ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.28710· 20 results

cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation

Junjie Chen, Yuxi Dong, Haitao Li, Weihang Su +4 more

The paper introduces LongJudgeBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the reliability of LLM judges specifically for complex, long-form output evaluation, revealing significant instability gaps in…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 23, 2026

Evaluating the Reliability and Fidelity of Automated Judgment Systems of Large Language Models

Tom Biskupski, Stephan Kleber

This paper evaluates the reliability of using Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated judges to assess the quality of other LLMs, finding a high correlation with human judgment when suitable prompts…

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Extracting Small Translation Specialists from LLMs by Aggressively Pruning Experts

Liu O. Martin, Lucas Bandarkar, Nanyun Peng

The paper proposes an aggressive, parameter-efficient method to prune non-essential experts from Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) LLMs, significantly compressing the model while maintaining high machine trans…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training

Yalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang +7 more

This paper proposes four guidelines and two novel data ordering methods (STR and SAW) to systematically optimize data organization, significantly enhancing the stability and performance of LLM trainin…

View →
cs.CLcs.HCRecentMay 29, 2026

Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows

Yuri Balashov, Rex VanHorn, Mingxi Xu, Austin Downes

The paper benchmarks local, offline LLMs for confidential translation workflows, demonstrating that while they are viable for privacy-sensitive use, they generally lag behind top commercial NMT system…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Model-Based Quality Assessment for Massively Multilingual Parallel Data

Abdelaziz M. A. Ibrahim, Zihao Li, Jörg Tiedemann, Shaoxiong Ji

The paper proposes decomposing the assessment of massive multilingual parallel data into separate parallelism and quality estimation components, concluding that no single universal metric is reliable…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 10, 2026

System Report for CCL25-Eval Task 5: New Dataset and LoRA-Fine-Tuned Qwen2.5

Haotao Xie

This paper proposes a domain-specialized large language model, PoetryQwen, for precise translation and emotional understanding of classical poetry.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge

Zijie Wang, Eduardo Blanco

The paper introduces a novel, training-free method to automatically generate fine-grained evaluation rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge, and further proposes an iterative fine-tuning strategy that significant…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Citation Needed Detection on Wikipedia for Lower-Resource Languages

Gerrit Quaremba, Amy Rechkemmer, Elizabeth Black, Denny Vrandečić +1 more

The paper introduces a multilingual corpus and demonstrates that small, fine-tuned language models (SLMs) are highly effective for Citation Needed Detection (CND) in lower-resource languages, often ou…

View →
cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCRecentMay 27, 2026

When Models Disagree: Rethinking LLM Evaluation for Public Comment Analysis

Aisha Najera, Alvin Moon, Vedant Srinivasan, Rajesh Veeraraghavan

The paper proposes an Interpretive Audit Pipeline to evaluate LLMs for public comment analysis, arguing that measuring inter-model disagreement is crucial because standard accuracy metrics fail to det…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Multilinguality of Large Language Models From a Structural Perspective

Haruki Sakajo, Yusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe

This paper analyzes the multilinguality of LLMs by examining their structural properties, finding that low-resource languages are structurally more distinct from English than high-resource languages,…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets

Ana Gjorgjevikj, Barbara Koroušić Seljak, Tome Eftimov

This paper introduces robustness indicators to systematically analyze how multilingual text embedding model rankings change based on dataset composition and aggregation methods, revealing that only a…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces UA-Legal-Bench, a comprehensive Ukrainian legal reasoning benchmark built from a massive judicial corpus, demonstrating that LLM performance is highly task-dependent and that simp…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM Judges Inconsistently Disagree Across Safety Criteria and Harm Categories

Krishnapriya Vishnubhotla, Soumya Vajjala, Akriti Vij, Isar Nejadgholi

The paper evaluates the inconsistency of using LLMs as automated judges for multi-dimensional safety evaluations, finding that LLMs are unreliable for nuanced safety issues like financial advice but m…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability

Tom Lucas, Alessio Buscemi, Alfredo Capozucca, German Castignani +1 more

LLM-FACETS introduces an open-source, privacy-preserving framework designed to enable non-technical domain experts and compliance officers to audit and evaluate the transparency and accountability of…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

MIRA: Mid-training Rubric Anchoring for Source-Aware Data Selection

Haowen Wang, Yaxin Du, Jian Yang, Jiajun Wu +8 more

MIRA proposes a novel source-aware filtering framework that discovers and anchors evaluation rubrics during data selection, significantly improving code-oriented mid-training data quality while reduci…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Learning from Saturated Data: Signals Beyond Correctness for LLM Training

Hanno Hiss, Jasper Dekoninck, Martin Vechev

The paper proposes using fine-grained quality signals, such as pairwise self-judgments and token-level entropy, instead of simple binary correctness to improve LLM performance on saturated datasets, s…

View →