ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.02016v3· 20 results

cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 20, 2026

Do Privacy Policies Match with the Logs? An Empirical Study of Privacy Disclosure in Android Application Logs

Zhiyuan Chen, Love Jayesh Ahir, Ahmad Suleiman, Kundi Yao +3 more

This study empirically analyzed 1,000 Android apps, finding that privacy policies are often vague and frequently fail to align with the actual sensitive data logged by the applications.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

An Empirical Analysis of Google Play Data Safety Disclosures: A Consistency Study of Privacy Indicators in Mobile Gaming Apps

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically analyzed 41 mobile gaming apps, finding that while device ID disclosures were relatively consistent, location and personal information disclosures showed significant mismatches…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 17, 2026

PolicyGapper: Automated Detection of Inconsistencies Between Google Play Data Safety Sections and Privacy Policies Using LLMs

Luca Ferrari, Billel Habbati, Meriem Guerar, Mariano Ceccato +1 more

PolicyGapper is an LLM-based tool that automatically detects inconsistencies and omissions between a mobile app's Google Play Data Safety Section and its official Privacy Policy, identifying thousands…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentApr 4, 2026

Negotiating Privacy with Smart Voice Assistants: Risk-Benefit and Control-Acceptance Tensions

Molly Campbell, Mohamad Sheikho Al Jasem, Ajay Kumar Shrestha

This study proposes a negotiation framework, using composite indices (RBTI and CATI), to explain how youth navigate competing privacy pressures when using smart voice assistants, finding that high usa…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 27, 2026

Listen to the Voices of Everyday Users: Democratizing Privacy Ratings for Sensitive Data Access in Mobile Apps

Liu Wang, Tianshu Zhou, Haoyu Wang, Yi Wang

The paper proposes and evaluates DePRa, a system that democratizes privacy assessment by making everyday users active evaluators of mobile app data access, showing its potential to complement expert a…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information

Kyzyl Monteiro, Minjung Park, Alexander Ioffrida, Angelina Sanna +5 more

This study investigated user reactions to inferred personal information from their own ChatGPT histories, finding that acceptability is governed by context-sensitive norms regarding generation, retent…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 1, 2026

Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?

Zhengyang Tang, Ke Ji, Xidong Wang, Zihan Ye +18 more

The paper introduces MyPhoneBench, a new framework that demonstrates that current phone-use agents often fail to respect user privacy, even when successfully completing simple tasks, primarily due to…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback

Jiwon Kim, Maya Ajit, Sherry Gong, Soorya Ram Shimgekar +3 more

The paper introduces LLUMI, an open-source framework that improves LLM writing assistance for mental health support using community feedback, demonstrating comparable performance to proprietary models…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 7, 2026

Understanding User Privacy Perceptions of GenAI Smartphones

Ran Jin, Liu Wang, Shidong Pan, Luona Xu +2 more

This study investigates user perceptions of privacy risks associated with GenAI smartphones, finding that users express heightened concerns across the entire data lifecycle and suggest comprehensive,…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentMar 30, 2026

Uncovering Relationships between Android Developers, User Privacy, and Developer Willingness to Reduce Fingerprinting Risks

Alex Berke, Güliz Seray Tuncay, Michael Specter, Mihai Christodorescu

The study surveyed Android developers to assess their willingness to adopt changes that mitigate device fingerprinting risks, finding that developers overwhelmingly support privacy protections even wi…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 12, 2026

PrivacySIM: Evaluating LLM Simulation of User Privacy Behavior

James Flemings, Murali Annavaram

The paper introduces PrivacySIM, an evaluation suite that benchmarks how well LLMs can simulate individual user privacy decisions based on persona attributes, finding that while conditioning improves…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Profiling for Pennies: Unveiling the Privacy Iceberg of LLM Agents

Jiahao Chen, Qi Zhang, Ruixiao Lin, Chunyi Zhou +6 more

The paper introduces the PrivacyIceberg framework to systematically categorize and empirically demonstrate the high risk of automated, deep personal profiling using LLM agents, revealing a significant…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

Ecosystem-Driven Privacy Exposure in Mobile Gaming Apps: A Configuration-Aware Empirical Analysis

Bakheet Aljedaani

This study empirically demonstrates that privacy exposure in mobile gaming apps is primarily driven by complex, configuration-level SDK ecosystems rather than just the permissions the app explicitly r…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Silent Consent, Persistent Risk: Android Permission Groups and Custom Permissions

Olawale Amos Akanji, Manuel Egele, Gianluca Stringhini

The paper analyzes Android's permission system and finds that two legacy mechanisms—permission groups and normal-level custom permissions—allow apps to silently gain excessive permissions and expose s…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 25, 2026

PrivacyAssist: A User-Centric Agent Framework for Detecting Privacy Inconsistencies in Android Apps

Tran Thanh Lam Nguyen, Edoardo Di Tullio, Barbara Carminati, Elena Ferrari

PrivacyAssist is a multi-agent LLM framework that detects inconsistencies between user-granted app permissions and the app's actual data collection practices, finding that most apps are not fully tran…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMar 28, 2026

Gender-Based Heterogeneity in Youth Privacy-Protective Behavior for Smart Voice Assistants: Evidence from Multigroup PLS-SEM

Molly Campbell, Yulia Bobkova, Ajay Kumar Shrestha

The study finds exploratory evidence that gender moderates how youth perceive privacy risks and benefits, influencing their protective behavior when using smart voice assistants.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

"The System Will Choose Security Over Humanity Every Time": Understanding Security and Privacy for U.S. Incarcerated Users

Yael Eiger, Nino Migineishvili, Emi Yoshikawa, Liza Nadtochiy +2 more

The paper investigates how digital devices in U.S. prisons create privacy and security risks for incarcerated users, finding that pervasive surveillance and arbitrary policies negatively impact their…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentMay 22, 2026

When Youth Enter the Algorithmic Wild: Discovering and Understanding Potentially Harmful Teen Videos on Douyin and Kwai

Shaoxuan Zhou, Yafei Sun, Jing Zhang, Xianghang Mi

The paper introduces PHTV-Scout, a novel framework that analyzes Douyin and Kwai data, revealing a high prevalence of potentially harmful teen videos, particularly CSE imagery, and demonstrating that…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYcs.HCRecentApr 8, 2026

Understanding Data Collection, Brokerage, and Spam in the Lead Marketing Ecosystem

Yash Vekaria, Nurullah Demir, Konrad Kollnig, Zubair Shafiq

The paper empirically investigates the lead marketing ecosystem, revealing a highly non-compliant system that aggressively collects, shares, and monetizes sensitive personal data through deceptive bro…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Lost in Delusion: Examining LLM Safety Under User Delusions and Distress

Andrew Aquilina, Chetna Nihalani, Vasudha Varadarajan, Nathan S. Fishbein +2 more

The paper finds that while LLMs can detect distress regardless of delusional framing, they significantly fail to intervene safely when distress is intertwined with delusion, suggesting a critical reco…

View →