ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.04499v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentMar 23, 2026

STRIATUM-CTF: A Protocol-Driven Agentic Framework for General-Purpose CTF Solving

James Hugglestone, Samuel Jacob Chacko, Dawson Stoller, Ryan Schmidt +1 more

The paper introduces STRIATUM-CTF, a modular agentic framework that uses a standardized context protocol to enable LLMs to perform multi-step, stateful reasoning for general-purpose CTF solving, achie…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

Red-MIRROR: Agentic LLM-based Autonomous Penetration Testing with Reflective Verification and Knowledge-augmented Interaction

Tran Vy Khang, Nguyen Dang Nguyen Khang, Nghi Hoang Khoa, Do Thi Thu Hien +2 more

Red-MIRROR is a novel multi-agent LLM system that automates complex web penetration testing by integrating a memory-reflection backbone, achieving superior performance on industry benchmarks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 22, 2026

DeepXplain: XAI-Guided Autonomous Defense Against Multi-Stage APT Campaigns

Trung V. Phan, Thomas Bauschert

DeepXplain introduces an explainable deep reinforcement learning framework that enhances the trustworthiness and effectiveness of autonomous cyber defense against multi-stage APT campaigns by integrat…

View →
cs.CRcs.MARecentJun 4, 2026

ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense

Anlan Zheng, Tiantian Zhu

ZERO-APT introduces a novel closed-loop adversarial framework for automated penetration testing that simulates attacks against an intelligent, real-time defending system, achieving a high attack succe…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing

Jiaren Peng, Zeqin Li, Chang You, Yan Wang +16 more

This paper provides the first comprehensive systematization and large-scale empirical evaluation of existing LLM-based Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT) frameworks, offering a structured taxonomy…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 6, 2026

Strengthening Human-Centric Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Integrity in LLMs via a Structured Prompt Framework

Jiling Zhou, Aisvarya Adeseye, Seppo Virtanen, Antti Hakkala +1 more

The paper proposes a structured prompt engineering framework to enhance the integrity and reliability of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in LLMs, demonstrating significant improvements in security-se…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World

Pedro Conde, Henrique Branquinho, Valerio Mazzone, Bruno Mendes +2 more

The paper introduces a novel, practical evaluation protocol that shifts the assessment of AI pentesting agents from simple task completion to validated, open-ended vulnerability discovery in complex,…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

LAAF: Logic-layer Automated Attack Framework A Systematic Red-Teaming Methodology for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Model Systems

Hammad Atta, Ken Huang, Kyriakos Rock Lambros, Yasir Mehmood +10 more

The paper introduces LAAF, a novel automated red-teaming framework, to systematically test and exploit Logic-layer Prompt Control Injection (LPCI) vulnerabilities in complex agentic LLM systems.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 23, 2026

AutoRISE: Agent-Driven Strategy Evolution for Red-Teaming Large Language Models

Tanmay Gautam, Alireza Bahramali, Sandeep Atluri

AutoRISE proposes optimizing the entire attack strategy—by searching over executable programs—rather than just optimizing prompts, achieving significant improvements in red-teaming large language mode…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 9, 2026

When LLMs Team Up: A Coordinated Attack Framework for Automated Cyber Intrusions

Minfeng Qi, Tianqing Zhu, Zijie Xu, Congcong Zhu +2 more

The paper introduces CAESAR, a novel multi-agent framework that coordinates LLM agents across five specialized roles to improve success rates and stability in complex, multi-stage cyber intrusion task…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 24, 2026

APT-Agent: Automated Penetration Testing using Large Language Models

William Guanting Li, Alsharif Abuadbba, Kristen Moore, Dan Dongseong Kim

The paper introduces APT-Agent, an automated LLM-driven framework that significantly improves penetration testing success rates by mitigating LLM hallucinations and maintaining long-term operational c…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 3, 2026

Towards Secure Agent Skills: Architecture, Threat Taxonomy, and Security Analysis

Zhiyuan Li, Jingzheng Wu, Xiang Ling, Xing Cui +1 more

This paper provides the first comprehensive security analysis of the Agent Skills framework, identifying severe structural vulnerabilities that require fundamental architectural changes rather than si…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 10, 2026

Operationalizing Cybersecurity Governance for Mitigation Planning with Attack-Path Modeling and Reinforcement Learning

Philip Huff, Dakota Dale, Harshith Guduru, Rohan Singh +1 more

The paper proposes a system that operationalizes cybersecurity governance frameworks by integrating them with attack-path modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate practical, resource-const…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 11, 2026

PlanGuard: Defending Agents against Indirect Prompt Injection via Planning-based Consistency Verification

Guangyu Gong, Zizhuang Deng

PlanGuard is a training-free defense framework that uses an isolated Planner and hierarchical verification to defend LLM agents against Indirect Prompt Injection by verifying the consistency of planne…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

SoK: The Attack Surface of Agentic AI -- Tools, and Autonomy

Ali Dehghantanha, Sajad Homayoun

This paper systematically maps the expanded attack surface of agentic AI systems, identifying new threat vectors like RAG poisoning and cross-agent manipulation, and proposes a comprehensive security…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 28, 2026

"Elementary, My Dear Watson." Detecting Malicious Skills via Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning across Heterogeneous Artifacts

Shenao Wang, Junjie He, Yanjie Zhao, Yayi Wang +2 more

The paper introduces MalSkills, a neuro-symbolic framework that detects malicious skills in the expanding agentic supply chain by analyzing security-sensitive operations across heterogeneous artifacts…

View →
cs.CRcs.CVRecentApr 1, 2026

AutoMIA: Improved Baselines for Membership Inference Attack via Agentic Self-Exploration

Ruhao Liu, Weiqi Huang, Qi Li, Xinchao Wang

AutoMIA introduces an agentic framework that automates the process of Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) by self-exploring the attack space, achieving state-of-the-art performance without manual feat…

View →