ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.10834v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

Red-MIRROR: Agentic LLM-based Autonomous Penetration Testing with Reflective Verification and Knowledge-augmented Interaction

Tran Vy Khang, Nguyen Dang Nguyen Khang, Nghi Hoang Khoa, Do Thi Thu Hien +2 more

Red-MIRROR is a novel multi-agent LLM system that automates complex web penetration testing by integrating a memory-reflection backbone, achieving superior performance on industry benchmarks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 29, 2026

Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look

Youness Bouchari, Matteo Boffa, Marco Mellia, Idilio Drago +2 more

The paper re-evaluates LLM agents on CTFs, finding that while general-purpose agents like claude-code are strong baselines, specialized, modular architectures significantly improve performance and con…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 13, 2026

ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agents

Seunghyun Lee, David Brumley

The paper introduces ExploitBench, a capability-graded benchmark that measures the progressive stages of exploitation, demonstrating that while current frontier models can easily trigger bugs, achievi…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges

Ali Al-Kaswan, Maksim Plotnikov, Maxim Hájek, Roland Vízner +2 more

The paper introduces DeepRed, a new benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic CTF challenges, finding that current agents are limited, achieving only 35% average checkpoint completion.

View →
cs.CRcs.MARecentJun 4, 2026

ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense

Anlan Zheng, Tiantian Zhu

ZERO-APT introduces a novel closed-loop adversarial framework for automated penetration testing that simulates attacks against an intelligent, real-time defending system, achieving a high attack succe…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

AgentTrust is a novel runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates AI agent tool calls before execution, achieving high accuracy in detecting unsafe actions across complex and obfuscated scenari…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents

Faruk Alpay, Taylan Alpay

The paper introduces AgentSecBench, a security evaluation framework that measures prompt injection, privacy leakage, and tool-use integrity in LLM agents by defining formal security games and testing…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 19, 2026

ClawTrap: A MITM-Based Red-Teaming Framework for Real-World OpenClaw Security Evaluation

Haochen Zhao, Shaoyang Cui

The paper introduces ClawTrap, a MITM-based red-teaming framework, to evaluate the security robustness of web agents like OpenClaw against dynamic, real-world network attacks, finding that model stren…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these honeypots provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these systems provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect i…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discovery

Hanzhi Liu, Chaofan Shou, Xiaonan Liu, Hongbo Wen +3 more

The paper introduces AgentFlow, a novel framework that uses a typed graph DSL and feedback-driven optimization to automatically synthesize and improve multi-agent harnesses for discovering security vu…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 4, 2026

When Agents Handle Secrets: A Survey of Confidential Computing for Agentic AI

Javad Forough, Marios Kogias, Hamed Haddadi

This survey analyzes the unique security threats posed by complex, multi-agent AI systems and proposes Confidential Computing (CC) using Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) as a hardware-rooted defe…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 12, 2026

Proteus: A Self-Evolving Red Team for Agent Skill Ecosystems

Zhaojiacheng Zhou

The paper introduces Proteus, a self-evolving red-team framework that measures the adaptive leakage risk of LLM agent skills, demonstrating that current vetting methods significantly underestimate res…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentJun 2, 2026

FORGE: Multi-Agent Graduated Exploitation and Detection Engineering

Farooq Shaikh

FORGE is a multi-agent system that integrates vulnerability exploitation, prioritization, and detection engineering into a single pipeline, achieving high-fidelity, multi-level exploitation and genera…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 12, 2026

Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack

Hao Wang, Hanchen Li, Qiuyang Mang, Alvin Cheung +2 more

The paper introduces BenchJack, an automated red-teaming system that systematically audits popular AI agent benchmarks, revealing numerous reward-hacking exploits and demonstrating a method to signifi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks?

Zhun Wang, Nico Schiller, Hongwei Li, Srijiith Sesha Narayana +12 more

The paper introduces ExploitGym, a large-scale benchmark, demonstrating that advanced AI agents can successfully turn theoretical software vulnerabilities into working exploits, highlighting growing c…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 22, 2026

When the Manual Lies: A Realistic Benchmark to Evaluate MCP Poisoning Attacks for LLM Agents

Shi Liu, Xuehai Tang, Xikang Yang, Liang Lin +3 more

This paper introduces a new benchmark to test Tool Description Poisoning (TDP) attacks on LLM agents, demonstrating that even advanced models like GPT-4o are highly vulnerable and that current defense…

View →