ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.00642· 20 results

cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

Hidden Thoughts Are Not Secret: Reasoning Trace Exposure in LLMs

Yu-An Lu, Ci-Yang Tsai, Yu-Lin Tsai, Raluca Ada Popa +1 more

The paper introduces Reasoning Exposure Prompting (REP), a method that demonstrates that even when LLMs hide their internal reasoning steps from users, useful reasoning supervision can still be elicit…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation

Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang

The paper introduces TRACE, a novel metric that evaluates the logical structure of LLM reasoning (CoT) by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory, demonstrating that sound reasoning structure corre…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 25, 2026

Hiding in Plain Sight: Detectability-Aware Antidistillation of Reasoning Models

Max Hartman, Vidhata Jayaraman, Moulik Choraria, Yash Savani +1 more

The paper introduces TraceGuard, a detectability-aware antidistillation method that identifies and poisons 'thought anchors'—sparsely critical sentences—to degrade student model learning without makin…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

ReasonOps: Operator Segmentation for LLM Reasoning Traces

Daniel Lee, Owen Queen, James Zou

ReasonOps introduces an unsupervised method to segment and analyze the common, compositional structure of LLM reasoning traces, discovering universal reasoning operators that predict model identity an…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

CORE: Contrastive Reflection Enables Rapid Improvements in Reasoning

Linas Nasvytis, Simon Jerome Han, Ben Prystawski, Satchel Grant +2 more

The paper introduces Contrastive Reflection (CORE), a novel non-parametric method that rapidly improves language model reasoning by distilling contrasts between successful and unsuccessful problem att…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 3, 2026

Failed Reasoning Traces Tell You What Is Fixable (But Not by Reading Them)

Nizar Islah, Istabrak Abbes, Irina Rish, Sarath Chandar +1 more

This paper proposes a method to recover recoverability structure from failed traces of post-trained language models, enabling test-time routing and post-training analysis.

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentApr 5, 2026

Towards Unveiling Vulnerabilities of Large Reasoning Models in Machine Unlearning

Aobo Chen, Chenxu Zhao, Chenglin Miao, Mengdi Huai

The paper proposes a novel bi-level exact unlearning attack targeting Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) that forces incorrect final answers while generating misleading reasoning traces, highlighting new s…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

An Enigma of Artificial Reason: Investigating the Production-Evaluation Gap in Large Reasoning Models

Mingzhong Sun, Teresa Yeo, Armando Solar-Lezama, Tan Zhi-Xuan

This paper investigates the production-evaluation gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that while LRMs excel at generating solutions, they struggle significantly to evaluate flawed reasoning,…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

ThinkSwitch: Context Distillation with LoRA and Weight Interpolation for Specific-Purpose Reasoning Tasks

Dhruv Saini, Rohan Pandey

ThinkSwitch introduces a low-compute co-training procedure that distills the reasoning benefit of large language models into weights, significantly improving performance on specific reasoning tasks.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models

Xunguang Wang, Yuguang Zhou, Qingyue Wang, Zongjie Li +4 more

This paper introduces a novel framework, the Reasoning Safety Monitor, to detect and prevent logical inconsistencies and adversarial manipulations within the internal reasoning steps of large language…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 6, 2026

Strengthening Human-Centric Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Integrity in LLMs via a Structured Prompt Framework

Jiling Zhou, Aisvarya Adeseye, Seppo Virtanen, Antti Hakkala +1 more

The paper proposes a structured prompt engineering framework to enhance the integrity and reliability of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in LLMs, demonstrating significant improvements in security-se…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Works

Yaoming Li, Guangxiang Zhao, Qilong Shi, Lin Sun +2 more

This paper synthesizes over 150 scattered studies and reports to provide the first comprehensive primer on post-training reasoning data, organizing the field around data objects, utility, construction…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Bridging the Detection-to-Abstention Gap in Reasoning Models under Insufficient Information

Renjie Gu, Jiaxu Li, Yihao Wang, Yun Yue +7 more

The paper addresses the 'detection-to-abstention gap' in reasoning models, where detecting insufficient information does not lead to abstention, by proposing a novel control framework that forces mode…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Revealing Algorithmic Deductive Circuits for Logical Reasoning

Phuong Minh Nguyen, Tien Huu Dang, Naoya Inoue

This paper localizes the attention heads within LLMs responsible for specific reasoning steps, finding that specialized heads handle factual retrieval while higher layers manage global information int…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

The Chain Holds, the Answer Folds: Trace-Answer Dissociation in Reasoning Models Under Adversarial Pressure

Yubo Li, Ramayya Krishnan, Rema Padman

The paper identifies a failure mode called unfaithful capitulation (UC), where reasoning models maintain a correct internal thought process (chain-of-thought) but output an incorrect final answer when…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 15, 2026

Asking Back: Interaction-Layer Antidistillation Watermarks

Guang Yang, Amir Ghasemian, Fengchen Liu, Zhong Wang +2 more

The paper proposes interaction-layer antidistillation watermarks by embedding behavioral markers into the system prompt, which successfully track knowledge distillation even when paraphrasing attacker…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Diagnosing Harmful Continuation in Answer-Correct Long-CoT Training Traces

Chen He, Yuhao Wu, Lei Wang, Wenxuan Zhang +1 more

The paper identifies and demonstrates that post-conclusion continuation in answer-correct long-CoT traces is harmful during LLM fine-tuning, proposing a method to cut this continuation.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 21, 2026

AEGIS: From Clues to Verdicts -- Graph-Guided Deep Vulnerability Reasoning via Dialectics and Meta-Auditing

Sen Fang, Weiyuan Ding, Zhezhen Cao, Zhou Yang +1 more

AEGIS is a novel multi-agent framework that grounds vulnerability reasoning by reconstructing per-variable dependency chains over a Code Property Graph, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the P…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents

Faruk Alpay, Taylan Alpay

The paper introduces AgentSecBench, a security evaluation framework that measures prompt injection, privacy leakage, and tool-use integrity in LLM agents by defining formal security games and testing…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Points

Felix Zhou, Anay Mehrotra, Quanquan C. Liu

The paper introduces Entropy-Cut Metropolis-Hastings, an efficient sampling method that uses next-token entropy to identify and resample from critical decision points in a reasoning trace, significant…

View →