ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.07830v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 21, 2026

Benchmarking Autonomous Agents against Temporal, Spatial, and Semantic Evasions

Jianan Ma, Xiaohu Du, Ruixiao Lin, Yaoxiang Bian +7 more

The paper introduces a multi-dimensional evasion framework and a new benchmark (A3S-Bench) to test autonomous agents, demonstrating that stateful, multi-turn attacks significantly increase system risk…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 29, 2026

Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look

Youness Bouchari, Matteo Boffa, Marco Mellia, Idilio Drago +2 more

The paper re-evaluates LLM agents on CTFs, finding that while general-purpose agents like claude-code are strong baselines, specialized, modular architectures significantly improve performance and con…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 19, 2026

The Autonomy Tax: Defense Training Breaks LLM Agents

Shawn Li, Yue Zhao

Defense training for LLM agents, intended to improve safety, systematically degrades their core competence, leading to unreliability in multi-step tasks.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 4, 2026

AttackEval: A Systematic Empirical Study of Prompt Injection Attack Effectiveness Against Large Language Models

Jackson Wang

AttackEval systematically evaluates the effectiveness of 250 prompt injection prompts across ten attack categories, finding that composite and obfuscation attacks are highly effective against current…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights

Saba Pourhanifeh, AbdulAziz AbdulGhaffar, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper empirically evaluates domain-adapted and general-purpose LLMs for structured threat modelling (STRIDE on 5G security), finding that domain adaptation and model size do not guarantee reliable…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 27, 2026

Dynamic Cyber Ranges

Víctor Mayoral-Vilches, María Sanz-Gómez, Francesco Balassone, Maite Del Mundo De Torres +5 more

The paper proposes Dynamic Cyber Ranges, an advanced cyber range environment using LLM-driven Defender agents to counter the saturation of traditional security benchmarks, demonstrating that these dyn…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 23, 2026

Black-Box Skill Stealing Attack from Proprietary LLM Agents: An Empirical Study

Zihan Wang, Rui Zhang, Yu Liu, Chi Liu +3 more

This paper presents the first systematic study of black-box skill stealing attacks against proprietary LLM agents, demonstrating that structured agent skills can be easily extracted, posing a signific…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 21, 2026

Blind Spots in the Guard: How Domain-Camouflaged Injection Attacks Evade Detection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Aaditya Pai

The paper identifies a critical vulnerability, the Camouflage Detection Gap (CDG), where standard LLM injection detectors fail dramatically when malicious payloads mimic the target domain's language a…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 8, 2026

Defense effectiveness across architectural layers: a mechanistic evaluation of persistent memory attacks on stateful LLM agents

Jun Wen Leong

The paper systematically evaluates various defense mechanisms against persistent memory attacks on LLM agents, finding that only tool-gating at the memory layer (Memory Sandbox) effectively mitigates…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 3, 2026

Domain-Conditioned Safety in Frontier Computer-Using Agents: A 793-Episode Browser Benchmark, a Coding-Domain Cross-Reference, and a Reproducibility Audit of Recent Red-Teaming

Nicholas Saban

The paper benchmarks current frontier computer-using agents against hand-crafted attacks, finding that while they are highly safe in browser tasks, this safety does not generalize to other domains lik…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Plant, Persist, Trigger: Sleeper Attack on Large Language Model Agents

Yongxiang Li, Moxin Li, Zhixin Ma, Fengbin Zhu +3 more

This paper introduces the concept of 'Sleeper Attack,' demonstrating that adversarial content can persist across multiple interactions with an LLM agent, posing a more subtle and difficult-to-detect s…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these honeypots provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these systems provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect i…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 24, 2026

Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions

Wenjuan Li, Yitao Liu, Runze Chen, Rajkumar Buyya

This paper provides a systematic, lifecycle-based framework for analyzing security threats and defenses across the entire fine-tuning process of LLMs, revealing that attack effectiveness is highly mod…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 14, 2026

Talk is (Not) Cheap: A Taxonomy and Benchmark Coverage Audit for LLM Attacks

Karthik Raghu Iyer, Yazdan Jamshidi, Nicholas Bray, Alexey A. Shvets

The paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy and auditing framework to assess the collective coverage of existing LLM attack benchmarks, revealing significant and systematic gaps in current testing m…

View →