ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.15249v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Protecting On-Device AI Inference: A Systematic Review of Attacks and Defence Mechanisms

Zisis Tsiatsikas, Alexandros Fakis, Georgios Karopoulos, Vasileios Kouliaridis +1 more

This paper provides the first comprehensive review of threats and defenses specifically targeting on-device AI inference, revealing a significant imbalance where certain attack types, like adversarial…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Landseer: Exploring the Machine Learning Defense Landscape

Ayushi Sharma, Rosemary Agbozo, Santiago Torres-Arias, Zahra Ghodsi

The paper introduces Landseer, a modular framework designed to systematically evaluate and compose multiple machine learning defenses to address complex, real-world security requirements.

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

A No-Defense Defense Against Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on ML-NIDS: Is Less More?

Mohamed elShehaby, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper demonstrates that simpler, shallower Deep Neural Network architectures with reduced features and ReLU activations can inherently improve the robustness of ML-NIDS against gradient-based adve…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMar 26, 2026

Mitigating Evasion Attacks in Fog Computing Resource Provisioning Through Proactive Hardening

Younes Salmi, Hanna Bogucka

This paper proposes using adversarial training to proactively harden the k-means clustering classifier, thereby mitigating evasion attacks that threaten resource provisioning stability in fog computin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 14, 2026

One Step to the Side: Why Defenses Against Malicious Finetuning Fail Under Adaptive Adversaries

Itay Zloczower, Eyal Lenga, Gilad Gressel, Yisroel Mirsky

The paper demonstrates that current defenses against malicious fine-tuning of foundation models are insufficient because they only address fixed attacks, and introduces a unified adaptive attack that…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

FlowGuard: Flow Matching for Identity-Independent Detection of Data-Free Model Stealing Attacks on Energy System Intrusion Detection Systems

Maxime Schwarzer, Laurin Holz, Tobias Huerten, Johannes Loevenich +3 more

FlowGuard introduces an identity-independent defense using flow matching to detect data-free model stealing attacks by identifying synthetic queries as out-of-distribution based on their lower-dimensi…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentJun 3, 2026

Toward a Generalized Defense Across Sparse, Continuous, and Structured Parameter Attacks

Bin Duan, Zeyu Bai, Guowei Yang

The paper introduces ParDef, a generalized defense mechanism that effectively mitigates various types of parameter attacks on deep neural networks while maintaining high performance.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

Adversarial Vulnerability Under Temporal Concept Drift: A Longitudinal Study of Android Malware Detection

Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammed Kharma, Radi Jarrar, Samer Zein +1 more

This study longitudinally evaluates the adversarial robustness of Android malware detection systems over a decade, finding that temporal separation significantly degrades robustness due to concept dri…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 9, 2026

AESOP: Adversarial Execution-path Selection to Overload Deep Learning Pipelines

Tingxi Li, Mingfang Ji, Ravishka Shemal Rathnasuriya, Simin Chen +2 more

AESOP introduces an adversarial attack that targets the entire execution path of deep learning pipelines, demonstrating that path-aware selection can inflate computational costs by orders of magnitude…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 25, 2026

AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective

Zhenyi Wang, Siyu Luan

The paper proposes a unified closed-loop threat taxonomy to systematically analyze and defend foundation models by explicitly framing the bidirectional security interactions between data and models.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

AI Model Extraction Attacks: Bypassing Single-Client Assumptions in Defenses

Maxime Schwarzer, Johannes F. Loevenich, Gustavo Sánchez, Laurin Holz +4 more

This paper demonstrates that current AI model extraction defenses, which assume attacks come from single sources, are easily bypassed by coordinated, distributed threat actors.

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 13, 2026

Model-Agnostic Lifelong LLM Safety via Externalized Attack-Defense Co-Evolution

Xiaozhe Zhang, Chaozhuo Li, Hui Liu, Shaocheng Yan +3 more

The EvoSafety framework enhances LLM safety by externalizing attack and defense mechanisms, enabling persistent, transferable, and model-agnostic robustness against adversarial prompts.

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMar 31, 2026

Dummy-Aware Weighted Attack (DAWA): Breaking the Safe Sink in Dummy Class Defenses

Yunrui Yu, Xuxiang Feng, Pengda Qin, Pengyang Wang +4 more

The paper introduces Dummy-Aware Weighted Attack (DAWA), a novel evaluation method that significantly reduces the reported robustness of Dummy Classes-based defenses by simultaneously targeting both t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 24, 2026

The Cognitive Firewall:Securing Browser Based AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection Via Hybrid Edge Cloud Defense

Qianlong Lan, Anuj Kaul

The Cognitive Firewall is a hybrid edge-cloud defense architecture that significantly reduces the attack success rate of Indirect Prompt Injection against browser-based AI agents by combining local vi…

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMar 23, 2026

Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogates

Samrendra Roy, Kazuma Kobayashi, Souvik Chakraborty, Rizwan-uddin +1 more

This paper demonstrates that neural operators used in digital twins for nuclear systems are highly vulnerable to undetectable, sparse adversarial perturbations, necessitating new robustness guarantees…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 24, 2026

Targeted Adversarial Traffic Generation : Black-box Approach to Evade Intrusion Detection Systems in IoT Networks

Islam Debicha, Tayeb Kenaza, Ishak Charfi, Salah Mosbah +2 more

This paper evaluates a novel black-box adversarial attack to demonstrate the vulnerability of ML-based IoT Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and proposes a robust defense mechanism to mitigate these e…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 24, 2026

Training a General Purpose Automated Red Teaming Model

Aishwarya Padmakumar, Leon Derczynski, Traian Rebedea, Christopher Parisien

The paper proposes a general-purpose pipeline to train automated red teaming models capable of generating attacks for arbitrary adversarial goals, overcoming the limitations of current methods that ar…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 21, 2026

Blind Spots in the Guard: How Domain-Camouflaged Injection Attacks Evade Detection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Aaditya Pai

The paper identifies a critical vulnerability, the Camouflage Detection Gap (CDG), where standard LLM injection detectors fail dramatically when malicious payloads mimic the target domain's language a…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

When Safe Models Merge into Danger: Exploiting Latent Vulnerabilities in LLM Fusion

Jiaqing Li, Zhibo Zhang, Shide Zhou, Yuxi Li +2 more

The paper introduces TrojanMerge, a framework demonstrating that model merging can be exploited to systematically compromise the safety alignment of multiple individually safe LLMs.

View →