ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.00116· 20 results

cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces UA-Legal-Bench, a comprehensive Ukrainian legal reasoning benchmark built from a massive judicial corpus, demonstrating that LLM performance is highly task-dependent and that simp…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law

Sebastian Nagl, Ann-Kristin Mayrhofer, Martin Heidebach, Aleyna Koçak +5 more

The paper introduces BenGER, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on German legal reasoning, demonstrating that closed-flagship models perform best and that human-AI co-creation significantly…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Multimodal Approaches for Visually-Rich Document Type Classification: A Comparative Analysis

Catyana Heyne, Jürgen Frikel, Filippo Riccio

The paper systematically compares multimodal transformer and LLM approaches for document type classification, finding that specialized multimodal Transformers outperform LLM-based models, especially w…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVRecentMay 31, 2026

Dr. DocBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Expert-Level and Difficult Document Parsing

Minglai Yang, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Pengyuan Li, Xinyu Guo +21 more

The paper introduces Dr. DocBench, a difficulty-aware, comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously test expert-level and challenging document parsing capabilities for VLMs, demonstrating that curre…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law

Ethan Zhao, Maksym Taranukhin, Wei Cui, Moira Aikenhead +1 more

The paper introduces CanLegalRAGBench, a new Canadian legal QA benchmark, and evaluates RAG systems, finding that while open-source models are competitive, automatic evaluations struggle with nuanced…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Understanding LLM Behavior in Multi-Target Cross-Lingual Summarization

Sangwon Ryu, Yihong Liu, Mingyang Wang, Yunsu Kim +3 more

The paper introduces a new benchmark for multi-target cross-lingual summarization (MTXLS) and proposes an activation steering method that significantly improves LLM performance by guiding the generati…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations

Mateusz Śmigielski, Michał Rajkowski, Mateusz Zbrocki, Michał Bernacki-Janson +4 more

This study systematically evaluates a wide range of chunking methods for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to assess their effectiveness and highlight the overlooked challenges associated with chun…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 2, 2026

Re-Ranking Through an Attribution Lens for Citation Quality in Legal QA

Mohamed Hesham Elganayni, Selim Saleh

The paper introduces a cross-encoder re-ranker trained on attribution scores to improve the retrieval of highly relevant citation passages for legal question answering, outperforming standard semantic…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

SN-WER: Script-Normalized WER for Multi-Script Indic ASR Evaluation

Priyaranjan Pattnayak

The paper introduces Script-Normalized WER (SN-WER), a novel evaluation metric that transliterates ASR transcripts into a canonical script to accurately measure speech recognition performance across d…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Zero-Shot Topic Classification: A Multi-Strategy Comparative Study

Shahana Akter, Yatharth Vohra, Ankita Shukla, Souvika Sarkar

The paper proposes a zero-shot multi-label topic classification framework and finds that while knowledge graph augmentation improves performance for smaller language models, it offers diminishing retu…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets

Ana Gjorgjevikj, Barbara Koroušić Seljak, Tome Eftimov

This paper introduces robustness indicators to systematically analyze how multilingual text embedding model rankings change based on dataset composition and aggregation methods, revealing that only a…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Bundesrecht: An Open Library and Corpus for German Statutory Reference Processing

Harshil Darji, Martin Heckelmann, Christina Kratsch, Gerard de Melo

The paper introduces 'bundesrecht,' an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for processing complex German statutory references, which parses, normalizes, and resolves raw citation strings into structured,…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training

Yalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang +7 more

This paper proposes four guidelines and two novel data ordering methods (STR and SAW) to systematically optimize data organization, significantly enhancing the stability and performance of LLM trainin…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Reliable Multilingual LLMs-as-a-Judge: An Empirical Study

Irune Zubiaga, Aitor Soroa, Rodrigo Agerri

This study systematically analyzes strategies for creating reliable multilingual LLMs-as-a-judge, finding that fine-tuning smaller models with in-domain data is effective, while zero-shot evaluation w…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation

Junjie Chen, Yuxi Dong, Haitao Li, Weihang Su +4 more

The paper introduces LongJudgeBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the reliability of LLM judges specifically for complex, long-form output evaluation, revealing significant instability gaps in…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli, Yanran Chen +9 more

This paper conducts a large-scale audit of human annotation reporting in NLP, finding that while reporting has improved, critical details needed to assess annotation validity, such as training and agr…

View →
cs.IREmpiricalRecentJun 10, 2026

CompRank: Efficient LLM Reranking via Token-Level Compression and Decoding-Free Scoring

Xuan Lu, Haohang Huang, Yingqi Fan, Junlong Tong +4 more

This paper proposes CompRank, a token-efficient reranking framework for large language models that reduces redundant computation and achieves strong reranking performance.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 19, 2026

Security Document Classification with a Fine-Tuned Local Large Language Model: Benchmark Data and an Open-Source System

Ivan Dobrovolskyi

The paper introduces TorchSight, an open-source local system using a fine-tuned Qwen 3.5 27B model that achieves high accuracy (95.0%) in classifying sensitive security documents without relying on ex…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.MARecentMay 27, 2026

LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal Reasoning

Zerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Zhishang Xiang, Zhimin Wei +4 more

LegalGraphRAG introduces a multi-agent, hierarchical graph retrieval-augmented generation framework to overcome the limitations of traditional RAG in legal domains, achieving state-of-the-art reliable…

View →