ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.00559· 20 results

cs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Extreme Low-Bit Inference in Reasoning Models: Failure Modes and Targeted Recovery

Ekaterina Alimaskina, Darya Rudas, Denis Shveykin, Gleb Molodtsov +2 more

The paper analyzes the failure modes of aggressive 2-bit quantization in large reasoning models, proposing lightweight controls like FP16 planning and loop rescue to restore accuracy and achieve pract…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Task Structure Reverses Layerwise State Encoding in Sequence Models

Yuhang Jiang

The paper demonstrates that the location and nature of state encoding in sequence models are not fixed architectural traits but are highly dependent on the specific task, showing that the encoding pro…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Integrated and Cross-Architecture Interpretation of LLM Reasoning

Leonardo Matthew Yauw, Wei-Bin Kou, Yujiu Yang

The paper introduces an Integrated, cross-Architecture Reasoning (IAR) framework to provide a unified and robust method for interpreting the opaque reasoning processes within Large Language Models.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

On the Generalization Gap in Self-Evolving Language Model Reasoning

Zhenting Qi, Susanna Maria Baby, Stefanie Anna Baby, Kan Yuan +4 more

The paper investigates the limits of self-evolution in LLM reasoning under closed-loop settings, finding that while self-improvement is significant, it consistently falls short of perfect oracle super…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Revealing Algorithmic Deductive Circuits for Logical Reasoning

Phuong Minh Nguyen, Tien Huu Dang, Naoya Inoue

This paper localizes the attention heads within LLMs responsible for specific reasoning steps, finding that specialized heads handle factual retrieval while higher layers manage global information int…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LORecentMay 27, 2026

Satisfiability Solving with LLMs: A Matched-Pair Evaluation of Reasoning Capability

Leizhen Zhang, Shuhan Chen, Sheng Chen

The paper evaluates LLM reasoning on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, concluding that conventional metrics are misleading and proposing a paired-formula protocol with Accurate Differentiation Ra…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Unlocking the Working Memory of Large Language Models for Latent Reasoning

Lukas Aichberger, Sepp Hochreiter

The paper introduces Reasoning in Memory (RiM), a latent reasoning method that replaces autoregressive token generation with fixed memory blocks to enable compute-efficient internal working memory for…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.NERecentMay 27, 2026

BIRDNet: Mining and Encoding Boolean Implication Knowledge Graphs as Interpretable Deep Neural Networks

Tirtharaj Dash

BIRDNet is a novel, sparse, and interpretable deep neural network that encodes Boolean implication knowledge mined directly from tabular data, achieving performance comparable to dense models while dr…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Zipping the Thought: When and How Compressed Reasoning Data Works in LLM Post-Training

Kohsei Matsutani, Gouki Minegishi, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa +1 more

This paper investigates how different types of compressed reasoning data (Explicit, Composed, Implicit CoT) affect LLM performance during post-training, finding that the choice of compression and subs…

View →
cs.LGcs.CCRecentJun 1, 2026

Rethinking the Role of Positional Encoding: Sliding-Window Transformers without PE Remain Turing Complete

Qian Li, Xinyu Mao, Shang-Hua Teng

The paper demonstrates that positional encodings are not necessary for transformers to achieve universal computation, showing that the inherent mechanism of sliding context windows already provides su…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

CORE: Contrastive Reflection Enables Rapid Improvements in Reasoning

Linas Nasvytis, Simon Jerome Han, Ben Prystawski, Satchel Grant +2 more

The paper introduces Contrastive Reflection (CORE), a novel non-parametric method that rapidly improves language model reasoning by distilling contrasts between successful and unsuccessful problem att…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGEmpiricalRecentJun 4, 2026

Latent Reasoning with Normalizing Flows

Guancheng Tu, Xiangjun Fu, Suhao Yu, Yao Tang +4 more

This paper proposes NF-CoT, a latent reasoning framework that preserves the advantages of chain-of-thought in large language models.

View →
cs.CLcs.LGEmpiricalRecentJun 4, 2026

Latent Reasoning with Normalizing Flows

Guancheng Tu, Xiangjun Fu, Suhao Yu, Yao Tang +4 more

This paper proposes NF-CoT, a latent reasoning framework that preserves the advantages of chain-of-thought in large language models.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning

Jiazhen Huang, Xiao Chen, Xiao Luo, Yong Dai +2 more

The paper proposes Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation (SGSD), a novel framework that uses retrieved, potentially noisy skills to guide LLM reasoning, achieving state-of-the-art performance on m…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

ReasonAlloc: Hierarchical Decoding-Time KV Cache Budget Allocation for Reasoning Models

Wenhao Liu, Hao Shi, Yunhe Li, Weizhi Fei +6 more

This paper proposes a training-free framework called ReasonAlloc to mitigate inference bottlenecks in large language models by recasting decoding-time key-value compression as a hierarchical budget al…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

ReasonAlloc: Hierarchical Decoding-Time KV Cache Budget Allocation for Reasoning Models

Wenhao Liu, Hao Shi, Yunhe Li, Weizhi Fei +6 more

This paper proposes a training-free framework called ReasonAlloc to mitigate inference bottlenecks in large language models by recasting decoding-time key-value compression as a hierarchical budget al…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 3, 2026

Failed Reasoning Traces Tell You What Is Fixable (But Not by Reading Them)

Nizar Islah, Istabrak Abbes, Irina Rish, Sarath Chandar +1 more

This paper proposes a method to recover recoverability structure from failed traces of post-trained language models, enabling test-time routing and post-training analysis.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

The Deterministic Horizon: When Extended Reasoning Fails and Tool Delegation Becomes Necessary

Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu

The paper demonstrates that extended pure neural reasoning fails on complex, deterministic state-tracking tasks beyond a certain 'Deterministic Horizon,' necessitating the integration of external tool…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to Intervention

Shuochen Chang, Tong Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qianli Ma +4 more

This paper introduces interpretability-guided, training-free interventions that systematically improve the accuracy and controllability of latent reasoning in LLMs by leveraging structural and causal…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Efficient Test-time Inference for Generative Planning Models

Robert Gieselmann, Mihai Samson, Federico Pecora, Jeremy L. Wyatt

The paper proposes an efficient inference procedure for generative planning models by modifying the Open-Closed List (OCL) search, achieving superior performance over existing baselines.

View →