ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.03822v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.SCRecentMay 25, 2026

Heimdall: Formally Verified Automated Migration of Legacy eBPF Programs to Rust

Vishnu Asutosh Dasu, Monika Santra, Md Rafi Ur Rashid, Ashish Kumar +2 more

The paper introduces Heimdall, an automated pipeline that uses LLMs and formal verification to safely and automatically migrate legacy, potentially buggy eBPF programs written in C to memory-safe Rust…

View →
cs.CRcs.PLcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

Symbolic Execution Meets Multi-LLM Orchestration: Detecting Memory Vulnerabilities in Incomplete Rust CVE Snippets

Zeyad Abdelrazek, Young Lee

The paper introduces a novel multi-LLM orchestration system combined with symbolic execution to successfully detect memory vulnerabilities in uncompilable, incomplete Rust CVE code snippets, achieving…

View →
cs.PLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

SEMBridge: Tagless-Final Program Semantics with Weakest-Precondition and Bounded-Checking Interpretations

Eric Liang

SEMBridge is a tagless-final framework that allows a single executable object program to generate multiple program semantics, including weakest-precondition and bounded-checking interpretations, ensur…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

AutoSOUP: Safety-Oriented Unit Proof Generation for Component-level Memory-Safety Verification

Paschal C. Amusuo, Ricardo Calvo, Dharun Anandayuvaraj, Taylor Le Lievre +4 more

AutoSOUP is a system that automates component-level memory-safety verification by generating Safety-Oriented Unit Proofs, leveraging a hybrid LLM-based architecture to overcome manual workflow limitat…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

On the Foundations of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

TJ Dunham

The paper proves that platform-deterministic inference is a necessary and sufficient condition for trustworthy AI, establishing that AI trust fundamentally relies on consistent arithmetic.

View →
cs.CLcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

Combinatorial Synthesis: Scaling Code RLVR via Atomic Decomposition and Recombination

Jiasheng Zheng, Boxi Cao, Boxi Yu, Yuzhong Zhang +5 more

The paper introduces Atomic Decomposition and Recombination (ADR), a novel framework that generates genuinely novel and challenging verifiable code tasks, significantly improving the scalability of Re…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Guiding Symbolic Execution with Static Analysis and LLMs for Vulnerability Discovery

Md Shafiuzzaman, Achintya Desai, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik Bultan

SAILOR automates the construction of symbolic execution harnesses by combining static analysis and LLM-based synthesis, significantly improving the scalability and effectiveness of vulnerability disco…

View →
cs.LOcs.CEcs.ETRecentJun 1, 2026

Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems

Pierre Falda

The paper proposes a federated formal verification architecture that treats verification as a polyglot proof system, successfully validating it on complex production subsystems like a Raft consensus m…

View →
cs.CRcs.OSRecentMay 30, 2026

Beyond Edge Coverage: Per-Task Data-Flow Extraction at Kernel Function Boundaries via LLVM

Yunseong Kim

The paper introduces BOUNDARY FLOW, an LLVM-based framework that enhances kernel fuzzing and analysis by extracting per-task, state-aware data-flow information (arguments and return values) at functio…

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LORecentApr 25, 2026

From Language to Logic: Bridging LLMs & Formal Representations for RTL Assertion Generation

Nowfel Mashnoor, Hadi Kamali, Kimia Azar

The paper introduces ProofLoop, a novel ReAct agent that uses a solver-in-the-loop approach to automatically generate and formally verify SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA) from natural language specifica…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Bridging Code Property Graphs and Language Models for Program Analysis

Ahmed Lekssays

The paper introduces codebadger, a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates Joern's Code Property Graph (CPG) with LLMs, enabling large language models to perform large-scale, semantic prog…

View →
cs.CRcs.LORecentApr 14, 2026

COBALT-TLA: A Neuro-Symbolic Verification Loop for Cross-Chain Bridge Vulnerability Discovery

Dominik Blain

COBALT-TLA introduces a neuro-symbolic verification loop that successfully and autonomously discovers novel cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities by integrating an LLM with the TLA+ model checker.

View →
cs.SEcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Improving Small Language Models for Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Verification Feedback

Egor Skopin, Evgeny Kotelnikov

The paper demonstrates that using Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly improves small language models' functional correctness in code generation, particularly when combi…

View →
cs.DCcs.CRRecentApr 26, 2026

Towards System-Oriented Formal Verification of Local-First Access Control

Florian Jacob, Johanna Stuber, Hannes Hartenstein

The paper proposes a bottom-up, system-oriented approach to formally verify authorization algorithms for large-scale, Byzantine fault-tolerant local-first systems, using Rust and the Verus framework.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

FVSpec: Real-World Property-Based Tests as Lean Challenges

Quinn Dougherty, Max von Hippel, Hazel Shackleton, Mike Dodds

The paper introduces FVSpec, a large-scale benchmark that translates thousands of real-world Python property-based tests into formal Lean 4 specifications to evaluate AI models for formal software ver…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Residual Risk Analysis in Benign Code: How Far Are We? A Multi-Model Semantic and Structural Similarity Approach

Mohammad Farhad, Shuvalaxmi Dass

The paper proposes a Residual Risk Scoring (RRS) framework that uses combined semantic and structural similarity analysis to estimate potential residual security risks in code after patching, finding…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →