ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.28006· 20 results

cs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Extreme Low-Bit Inference in Reasoning Models: Failure Modes and Targeted Recovery

Ekaterina Alimaskina, Darya Rudas, Denis Shveykin, Gleb Molodtsov +2 more

The paper analyzes the failure modes of aggressive 2-bit quantization in large reasoning models, proposing lightweight controls like FP16 planning and loop rescue to restore accuracy and achieve pract…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Revealing Algorithmic Deductive Circuits for Logical Reasoning

Phuong Minh Nguyen, Tien Huu Dang, Naoya Inoue

This paper localizes the attention heads within LLMs responsible for specific reasoning steps, finding that specialized heads handle factual retrieval while higher layers manage global information int…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LORecentMay 27, 2026

Satisfiability Solving with LLMs: A Matched-Pair Evaluation of Reasoning Capability

Leizhen Zhang, Shuhan Chen, Sheng Chen

The paper evaluates LLM reasoning on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, concluding that conventional metrics are misleading and proposing a paired-formula protocol with Accurate Differentiation Ra…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentMar 19, 2026

Implicit Patterns in LLM-Based Binary Analysis

Qiang Li, XiangRui Zhang, Haining Wang

This paper analyzes large-scale reasoning traces from LLM-based binary vulnerability analysis, identifying four structured, token-level implicit patterns that govern how LLMs explore code paths.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

HRBench: Benchmarking and Understanding Thinking-Mode Switch Strategies in Hybrid-Reasoning LLMs

Yansong Ning, Mianpeng Liu, Jingwen Ye, Weidong Zhang +1 more

The paper introduces HRBench, a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework for systematically benchmarking and comparing various thinking-mode switching strategies in hybrid-reasoning LLMs.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Synergistically Evolving Implicit and Explicit Reasoning

Renfei Dang, Xinye Wang, Zhejian Lai, Weilu Xu +4 more

The paper proposes RIEQE, a two-stage training framework that synergistically co-evolves implicit and explicit reasoning capabilities in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) to significantly improve fine-gra…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 6, 2026

Strengthening Human-Centric Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Integrity in LLMs via a Structured Prompt Framework

Jiling Zhou, Aisvarya Adeseye, Seppo Virtanen, Antti Hakkala +1 more

The paper proposes a structured prompt engineering framework to enhance the integrity and reliability of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in LLMs, demonstrating significant improvements in security-se…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation

Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang

The paper introduces TRACE, a novel metric that evaluates the logical structure of LLM reasoning (CoT) by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory, demonstrating that sound reasoning structure corre…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Unlocking the Working Memory of Large Language Models for Latent Reasoning

Lukas Aichberger, Sepp Hochreiter

The paper introduces Reasoning in Memory (RiM), a latent reasoning method that replaces autoregressive token generation with fixed memory blocks to enable compute-efficient internal working memory for…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

An Enigma of Artificial Reason: Investigating the Production-Evaluation Gap in Large Reasoning Models

Mingzhong Sun, Teresa Yeo, Armando Solar-Lezama, Tan Zhi-Xuan

This paper investigates the production-evaluation gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that while LRMs excel at generating solutions, they struggle significantly to evaluate flawed reasoning,…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Testing LLM Arithmetic Reasoning Generalization with Automatic Numeric-Remapping Attacks

Malia Barker, Bishal Lakha, Edoardo Serra, Francesco Gullo

The paper introduces an automatic numeric-remapping attack to test the robustness of LLMs on arithmetic word problems, finding that LLMs remain sensitive to small numeric changes in datasets like GSM8…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 3, 2026

Caliper: Probing Lexical Anchors versus Causal Structure in LLMs

Zhenyu Yu, Shuigeng Zhou

This paper evaluates the causal reasoning abilities of large language models and finds that they rely heavily on lexical pattern matching rather than structural reasoning.

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Distilling Neuro-Symbolic Programs into 3D Multi-modal LLMs

Wentao Mo, Yang Liu

The paper introduces APEIRIA, a neuro-symbolic 3D Multi-modal LLM that bridges the gap between interpretable symbolic reasoning and flexible, open-vocabulary 3D understanding.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models

Areeb Gani, Asal Meskin, Gabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Arman Cohan

The paper introduces a novel framework to quantify faithful confidence expression (FC) in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that FC remains a significant and challenging reliability target for th…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.RORecentMay 27, 2026

ReasonBreak: Probing Vulnerabilities in Reasoning-Enabled Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving

Mohammadreza Teymoorianfard, Jean-Philippe Monteuuis, Jonathan Petit, Amir Houmansadr

This paper demonstrates that reasoning-enabled Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving are highly vulnerable to realistic input perturbations, significantly compromising both reason…

View →
cs.LOcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture

George Koomullil

The paper proposes a trust-boundary architecture using Lean 4 to verify the deterministic structured computations surrounding LLM pipelines, providing verifiable certificates for high-stakes deploymen…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 28, 2026

The Surprising Universality of LLM Outputs: A Real-Time Verification Primitive

Alex Bogdan, Adrian de Valois-Franklin

The paper identifies a universal, statistically predictable distribution (Mandelbrot) governing LLM outputs, enabling a highly efficient, model-agnostic scoring primitive for provenance and quality as…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

ReasonAlloc: Hierarchical Decoding-Time KV Cache Budget Allocation for Reasoning Models

Wenhao Liu, Hao Shi, Yunhe Li, Weizhi Fei +6 more

This paper proposes a training-free framework called ReasonAlloc to mitigate inference bottlenecks in large language models by recasting decoding-time key-value compression as a hierarchical budget al…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

ReasonAlloc: Hierarchical Decoding-Time KV Cache Budget Allocation for Reasoning Models

Wenhao Liu, Hao Shi, Yunhe Li, Weizhi Fei +6 more

This paper proposes a training-free framework called ReasonAlloc to mitigate inference bottlenecks in large language models by recasting decoding-time key-value compression as a hierarchical budget al…

View →