ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.11163v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 5, 2026

Tailored Prompts, Targeted Protection: Vulnerability-Specific LLM Analysis for Smart Contracts

Xing Zhang, Keyu Zhang, Taohong Zhu, Anbang Ruan

The paper introduces an LLM-based framework that uses vulnerability-specific prompting and a large-scale dataset to achieve high-precision, scalable detection of multiple smart contract vulnerabilitie…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Security of LLM-generated Code: A Comparative Analysis

Srivathsan G Morkonda, Mahmoud Selim, Hala Assal

This paper empirically evaluates the security of code generated by seven popular LLMs and finds that all evaluated models generate code containing critical or high-severity vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 2, 2026

Decoupled Smart Contract Audits: Lightweight LLM Framework via Distillation and Aggregation

Bagus Rakadyanto Oktavianto Putra, Muhamad Risqi Utama Saputra, Widyawan, Guntur Dharma Putra

The paper introduces an efficient, lightweight LLM framework for smart contract auditing that decouples the audit process into multiple components, achieving high accuracy while significantly reducing…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 29, 2026

Neuroforger: certified violation witnesses for smart contracts verification via LLMs

Massimo Bartoletti, Enrico Lipparini

The paper introduces Neuroforger, a system that combines a new formal specification language with LLMs and type checking to reliably generate and validate concrete violation witnesses (counterexamples…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

LibScan: Smart Contract Library Misuse Detection with Iterative Feedback and Static Verification

Yishun Wang, Wenkai Li, Xiaoqi Li, Zongwei Li +2 more

LibScan is an automated framework that detects eight categories of smart contract library misuse by combining LLM-based semantic reasoning with rule-based analysis, achieving 85.15% accuracy on real-w…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 5, 2026

LLM-Enabled Open-Source Systems in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in GitHub Security Advisories

Fariha Tanjim Shifat, Hariswar Baburaj, Ce Zhou, Jaydeb Sarker +1 more

The paper analyzes GitHub security advisories for LLM-integrated open-source systems, finding that while most vulnerabilities map to existing code-level weaknesses, the architectural risks like Supply…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

Natural Language based Specification and Verification

Zhaorui Li, Chengyu Song

This paper proposes using large language models (LLMs) to generate and compositionally verify software implementations directly from natural language specifications, showing promising preliminary resu…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 29, 2026

An Empirical Security Evaluation of LLM-Generated Cryptographic Rust Code

Mohamed Elsayed, Kenneth Fulton, Jeong Yang

This study empirically evaluates the cryptographic security of LLM-generated Rust code, finding that while general analysis tools are insufficient, a custom crypto-specific analyzer successfully ident…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 11, 2026

Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

Souradip Nath, Chih-Yi Huang, Aditi Ganapathi, Kashyap Thimmaraju +2 more

Analyzing Reddit discussions, the paper finds that while security practitioners see LLMs as useful for boosting productivity, their adoption is constrained by concerns over reliability, verification,…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentMar 19, 2026

Implicit Patterns in LLM-Based Binary Analysis

Qiang Li, XiangRui Zhang, Haining Wang

This paper analyzes large-scale reasoning traces from LLM-based binary vulnerability analysis, identifying four structured, token-level implicit patterns that govern how LLMs explore code paths.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Attesting LLM Pipelines: Enforcing Verifiable Training and Release Claims

Zhuoran Tan, Jeremy Singer, Christos Anagnostopoulos

The paper proposes an attestation-aware promotion gate to mitigate supply-chain risks in LLM pipelines by cryptographically verifying and enforcing claims about training and release artifacts before d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Based Secure Code Generation

Mohammed F. Kharma, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Ahmed Sabbah, David Mohaisen

The paper introduces the Mitigation-Aware Chain-of-Thought (MA-CoT) framework, which significantly enhances the security reliability of code generated by LLMs across multiple languages and models.

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

SCDBench: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Smart Contract Decompilers

Kaihua Qin, Dawn Song, Arthur Gervais

The paper introduces SCDBench, a comprehensive benchmark dataset and methodology that rigorously evaluates LLM-based smart contract decompilers, finding that while frontier models can produce compilab…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

SCDBench: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Smart Contract Decompilers

Kaihua Qin, Dawn Song, Arthur Gervais

The paper introduces SCDBench, a comprehensive benchmark dataset and methodology that rigorously evaluates LLM-based smart contract decompilers, finding that while frontier LLMs can generate compilabl…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 16, 2026

Feedback-Driven Execution for LLM-Based Binary Analysis

XiangRui Zhang, Qiang Li, Haining Wang

The paper introduces FORGE, a feedback-driven execution system that improves LLM-based binary analysis by interleaving reasoning and tool interaction, achieving high-quality vulnerability discovery on…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 28, 2026

The Surprising Universality of LLM Outputs: A Real-Time Verification Primitive

Alex Bogdan, Adrian de Valois-Franklin

The paper identifies a universal, statistically predictable distribution (Mandelbrot) governing LLM outputs, enabling a highly efficient, model-agnostic scoring primitive for provenance and quality as…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →