ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.21095v1· 20 results

cs.CYcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

AI Loss of Control Incident Management: Response & Resilience

Ross Gruetzemacher

This paper introduces a foundational framework and taxonomy for managing catastrophic AI loss of control (LOC) incidents, providing a proportional guide for response based on the severity and recovera…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

From AI-Generated Content to Agentic Action: Security and Safety Threats in Generative AI

Zelin Zhang, Qi Li, Jie Cao, Lingshuang Liu +1 more

The paper analyzes the escalating security and safety threats posed by generative AI systems as they transition from merely generating content to executing real-world actions via tools and agents, fin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 20, 2026

Owner-Harm: A Missing Threat Model for AI Agent Safety

Dongcheng Zhang, Yiqing Jiang

The paper introduces Owner-Harm, a formal threat model addressing the critical blind spot of AI agents harming their own deployers, demonstrating that specialized defenses are needed beyond generic sa…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 26, 2026

Structural Enforcement of Goal Integrity in AI Agents via Separation-of-Powers Architecture

Rong Xiang

The paper proposes the Policy-Execution-Authorization (PEA) architecture, a separation-of-powers system designed to structurally enforce goal integrity in AI agents, moving safety from a probabilistic…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 30, 2026

Design Principles for the Construction of a Benchmark Evaluating Security Operation Capabilities of Multi-agent AI Systems

Yicheng Cai, Mitchell John DeStefano, Guodong Dong, Pulkit Handa +4 more

This paper proposes a set of design principles and a conceptual benchmark (SOC-bench) to systematically evaluate the blue team operational capabilities of multi-agent AI systems in autonomous Security…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

When the Agent Is the Adversary: Architectural Requirements for Agentic AI Containment After the April 2026 Frontier Model Escape

Richard Joseph Mitchell

The paper analyzes the failure modes of current AI containment methods when the agent itself is the adversary, deriving five necessary architectural requirements for durable safety.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 15, 2026

SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deployment

Xixun Lin, Yang Liu, Yancheng Chen, Yongxuan Wu +7 more

The paper introduces SafeHarness, a novel, lifecycle-integrated security architecture that significantly reduces unsafe behavior and attack success rates in LLM agents by weaving multiple defense laye…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 21, 2026

Benchmarking Autonomous Agents against Temporal, Spatial, and Semantic Evasions

Jianan Ma, Xiaohu Du, Ruixiao Lin, Yaoxiang Bian +7 more

The paper introduces a multi-dimensional evasion framework and a new benchmark (A3S-Bench) to test autonomous agents, demonstrating that stateful, multi-turn attacks significantly increase system risk…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

MATRA: Modeling the Attack Surface of Agentic AI Systems -- OpenClaw Case Study

Tim Van hamme, Thomas Vissers, Javier Carnerero-Cano, Mario Fritz +3 more

The paper introduces MATRA, a systematic threat modeling framework, to assess how known LLM threats translate into concrete, deployment-specific risks within autonomous agentic AI systems.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

SoK: The Attack Surface of Agentic AI -- Tools, and Autonomy

Ali Dehghantanha, Sajad Homayoun

This paper systematically maps the expanded attack surface of agentic AI systems, identifying new threat vectors like RAG poisoning and cross-agent manipulation, and proposes a comprehensive security…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 10, 2026

The Authorization-Execution Gap Is a Major Safety and Security Problem in Open-World Agents

Baoyuan Wu, Qingshan Liu, Adel Bibi, Irwin King +1 more

The paper argues that the Authorization-Execution Gap (AEG)—the divergence between intended authorization and actual execution—is a critical safety and security flaw in open-world agents, requiring so…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 14, 2026

Parallax: Why AI Agents That Think Must Never Act

Joel Fokou

The paper introduces Parallax, an architectural framework that structurally separates AI reasoning from action execution to ensure robust safety for autonomous agents, achieving high attack mitigation…

View →
cs.CYcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

Preserving Decision Sovereignty in Military AI: A Trade-Secret-Safe Architectural Framework for Model Replaceability, Human Authority, and State Control

Peng Wei, Wesley Shu

The paper proposes the Energetic Paradigm, a model-agnostic architectural framework that allows states to maintain decision sovereignty and control over military AI systems, even when using proprietar…

View →
cs.MAcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

Architecture Matters for Multi-Agent Security

Ben Hagag, William L. Anderson, Christian Schroeder de Witt, Sarah Scheffler

This paper empirically demonstrates that the architectural design of multi-agent systems significantly impacts their security, finding that coordination mechanisms can introduce vulnerabilities greate…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 29, 2026

Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look

Youness Bouchari, Matteo Boffa, Marco Mellia, Idilio Drago +2 more

The paper re-evaluates LLM agents on CTFs, finding that while general-purpose agents like claude-code are strong baselines, specialized, modular architectures significantly improve performance and con…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 20, 2026

PocketAgents: A Manifest-Driven Library of Autonomous Defense Agents

Sidnei Barbieri, Ágney Lopes Roth Ferraz, Lourenço Alves Pereira Júnior

PocketAgents introduces a manifest-driven framework for autonomous defense agents, enabling measurable and attributable LLM-driven security responses by strictly controlling agent actions and telemetr…

View →
cs.CRcs.MARecentJun 4, 2026

ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense

Anlan Zheng, Tiantian Zhu

ZERO-APT introduces a novel closed-loop adversarial framework for automated penetration testing that simulates attacks against an intelligent, real-time defending system, achieving a high attack succe…

View →