ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.23695v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMar 23, 2026

Semi-Automated Threat Modeling of Cloud-Based Systems Through Extracting Software Architecture from Configuration and Network Flow

Nicholas Pecka, Lotfi Ben Othmane, Bharat Bhargava, Renee Bryce

The paper proposes a novel semi-automated method to perform continuous threat modeling by inferring the actual system architecture from combined static configuration and dynamic network flow data, sig…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights

Saba Pourhanifeh, AbdulAziz AbdulGhaffar, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper empirically evaluates domain-adapted and general-purpose LLMs for structured threat modelling (STRIDE on 5G security), finding that domain adaptation and model size do not guarantee reliable…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →
cs.CRcs.DBRecentApr 8, 2026

VulGD: A LLM-Powered Dynamic Open-Access Vulnerability Graph Database

Luat Do, Jiao Yin, Jinli Cao, Hua Wang

VulGD is a dynamic, open-access graph database that aggregates cybersecurity data from multiple sources and uses LLM embeddings to improve vulnerability representation and risk assessment.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 2, 2026

RuleForge: Automated Generation and Validation for Web Vulnerability Detection at Scale

Ayush Garg, Sophia Hager, Jacob Montiel, Aditya Tiwari +4 more

RuleForge is an automated system that generates and validates detection rules for web vulnerabilities from structured CVE templates, significantly improving detection accuracy and reducing false posit…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

A Ground-Truth-Based Evaluation of Vulnerability Detection Across Multiple Ecosystems

Peter Mandl, Paul Mandl, Martin Häusl, Maximilian Auch

The paper conducts an empirical evaluation of automated vulnerability detection tools across multiple software ecosystems using a curated ground-truth dataset derived from OSV, highlighting systematic…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 14, 2026

Talk is (Not) Cheap: A Taxonomy and Benchmark Coverage Audit for LLM Attacks

Karthik Raghu Iyer, Yazdan Jamshidi, Nicholas Bray, Alexey A. Shvets

The paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy and auditing framework to assess the collective coverage of existing LLM attack benchmarks, revealing significant and systematic gaps in current testing m…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 19, 2026

Hunting Vulnerability Variants in AI Infra: Measurement and Reference-Driven Detection

Tian Dong, Yanjun Chen, Shoufeng Zhang, Huaien Zhang +5 more

This paper measures the prevalence of recurring vulnerability patterns (variants) across multiple AI infrastructure repositories and proposes INFRASCOPE, a framework to automatically detect these vari…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation

Xiaolei Ren

The paper introduces False Security Confidence (FSC), a new metric to measure the inherent prevalence of security vulnerabilities in code generated by LLMs that are otherwise functionally correct, eve…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 16, 2026

STRIDE-AI: A Threat Modeling Framework for Generative AI Security Assessment

Tsafac Nkombong Regine Cyrille, Franziska Schwarz

The paper introduces STRIDE-AI, a novel threat modeling framework that adapts classical STRIDE for generative AI, successfully reducing the attack success rate of a tested LLM chatbot from 80% to 15%.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRcs.PLRecentApr 29, 2026

Adaptive and AI-Augmented Security Testing: A Systematic Survey of Program Analysis, Feedback-Driven Testing, and Hybrid Learning-Based Approaches

Michael Wienczkowski

This paper systematically surveys adaptive and AI-augmented security testing, concluding that a major gap exists—structural-adaptive fragmentation—where current systems fail to integrate structural pr…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 23, 2026

Model Context Protocol Threat Modeling and Analyzing Vulnerabilities to Prompt Injection with Tool Poisoning

Charoes Huang, Xin Huang, Ngoc Phu Tran, Amin Milani Fard

This paper analyzes the security vulnerabilities of the Model Context Protocol (MCP), identifying tool poisoning as the most critical client-side threat, and proposes a multi-layered defense strategy.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 20, 2026

TitanCA: Lessons from Orchestrating LLM Agents to Discover 100+ CVEs

Ting Zhang, Yikun Li, Chengran Yang, Ratnadira Widyasari +14 more

TitanCA presents a novel, multi-agent LLM orchestration framework that significantly improves vulnerability discovery by reducing false positives and identifying numerous zero-day vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

Red-MIRROR: Agentic LLM-based Autonomous Penetration Testing with Reflective Verification and Knowledge-augmented Interaction

Tran Vy Khang, Nguyen Dang Nguyen Khang, Nghi Hoang Khoa, Do Thi Thu Hien +2 more

Red-MIRROR is a novel multi-agent LLM system that automates complex web penetration testing by integrating a memory-reflection backbone, achieving superior performance on industry benchmarks.

View →