ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.31135v1· 20 results

cs.SEcs.CRRecentMar 27, 2026

A Large-scale Empirical Study on the Generalizability of Disclosed Java Library Vulnerability Exploits

Zirui Chen, Qi Zhan, Jiayuan Zhou, Xing Hu +2 more

This paper conducts a large-scale empirical study demonstrating that Java library exploits can accurately identify affected versions, achieving high recall and precision, and proposes strategies for e…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 5, 2026

LLM-Enabled Open-Source Systems in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in GitHub Security Advisories

Fariha Tanjim Shifat, Hariswar Baburaj, Ce Zhou, Jaydeb Sarker +1 more

The paper analyzes GitHub security advisories for LLM-integrated open-source systems, finding that while most vulnerabilities map to existing code-level weaknesses, the architectural risks like Supply…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

A Quasi-Experimental Developer Study of Security Training in LLM-Assisted Web Application Development

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Radi Jarrar, Samer Zain +2 more

The study found that providing developers with a layer-based security training package significantly reduces the number and severity of security vulnerabilities in LLM-assisted web application develop…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 29, 2026

An Empirical Security Evaluation of LLM-Generated Cryptographic Rust Code

Mohamed Elsayed, Kenneth Fulton, Jeong Yang

This study empirically evaluates the cryptographic security of LLM-generated Rust code, finding that while general analysis tools are insufficient, a custom crypto-specific analyzer successfully ident…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks

Murtuza Shahzad, Joseph Wilson, Ibrahim Al Azher, Hamed Alhoori +1 more

The paper introduces a novel, large-scale dataset of vulnerable code snippets linked to CAPEC and CWE, generated using advanced LLMs, to improve automatic vulnerability detection.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

Longitudinal Analyses of SAST Tools: A CodeQL Case Study

Jean-Charles Noirot Ferrand, Kyle Domico, Yohan Beugin, Patrick McDaniel

This study conducts a large-scale longitudinal analysis of CodeQL, finding that while the tool is effective at detecting vulnerabilities, its detection capabilities are not guaranteed to be stable acr…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Security of LLM-generated Code: A Comparative Analysis

Srivathsan G Morkonda, Mahmoud Selim, Hala Assal

This paper empirically evaluates the security of code generated by seven popular LLMs and finds that all evaluated models generate code containing critical or high-severity vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Bridging Code Property Graphs and Language Models for Program Analysis

Ahmed Lekssays

The paper introduces codebadger, a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates Joern's Code Property Graph (CPG) with LLMs, enabling large language models to perform large-scale, semantic prog…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Based Secure Code Generation

Mohammed F. Kharma, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Ahmed Sabbah, David Mohaisen

The paper introduces the Mitigation-Aware Chain-of-Thought (MA-CoT) framework, which significantly enhances the security reliability of code generated by LLMs across multiple languages and models.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

On the Security of Research Artifacts

Nanda Rani, Christian Rossow

This paper analyzes a large corpus of research artifacts, finding that many contain insecure code patterns, and proposes SAFE, a novel framework for context-aware security assessment of these artifact…

View →
cs.CRcs.PLcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

Symbolic Execution Meets Multi-LLM Orchestration: Detecting Memory Vulnerabilities in Incomplete Rust CVE Snippets

Zeyad Abdelrazek, Young Lee

The paper introduces a novel multi-LLM orchestration system combined with symbolic execution to successfully detect memory vulnerabilities in uncompilable, incomplete Rust CVE code snippets, achieving…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

The Fault in Our Drafts: Vulnerabilities in RPKI Specification and Software

Oliver Jacobsen, Tobias Kirsch, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel +1 more

This paper analyzes RPKI specifications, demonstrating that vague or conflicting requirements in dozens of RFCs cause systemic vulnerabilities in real-world implementations, leading to 61 undocumented…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →