ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.31142· 20 results

cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGEmpiricalRecentJun 11, 2026

SkMTEB: Slovak Massive Text Embedding Benchmark and Model Adaptation

Marek Šuppa, Andrej Ridzik, Daniel Hládek, Natália Kňažeková +1 more

This paper introduces SkMTEB, a comprehensive text embedding benchmark for Slovak, and develops efficient, locally-deployable Slovak embeddings.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Model-Based Quality Assessment for Massively Multilingual Parallel Data

Abdelaziz M. A. Ibrahim, Zihao Li, Jörg Tiedemann, Shaoxiong Ji

The paper proposes decomposing the assessment of massive multilingual parallel data into separate parallelism and quality estimation components, concluding that no single universal metric is reliable…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Multilinguality of Large Language Models From a Structural Perspective

Haruki Sakajo, Yusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe

This paper analyzes the multilinguality of LLMs by examining their structural properties, finding that low-resource languages are structurally more distinct from English than high-resource languages,…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

XLGoBench: Detecting cross-lingual skill gaps with algorithmic tasks

Purvam Jain, Preethi Jyothi, Vihari Piratla, Suvrat Raju

The paper introduces XLGoBench, a synthetic benchmark of algorithmic tasks designed to detect persistent cross-lingual skill gaps in large language models.

View →
cs.CLcs.HCRecentMay 29, 2026

Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows

Yuri Balashov, Rex VanHorn, Mingxi Xu, Austin Downes

The paper benchmarks local, offline LLMs for confidential translation workflows, demonstrating that while they are viable for privacy-sensitive use, they generally lag behind top commercial NMT system…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Understanding LLM Behavior in Multi-Target Cross-Lingual Summarization

Sangwon Ryu, Yihong Liu, Mingyang Wang, Yunsu Kim +3 more

The paper introduces a new benchmark for multi-target cross-lingual summarization (MTXLS) and proposes an activation steering method that significantly improves LLM performance by guiding the generati…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives

Youngjoon Jang, Seongtae Hong, Heuiseok Lim

The paper proposes MIMO, a two-stage framework that improves Multilingual Information Retrieval (MLIR) by stabilizing cross-lingual alignment and enhancing retrieval discrimination using a combination…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Reliable Multilingual LLMs-as-a-Judge: An Empirical Study

Irune Zubiaga, Aitor Soroa, Rodrigo Agerri

This study systematically analyzes strategies for creating reliable multilingual LLMs-as-a-judge, finding that fine-tuning smaller models with in-domain data is effective, while zero-shot evaluation w…

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Data filtering methods for training language models

Egor Shevchenko, Elena Bruches

This paper comparatively analyzes two automatic label error detection methods, Confident Learning and Dataset Cartography, demonstrating that targeted data filtering significantly improves model perfo…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

DEPART: DEcomposing PARiTy across Multilingual LLMs

Manan Uppadhyay, Prashant Kodali, Pranjal Chitale, Reshma Ramaprasad +2 more

The paper introduces a diagnostic framework to decompose multilingual LLM performance variance, showing that language identity and model-benchmark interactions are key drivers of performance gaps.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

When Is 0.1% Enough? Analyzing the Combined Effects of Dimensionality Reduction and Quantization on Text Embedding Compression

Riku Kisako, Hayato Tsukagoshi, Ryohei Sasano

This paper systematically analyzes combining dimensionality reduction and quantization to compress text embeddings, showing that this combined approach achieves substantial compression (e.g., 0.1% siz…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Harnessing non-adversarial robustness in large language models

Qinghua Zhou, Ellina Aleshina, Andrey Lovyagin, Oleg Somov +5 more

The paper proposes a debiasing fine-tuning technique to efficiently enhance the robustness of Large Language Models against semantically similar but textually altered prompts.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training

Yalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang +7 more

This paper proposes four guidelines and two novel data ordering methods (STR and SAW) to systematically optimize data organization, significantly enhancing the stability and performance of LLM trainin…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 8, 2026

Vaporizer: Breaking Watermarking Schemes for Large Language Model Outputs

Jonathan Hong Jin Ng, Anh Tu Ngo, Anupam Chattopadhyay

The paper analyzes the robustness of current LLM watermarking schemes against various text modifications, concluding that watermarks can be removed with reasonable effort.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Auditing LLM Benchmarks with Item Response Theory

Sander Land, Daniel M. Bikel

The paper introduces an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based indicator that effectively identifies likely mislabeled items in existing LLM benchmarks, revealing systematic errors in labeling and model spe…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

TSM-Bench: Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Real-World Wikipedia Editing Practices

Gerrit Quaremba, Elizabeth Black, Denny Vrandečić, Elena Simperl

The paper introduces TSM-Bench, a new benchmark that demonstrates existing LLM-generated text detectors fail to accurately identify task-specific machine-generated content found in real-world Wikipedi…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 19, 2026

LLM Benchmark Datasets Should Be Contamination-Resistant

Ali Al-Lawati, Jason Lucas, Dongwon Lee, Suhang Wang

The paper argues that current LLM benchmark datasets are often contaminated by being included in pretraining data, and proposes that future benchmarks must be contamination-resistant and support infer…

View →