ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.29556· 19 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 20, 2026

Trusted Weights, Treacherous Optimizations? Optimization-Triggered Backdoor Attacks on LLMs

Yifei Wang, Tianlin Li, Xiaohan Zhang, Yida Yang +2 more

This paper introduces a novel class of backdoor attacks that exploit the numerical side effects of LLM inference optimization, achieving high success rates while maintaining clean accuracy.

View →
cs.SEcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Improving Small Language Models for Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Verification Feedback

Egor Skopin, Evgeny Kotelnikov

The paper demonstrates that using Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly improves small language models' functional correctness in code generation, particularly when combi…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Hybrid Verified Decoding: Learning to Allocate Verification in Speculative Decoding

Xin Su, Dawid Majchrowski, Fangyuan Yu, Vanshil Atul Shah +4 more

The paper introduces Hybrid Verified Decoding, a method that predicts the acceptance length of a cache draft to intelligently select between cache verification and model-based drafting, achieving sign…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

OR-Space: A Full-Lifecycle Workspace Benchmark for Industrial Optimization Agents

Chenyu Zhou, Xinyun Lu, Jiangyue Zhao, Jianghao Lin +2 more

The paper introduces OR-Space, a novel full-lifecycle workspace benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate industrial optimization agents by simulating real-world, multi-stage OR workflows that go beyo…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LORecentMay 27, 2026

Satisfiability Solving with LLMs: A Matched-Pair Evaluation of Reasoning Capability

Leizhen Zhang, Shuhan Chen, Sheng Chen

The paper evaluates LLM reasoning on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, concluding that conventional metrics are misleading and proposing a paired-formula protocol with Accurate Differentiation Ra…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

OptSkills: Learning Generalizable Optimization Skills from Problem Archetypes via Cluster-Based Distillation

Haochen Yang, Ke Zhao, Mengyuan Ma, Xingyu Lu +2 more

OptSkills introduces an archetype-centric skill learning agent that improves the generalization of solving optimization problems from natural language by clustering problems by underlying archetypes a…

View →
cs.CLcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

Combinatorial Synthesis: Scaling Code RLVR via Atomic Decomposition and Recombination

Jiasheng Zheng, Boxi Cao, Boxi Yu, Yuzhong Zhang +5 more

The paper introduces Atomic Decomposition and Recombination (ADR), a novel framework that generates genuinely novel and challenging verifiable code tasks, significantly improving the scalability of Re…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Evidence-Gated LLM Priors for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization

Jiangyu Chen, Banyi

The paper proposes an objective-wise reputation-market mechanism to dynamically calibrate and gate LLM-generated expert priors in multi-objective Bayesian optimization, showing that dynamic calibratio…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

KVerus: Scalable and Resilient Formal Verification Proof Generation for Rust Code

Yuwei Liu, Xinyi Wan, Yanhao Wang, Minghua Wang +2 more

KVerus is a retrieval-augmented system that significantly improves the scalability and resilience of formal verification for Rust code by managing complex cross-module dependencies and adapting to cod…

View →
cs.AIcs.LORecentMay 28, 2026

Reliable Reasoning with Large Language Models via Preference-Based Maximum Satisfiability

Pedro Orvalho, Marta Kwiatkowska, Guillem Alenyà, Felip Manyà

The paper proposes a hybrid reasoning framework where Large Language Models (LLMs) generate code to encode complex optimization problems into a preference-based Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) format,…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 17, 2026

DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy

Erchi Wang, Pengrun Huang, Eli Chien, Om Thakkar +3 more

The paper introduces DPrivBench, a new benchmark to test whether large language models (LLMs) can automate the complex reasoning required to verify differential privacy guarantees for algorithms.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Learning When to Optimize: Verified Optimization Skills from Expert GPU-Kernel Lineages

Shuoming Zhang, Qiuchu Yu, Yangyu Zhang, Ruiyuan Xu +5 more

KLineage introduces a novel method to teach LLMs when and how to apply GPU kernel optimizations by reverse-engineering expert kernel lineages, resulting in superior optimization skills compared to exi…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 17, 2026

NANOZK: Layerwise Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Verifiable Large Language Model Inference

Zhaohui Geoffrey Wang

NANOZK introduces a novel, highly efficient zero-knowledge proof system that allows users to cryptographically verify that the output of a large language model (LLM) was generated by a specific, claim…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

LLM-Evolved Domain-Independent Heuristics for Symbolic AI Planning

Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp

This paper introduces the first LLM-generated, domain-independent heuristics for symbolic AI planning, using evolutionary search to surpass the performance of hand-engineered state-of-the-art methods.

View →
cs.LOcs.CEcs.ETRecentJun 1, 2026

Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems

Pierre Falda

The paper proposes a federated formal verification architecture that treats verification as a polyglot proof system, successfully validating it on complex production subsystems like a Raft consensus m…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CVRecentJun 1, 2026

Rethinking Evaluation Paradigms in IBP-based Certified Training

Konstantin Kaulen, Hadar Shavit, Holger H. Hoos

The paper proposes evaluating certified training methods by comparing their Pareto fronts across the natural-certified accuracy trade-off, revealing superior performance and previously unappreciated c…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentMar 19, 2026

Implicit Patterns in LLM-Based Binary Analysis

Qiang Li, XiangRui Zhang, Haining Wang

This paper analyzes large-scale reasoning traces from LLM-based binary vulnerability analysis, identifying four structured, token-level implicit patterns that govern how LLMs explore code paths.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 29, 2026

Neuroforger: certified violation witnesses for smart contracts verification via LLMs

Massimo Bartoletti, Enrico Lipparini

The paper introduces Neuroforger, a system that combines a new formal specification language with LLMs and type checking to reliably generate and validate concrete violation witnesses (counterexamples…

View →