ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.01820· 17 results

cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Refining Word-Based Grammatical Error Annotation for L2 Korean

Jungyeul Park, Kyungtae Lim, Wonjun Oh, Benjamin Nguyen +3 more

This paper refines word-based grammatical error annotation for L2 Korean by adapting existing resources to better reflect Korean morphology and error types, improving the evaluation of Korean Grammati…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

SN-WER: Script-Normalized WER for Multi-Script Indic ASR Evaluation

Priyaranjan Pattnayak

The paper introduces Script-Normalized WER (SN-WER), a novel evaluation metric that transliterates ASR transcripts into a canonical script to accurately measure speech recognition performance across d…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIeess.ASRecentMay 31, 2026

PolySpeech-100: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Speech Understanding Across 100+ Languages and Dialects

Sicheng Yang, Shulan Ruan, Shiwei Wu, Yu Liu +3 more

PolySpeech-100 introduces a massive, multi-lingual benchmark covering 110 linguistic variants to rigorously test Speech-LLMs, demonstrating that open-source models struggle with low-resource languages…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Towards Human-Like Interactive Speech Recognition With Agentic Correction and Semantic Evaluation

Zixuan Jiang, Yanqiao Zhu, Peng Wang, Qinyuan Chen +7 more

The paper proposes Agentic ASR, a closed-loop framework that treats ASR as a multi-turn refinement task, significantly improving semantic accuracy over traditional token-level metrics.

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 11, 2026

Automated reproducibility assessments in the social and behavioral sciences using large language models

Tobias Holtdirk, Pietro Marcolongo, Anna Steinberg Schulten, Felix Henninger +6 more

This paper shows that large language models can automate reproducibility assessments in the social and behavioral sciences.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations

Mateusz Śmigielski, Michał Rajkowski, Mateusz Zbrocki, Michał Bernacki-Janson +4 more

This study systematically evaluates a wide range of chunking methods for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to assess their effectiveness and highlight the overlooked challenges associated with chun…

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 30, 2026

On the Limits of LLM Adaptability: Impact of Model-Internalized Priors on Annotation Task Performance

Etienne Casanova, Rafal Kocielnik, R. Michael Alvarez

The paper demonstrates that LLM performance in zero-shot annotation is significantly limited by the alignment between the model's internal understanding and the task definition, showing that prompt-ba…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Not What, But How: A Communicative Audit of LLM Response Framing

Siddhesh Milind Pawar, Sarah Masud, Haneul Yoo, Alice Oh +1 more

The paper introduces FRANZ, a communicative audit framework, to evaluate how LLMs frame responses to subjective questions, finding that LLMs exhibit statistically significant and coupled differences i…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

From Outliers to Errors: Auditing Pali-to-English LLM Translations with Multi-Reference Adjudication

Máté Metzger, Nadnapang Phophichit, Hansa Dhammahaso

The paper proposes an advanced auditing framework for classical-to-modern LLM translations, demonstrating that embedding drift signals potential error severity rather than error itself, and identifyin…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Language Models Learn Constructional Semantics, Not To Mention Syntax: Investigating LM Understanding of Paired-Focus Constructions

Wesley Scivetti, Ethan Wilcox, Nathan Schneider, Kanishka Misra +1 more

The paper investigates whether modestly sized open-source language models can grasp the semantics of rare Paired-Focus constructions, finding that understanding emerges later in training and correlate…

View →
cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCRecentMay 27, 2026

When Models Disagree: Rethinking LLM Evaluation for Public Comment Analysis

Aisha Najera, Alvin Moon, Vedant Srinivasan, Rajesh Veeraraghavan

The paper proposes an Interpretive Audit Pipeline to evaluate LLMs for public comment analysis, arguing that measuring inter-model disagreement is crucial because standard accuracy metrics fail to det…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 3, 2026

Caliper: Probing Lexical Anchors versus Causal Structure in LLMs

Zhenyu Yu, Shuigeng Zhou

This paper evaluates the causal reasoning abilities of large language models and finds that they rely heavily on lexical pattern matching rather than structural reasoning.

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 17, 2026

TWGuard: A Case Study of LLM Safety Guardrails for Localized Linguistic Contexts

Hua-Rong Chu, Kuan-Chun Wang, Yao-Te Huang

The paper introduces TWGuard, a linguistic context-optimized safety guardrail model, demonstrating that tailoring AI safety mechanisms to specific local linguistic contexts significantly improves perf…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

Safety Geometry Collapse in Multimodal LLMs and Adaptive Drift Correction

Jiahe Guo, Xiangran Guo, Jiaxuan Chen, Weixiang Zhao +5 more

This paper introduces the concept of Safety Geometry Collapse, demonstrating that multimodal inputs degrade the safety separation of LLMs, and proposes ReGap, a training-free method that adaptively co…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli, Yanran Chen +9 more

This paper conducts a large-scale audit of human annotation reporting in NLP, finding that while reporting has improved, critical details needed to assess annotation validity, such as training and agr…

View →