTrojan, a benchmark for multi-step trojan attacks against LLM agents, and proposes DASGuard, a dynamic defense mechanism that traces and sanitizes untrusted control content i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

From Prompt Injection to Persistent Control: Defending Agentic Harness Against Trojan Backdoors

Jiejun Tan, Zhicheng Dou, Xinyu Yang, Yuyang Hu +3 more

The paper introduces ClawTrojan, a benchmark for multi-step trojan attacks against LLM agents, and proposes DASGuard, a defense mechanism that detects and sanitizes backdoor content planted across mul…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 9, 2026

PIArena: A Platform for Prompt Injection Evaluation

Runpeng Geng, Chenlong Yin, Yanting Wang, Ying Chen +1 more

The paper introduces PIArena, a unified and extensible platform designed to address the lack of standardized evaluation for prompt injection, revealing critical limitations in current state-of-the-art…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 3, 2026

Domain-Conditioned Safety in Frontier Computer-Using Agents: A 793-Episode Browser Benchmark, a Coding-Domain Cross-Reference, and a Reproducibility Audit of Recent Red-Teaming

Nicholas Saban

The paper benchmarks current frontier computer-using agents against hand-crafted attacks, finding that while they are highly safe in browser tasks, this safety does not generalize to other domains lik…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 8, 2026

SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization

Houjun Liu, Lisa Einstein, John Yang, Joachim Baumann +4 more

SecureForge is an automated pipeline that significantly reduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities in LLM-generated code by optimizing system prompts, achieving up to a 48% reduction in output vulnerabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 25, 2026

Invisible Threats from Model Context Protocol: Generating Stealthy Injection Payload via Tree-based Adaptive Search

Yulin Shen, Xudong Pan, Geng Hong, Min Yang

The paper introduces Tree structured Injection for Payloads (TIP), a novel black-box attack framework that reliably generates stealthy injection payloads to seize control of LLM agents utilizing the M…

View →