ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.31338· 20 results

cs.DLcs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Digging Up Citations: FOSSIL, a Dataset and Workflow for Reference Extraction in Law and the Humanities

Luca Foppiano, Christian Boulanger

The paper introduces FOSSIL, a new multilingual dataset and specialized workflow designed to significantly improve the extraction of citations embedded within complex footnotes common in law and human…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law

Sebastian Nagl, Ann-Kristin Mayrhofer, Martin Heidebach, Aleyna Koçak +5 more

The paper introduces BenGER, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on German legal reasoning, demonstrating that closed-flagship models perform best and that human-AI co-creation significantly…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 2, 2026

Re-Ranking Through an Attribution Lens for Citation Quality in Legal QA

Mohamed Hesham Elganayni, Selim Saleh

The paper introduces a cross-encoder re-ranker trained on attribution scores to improve the retrieval of highly relevant citation passages for legal question answering, outperforming standard semantic…

View →
cs.CLcs.DLRecentMay 30, 2026

Citation Grounding: Detecting and Reducing LLM Citation Hallucinations via Legal Citation Graphs

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Citation Grounding (CG), a novel metric and framework, to systematically detect and reduce the hallucination of legal citations by verifying LLM outputs against a massive, structu…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law

Ethan Zhao, Maksym Taranukhin, Wei Cui, Moira Aikenhead +1 more

The paper introduces CanLegalRAGBench, a new Canadian legal QA benchmark, and evaluates RAG systems, finding that while open-source models are competitive, automatic evaluations struggle with nuanced…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.MARecentMay 27, 2026

LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal Reasoning

Zerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Zhishang Xiang, Zhimin Wei +4 more

LegalGraphRAG introduces a multi-agent, hierarchical graph retrieval-augmented generation framework to overcome the limitations of traditional RAG in legal domains, achieving state-of-the-art reliable…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces UA-Legal-Bench, a comprehensive Ukrainian legal reasoning benchmark built from a massive judicial corpus, demonstrating that LLM performance is highly task-dependent and that simp…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Reading Between the Citations: A Typed Claim Network for Scientific Literature

Ning Ding, Sergio J. Rodríguez Méndez, Pouya G. Omran

The paper introduces a typed claim network that models cross-document references by explicitly labeling the stance (e.g., agreement, disagreement) of a citation, significantly improving downstream tas…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering

Yeong-Joon Ju, Seong-Whan Lee

The paper introduces RefWalk, a novel framework designed to improve regulatory compliance question answering by ensuring rigorous citation traceability and explicit per-rule attribution across complex…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Enhancing BiGRU with a KAN Block for Legal Document Classification and Summarization

Ahmed Faizul Haque Dhrubo, Souvik Pramanik, Most. Aysha Siddika Sumona, Shahnewaz Siddique +3 more

The paper proposes a novel KAN-enhanced BiGRU architecture to improve legal document classification and summarization in a low-resource, multilingual setting using Bengali and English legal texts.

View →
cs.IRcs.CLDatasetRecentJun 9, 2026

A PubMed-Scale Dataset of Structured Biomedical Abstracts

Chia-Hsuan Chang, Haerin Song, Brian Ondov, Hua Xu

The authors introduce Structured PubMed, a comprehensive corpus of section-labeled biomedical abstracts compiled from the complete PubMed database.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

The Cases LJP Never Sees: Prosecution Decision Prediction for More Complete Criminal Liability Assessment

Junyu Lu, Qi Wei, Peishuo Zheng, Jie Zhang +5 more

The paper introduces Prosecution Decision Prediction (PDP), a new legal AI task that assesses prosecutorial review decisions, showing that current state-of-the-art LLMs perform significantly worse on…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli, Yanran Chen +9 more

This paper conducts a large-scale audit of human annotation reporting in NLP, finding that while reporting has improved, critical details needed to assess annotation validity, such as training and agr…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation

Junjie Chen, Yuxi Dong, Haitao Li, Weihang Su +4 more

The paper introduces LongJudgeBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the reliability of LLM judges specifically for complex, long-form output evaluation, revealing significant instability gaps in…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVRecentMay 31, 2026

Dr. DocBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Expert-Level and Difficult Document Parsing

Minglai Yang, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Pengyuan Li, Xinyu Guo +21 more

The paper introduces Dr. DocBench, a difficulty-aware, comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously test expert-level and challenging document parsing capabilities for VLMs, demonstrating that curre…

View →
cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 28, 2026

Rethinking Literature Search Evaluation: Deep Research Helps, and Human Citation Lists Are Not a Ground Truth

Gaurav Sahu, Laurent Charlin, Christopher Pal

The paper introduces a Deep Research pipeline that significantly improves literature search recall and demonstrates that human-curated citation lists are often unreliable and do not serve as a true gr…

View →
cs.CLcs.HCRecentMay 29, 2026

Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows

Yuri Balashov, Rex VanHorn, Mingxi Xu, Austin Downes

The paper benchmarks local, offline LLMs for confidential translation workflows, demonstrating that while they are viable for privacy-sensitive use, they generally lag behind top commercial NMT system…

View →
cs.IREmpiricalRecentJun 10, 2026

FAST-MEL: A Fast, Accurate, and Storage Efficient Solution for Multimodal Entity Linking

Derrien Thomas, Laurent Amsaleg, Pascale Sébillot

This paper proposes a lightweight encoder-based MEL solution called FAST-MEL that meets three objectives: high linking accuracy, computational efficiency, and storage efficiency.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Ryze: Evidence-Enriched Data Synthesis from Biomedical Papers

Yeqi Huang, Yue Chen, Yanwei Ye, Guanhao Su +1 more

The paper introduces Ryze, an automated system that synthesizes evidence-enriched Question-Answering (QA) pairs from raw biomedical papers, resulting in a specialized VLM (BioVLM-8B) that significantl…

View →