ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.19999v1· 20 results

cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

The Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Report

Jonathan Katzy, Ali Al-Kaswan, Razvan Mihai Popescu, Zhou Yang

The paper organizes the first Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Competition to detect a large language model's prior exposure to training data without access to the full training corpus.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 3, 2026

Search-Time Contamination in Deep Research Agents: Measuring Performance Inflation in Public Benchmark Evaluation

Yongjie Wang, Xinyue Zhang, Kunhong Yao, Zhiwei Zeng +3 more

The paper introduces the concept of Search-Time Contamination (STC), demonstrating that deep research agents can leak information from public benchmarks via web search, leading to an overestimation of…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

LaRA: Layer-wise Representation Analysis for Detecting Data Contamination in RL Post-Training

Minju Gwak, Minseo Kwak, Dongseok Lee, Guijin Son +2 more

The paper proposes LaRA, a layer-wise representation analysis framework that detects data contamination in RL post-trained LLMs by analyzing geometric deviations across model layers.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentApr 30, 2026

REBENCH: A Procedural, Fair-by-Construction Benchmark for LLMs on Stripped-Binary Types and Names (Extended Version)

Jun Yeon Won, Xin Jin, Shiqing Ma, Zhiqiang Lin

The paper introduces REBench, a comprehensive, standardized benchmark dataset designed to enable fair and rigorous evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex binary reverse engineering task…

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMs

Nhat Minh Le, Yisen Xu, Zhijie Wang, Tse-Hsun +1 more

This paper evaluates the performance of large language models on popular benchmarks and finds that only a small percentage of the performant implementations are significantly faster than canonical sol…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

DataShield: Safety-degrading Data Filtering for LLM Benign Instruction Fine-Tuning

Junbo Zhang, Qianli Zhou, Xinyang Deng, Wen Jiang +2 more

DataShield proposes an efficient method to identify safety-degrading samples within benign datasets, preventing the degradation of LLM safety capabilities during fine-tuning.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

DataShield: Safety-degrading Data Filtering for LLM Benign Instruction Fine-Tuning

Junbo Zhang, Qianli Zhou, Xinyang Deng, Wen Jiang +2 more

DataShield proposes an efficient method to identify safety-degrading samples within benign datasets, quantifying each sample's contribution to an LLM's compliance behavior.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Auditing LLM Benchmarks with Item Response Theory

Sander Land, Daniel M. Bikel

The paper introduces an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based indicator that effectively identifies likely mislabeled items in existing LLM benchmarks, revealing systematic errors in labeling and model spe…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 28, 2026

The Surprising Universality of LLM Outputs: A Real-Time Verification Primitive

Alex Bogdan, Adrian de Valois-Franklin

The paper identifies a universal, statistically predictable distribution (Mandelbrot) governing LLM outputs, enabling a highly efficient, model-agnostic scoring primitive for provenance and quality as…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Combating Data Laundering in LLM Training

Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu

The paper introduces Synthesis Data Reversion (SDR), a method that infers the data laundering transformation used in LLM training and synthesizes queries to restore the detection signals lost when pro…

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 1, 2026

ML-Bench&Guard: Policy-Grounded Multilingual Safety Benchmark and Guardrail for Large Language Models

Yunhan Zhao, Zhaorun Chen, Xingjun Ma, Yu-Gang Jiang +1 more

The paper introduces ML-Bench, a policy-grounded multilingual safety benchmark, and ML-Guard, a superior guardrail model that enables culturally and legally aligned safety assessment for LLMs across 1…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentJun 3, 2026

Willing but Unable: Separating Refusal from Capability in Code LLMs via Abliteration

Cristina Carleo, Pietro Liguori, Naghmeh Ivaki, Domenico Cotroneo

The paper introduces 'abliteration,' a weight editing technique that successfully bypasses the refusal mechanism of safety-aligned Code LLMs, enabling scalable synthesis of vulnerable code from safe i…

View →
cs.CRcs.CVRecentApr 17, 2026

TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models

Chaoshuo Zhang, Yibo Liang, Mengke Tian, Chenhao Lin +5 more

This paper introduces TwoHamsters, a new benchmark that rigorously tests Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety (MCCU) in text-to-image models, demonstrating that current state-of-the-art models and saf…

View →
cs.DCcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Not All Errors Are Equal: A Systematic Study of Error Propagation in Large Language Model Inference

Yafan Huang, Sheng Di, Guanpeng Li

This paper systematically studies how soft errors propagate during Large Language Model (LLM) inference using a novel fault-injection framework, providing critical insights and mitigation strategies f…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets

Ana Gjorgjevikj, Barbara Koroušić Seljak, Tome Eftimov

This paper introduces robustness indicators to systematically analyze how multilingual text embedding model rankings change based on dataset composition and aggregation methods, revealing that only a…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →